pretty much this, and even werdum was pretty old and has been around forever.
Werdum was 38/39 and was fighting for 15 years when Stipe beat him, what's the difference between him and DC?
DC looked like he was fighting in mud in all his fights in his return to HW
So you basically rewrited history lol, werdun was the fucking champion and dc showed no sings of slowing downIf you look at most of Stipe's opponents they were the wrong side of 35 and if you look at their history most of them were much better fighters 5 years previously.
Francis was young and dangerous but he'd be a tougher match up now.
DC had all the skills but his body's starting to slow down he was already past the date he'd set for his own retirement.
Overeem and JDS were 5 years past their best. Werdum was Champ but he was 39 years old, not many guys are prime at 40.
I consider young JDS to have had the best streak at HW in UFC, beat most of these guys closer to their actual primes and JDS himself wasn't the same after those wars with Cain.
Werdum was caugh on steroids so there is a good chance he was even doping against stipe, and dc literally had only lost to jones before stipe, age doesnt say anything about a fighters "prime" rory mcdonald is young but he's carrer is basically over. You are basically rewriting history based on nothing but your opinion
1000% wrong? I’ll have to check with my high school math teacher but I don’t think that’s a real thing. OOPS, you’ve caught me and revealed my true age of 15 using some sort of reverse psychology, which I actually plan on majoring in college in a few years. LOL I can you see you just pounding away on your keyboard with your big stubby fingers in a rage over what someone says on the internet with steam comin outta your ears. Put on your clown shoes and take the local public transportation to the library (if you know where that is) and read up on how behavior (and thus performance which we would then use to determine a human’s prime) is measured. Certainly we’d have to operationally define all those terms to eliminate subjectivity, determine criteria for interobserver agreement and most importantly determine what experimental design will be most effective in isolating the variables to determine the individual’s ‘prime.’ I’d go for a single subject design because as you know, people are individuals and not groups and putting all people in the same group as they develop differently would be scientifically irresponsible. You seem like you’re old hat with experimental design and behavior measurement so we don’t need to go over that in much more detail. Well, I’ve got to go and put on some zit cream for my 15 year old face and study for my drivers exam. Let me know how your trip to the library goes! This thread is lit, fam!
