- Joined
- Oct 13, 2012
- Messages
- 21,156
- Reaction score
- 32,850
By his own admission, Stephen King is the literary equivalent of a Big Mac. I just read his 1963 book not too long ago. It actually started out fairly well for the first 300 pages, then turned to utter shit. The sex scenes were some of the most hilariously awful pieces of writing I've ever come across.
Dick is a much, much better writer. And has better adaptions as well. Although King has had movies made based on his works which are a lot better than his literature actually is. Stuff like The Mist is cool stuff. No Total Recall, though.
Kubrick's directing was, and some scenes....like the one at the bar are absolutely fantastic....but that whole telepathic bit between the kid and the black guy just come across as cheesy. And not cool cheesy, just cheesy.
Dick is a much, much better writer. And has better adaptions as well. Although King has had movies made based on his works which are a lot better than his literature actually is. Stuff like The Mist is cool stuff. No Total Recall, though.
kubrick doing the shining was a masterpiece
Kubrick's directing was, and some scenes....like the one at the bar are absolutely fantastic....but that whole telepathic bit between the kid and the black guy just come across as cheesy. And not cool cheesy, just cheesy.
Last edited: