Poor things is the worst movie I have seen in the past decade

[Pliny Pete]

how big was the apple?

 

[Osculater]

D'ya wanna try ?




Seems to be several mainstream actresses doing full nudity currently.

I don't try I just do it, bro

Full nudity gets you an Oscar nomination

 

[Tone C]

I don't try I just do it, bro

Full nudity gets you an Oscar nomination

That explains why Margot Robie missed out for Barbie then...

 

[Osculater]

That explains why Margot Robie missed out for Barbie then...

For sure she fvcked up by not showing the Barbie goodies

 

[moreorless87]

I would say the opposite personally, the Oscars generally have a history of shying away from sexually explicit films.

I'd guess the reaction to this comes down to it being an arthouse dark comedy which has gotten mainstream distribution.

 

[cmw43]

I thought this film was great and Emma Stone blew Margot Robbie's performance out the water and thematically they had similarities and that's why she got the oscar nod.

It was a very original and witty script and I liked how out there the film was, it felt very much like Edward Scissorhands meets Barbie with a splash of Amelie.

It seems like a lot Americans/Canadians just get very prudish around nudity and sexuality like TS.

 

[Bacco]

For sure she fvcked up by not showing the Barbie goodies

To be fair that would have left bros pissed, Barbie does'nt have nipples or vagina (she even say it in the movie)... 100% movie would have made that full frontal made of smooth nothingness there

But The Wolf of Wall Street is a thing

 

[Slobodan]

Emma Stone doing full frontal and sticking an apple up her vag is not an Oscar worthy performance.

@lsa is a big fan of Emma Stone so he will be excited to hear about this.

 

[lsa]

@lsa is a big fan of Emma Stone so he will be excited to hear about this.

I am also a big fan of apples.
I prefer the red ones over the green ones.

 

[Halifax]

How in the hell did you get all the way to 2024 and still have any faith in Rotten Tomatoes?

Right?

Rotten tomatoes trashes a lot of quality movies and praises a lot of shit movies. It's a bunch of pretentious bored critics trying to always say "unoriginal" to everything and praise anything they deem different or new.

 

[Long Dark Blues]

Emma Stone got a tight little body

 

[Halifax]

I thought this film was great and Emma Stone blew Margot Robbie's performance out the water and thematically they had similarities and that's why she got the oscar nod.

It was a very original and witty script and I liked how out there the film was, it felt very much like Edward Scissorhands meets Barbie with a splash of Amelie.

It seems like a lot Americans/Canadians just get very prudish around nudity and sexuality like TS.

Prudish? Not really. But why would I get excited over 35 year old Emma finally baring it all ? A lot of actresses do that when age is shutting their options down

We all wanted 20 year old Emma to show it in a teen comedy or two.

 

[cmw43]

Prudish? Not really. But why would I get excited over 35 year old Emma finally baring it all ? A lot of actresses do that when age is shutting their options down

We all wanted 20 year old Emma to show it in a teen comedy or two.

I didn't say you needed to get excited about it, just that it shouldn't necessarily be a negative and considered "uncomfortable" like TS said, people need to have more open minds.

 

[TJ Dillashank]

No pics?

OP must be gay

 

[Halifax]

I didn't say you needed to get excited about it, just that it shouldn't necessarily be a negative and considered "uncomfortable" like TS said, people need to have more open minds.

 

[I Am Legion]

I love when films that are supposed to be about female empowerment actually take that power away and jumps over the line to exploitation. Hollywood elites are so fucking stupid.

 

[zuffazombee]

Right?

Rotten tomatoes trashes a lot of quality movies and praises a lot of shit movies. It's a bunch of pretentious bored critics trying to always say "unoriginal" to everything and praise anything they deem different or new.

This is sooooooo wrong.
RT does nothing more than tabulate reviews by accredited critics & the general public.

RT doesn't "trash a lot of quality movies and praises a lot of shit movies" as they aren't the ones publishing reviews. They simply determine whether a critic's review of a specific film is "fresh" (good) or "rotten" (bad).

You can argue (rightfully, so) their formula is flawed but you can't blame them for the reviews.

Now, if you rely on RT without undetstanding how they determine a "fresh" or "rotten" film, then you've got no one to blame but yourself.

Also, reviews are linked on the RT website & are available for you to read. If you're only looking at the "Tomato-meter", then that too is your fault.

 

[Wilmer Digreux]

 

[SKYNET]

Emma Stone in a boring and pretentious movie that received high marks on Rotten Tomatoes turns out to be a dud?

 

[milliniar]

How in the hell did you get all the way to 2024 and still have any faith in Rotten Tomatoes?

How do you get to 2024 and not understand how rotten tomatoes works?
There is nothing you need to trust, it just tracks reviews and posts how many are positive.
find the reviewers who align with your taste and follow them.