Political Betting Thread

longway said:
Is that a strong view/feeling of yours?

There is plenty of objective evidence on this thread that this not the case. Its not even logical.

Could it be that I have objective reasons to strongly support one candidate over another? Feelings and views are not the same are they?

Feelings are more prone to subjectivity, I will grant you that, but you make it seem like its a mathematical equation.

Your assertion is not remotely objective, yet I cant imagine you have strong views on it one way or another.
Click to expand...

It's a generalization that I'd assert holds true far more often than not. But no, it's not a mathematical equation that is 100% accurate.

In fact, it's a difficult discussion to have period, because objectivity has to be determined by someone. And since we all hold biases, it's not really even possible to be sure what's objective and what isn't. It's all based on perspective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: t6p
mkess101 said:
It's a generalization that I'd assert holds true far more often than not. But no, it's not a mathematical equation that is 100% accurate.

In fact, it's a difficult discussion to have period, because objectivity has to be determined by someone. And since we all hold biases, it's not really even possible to be sure what's objective and what isn't. It's all based on perspective.
Click to expand...

I understand where you are coming from obviously.

I agree more when it comes to being emotionally invested in a position, and being unable or unwilling to divorce yourself from your emotions, not so much when it comes to having strong views. That doesnt even make any sense.

On a personal level i really want trump to win, but i am assessing his chances pretty objectively imo.

I disagreed with other posters on here, but i judged the line movement on trump in betfair perfectly on this occasion.

Mma betting wise, we all grapple with reality, and the proof of our objectivity comes from being a profitable long term bettor.
 
Last edited:
The current escalation of dnc cultivated rioting and looting are going to continue to erode hiden's chances.

These riots are becoming incresingly important to voters.

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pu...n_on_violent_protests_most_democrats_disagree

All the dnc had to do was not openly support crazed lunatics hellbent on destroying the usa from within. But no, they couldnt even manage that very well.

They are a ruin of a party.
 
longway said:
You might want to consider that the dnc plan is to remove Biden after a couple of years and install Khamaleon. Then she can still potentially run for 2 terms. So you are faced with 2 years of Hiden, followed by 10 years of Embarris. Thats 12 years of neoliberalism ie war, globalisation, censorship and the decimation of the middle class all hidden behind a thin veneer of id poitics. You will not get m4a or free tuition.

Or you can get 4 more years of Trump and then put up a real progressive to replace him in 2024.
Click to expand...
You realize that only one president in the history of the US has resigned? Biden is not going to get elected and resign two years in.
 
I thought this was a political BETTING thread, not a trump propaganda thread. I can’t even locate the last post that was related to betting.
 
Antifa/blm/assorted anti-trump weirdos chanting 'death to america'.



The ads write themselves.
 
Bjjpitbull8 said:
I thought this was a political BETTING thread, not a trump propaganda thread. I can’t even locate the last post that was related to betting.
Click to expand...

The post directly above your first post. It had a link to a poll of us voter attitudes to the current rioting. There are several posts not long previously showing the history of the presidential betting odds and another linking to a new cyrpto betting site.

What is the propaganda you are referring to anyway?
 
Last edited:
Bjjpitbull8 said:
You realize that only one president in the history of the US has resigned? Biden is not going to get elected and resign two years in.
Click to expand...

At this point what difference does it make? He is suffering from cognitive decline and being hidden from the public aside from carefully managed appreances. He did an interview on cnn recently and was clearly reading from a script, and still got things wrong. The guy is a mess.



Just bc the dnc is a unmitigated disaster of a party doesnt mean its propaganda, and its all relevant to betting.
 
longway said:
That can be levelled at anyone on here. You said there has been no hint of objectivity, or similar, that's ridiculous, and in any objective sense, wrong.

I'm not neutral though, and don't pretend to be otherwise.

The other guy makes similarly baseless claims about my posts, and uses words like betray and shill as if I am trying to deceive people in some way.
Click to expand...
“Betray” Is in no way pejorative. I don’t think you’re deceitful and nothing I’ve posted suggests that.
 
Ryan Kelly said:
“Betray” Is in no way pejorative. I don’t think you’re deceitful and nothing I’ve posted suggests that.
Click to expand...

Apart from you calling me a shill and stating i have betrayed myself in some way. But i accept your post in good faith.
 
longway said:
At this point what difference does it make? He is suffering from cognitive decline and being hidden from the public aside from carefully managed appreances. He did an interview on cnn recently and was clearly reading from a script, and still got things wrong. The guy is a mess.
Click to expand...

he has an iq > 100 and isn’t driven only by self interest. That’s more than enough for a lot of people.
 
longway said:
Apart from you calling me a shill and stating i have betrayed myself in some way. But i accept your post in good faith.
Click to expand...
You are a shill. All you post is shit about how awesome Trump is and what a retard Biden is. Also, there is more than one definition of the word. Betray: to reveal; be evidence of. Hope that clears it up.
 
If i said the dnc was mostly peaceful, would that be propaganda?
 
Ryan Kelly said:
You are a shill. All you post is shit about how awesome Trump is and what a retard Biden is. Also, there is more than one definition of the word. Betray: to reveal; be evidence of. Hope that clears it up.
Click to expand...

Not really, as a shill requires deceit. Betray requires me to be hiding something.

You have stated i am doing neither.

Whats the shit you have an objection to? Do you have any counterpoints or are you just here to call me names and being abusive? You can put me on mute.
 
Ryan Kelly said:
he has an iq > 100 and isn’t driven only by self interest. That’s more than enough for a lot of people.
Click to expand...
Incredibly objective and insightful. Wow.

It's his entire platform, not being trump. His iq at this stage may not even be at that level.

i can see who is the one being deceptive here. You seem to be very emotionally invested in hiden winning.

I was right about you being a concern troll.
 
longway said:
Incredibly objective and insightful. Wow.

It's his entire platform, not being trump. His iq at this stage may not even be at that level.

i can see who is the one being deceptive here. You seem to be very emotionally invested in hiden winning.

I was right about you being a concern troll.
Click to expand...
Sorry I broke up your party of trumptards jacking each other off.
 
Ryan Kelly said:
I literally just provided you w the definition of betray. Read it again.
Click to expand...

You might need to sit down for this.

You dont define words.

The context in which you used betray is unintentionally reveal. It requires me to be hiding something.

You dont know the meanings of the words shill or betray. Or you are being deceitful by using them.

You come across as pretty childish so far.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,234
Messages
57,976,462
Members
175,889
Latest member
MEthzale

Share this page

Back
Top