Social Pelosi’s house broken into, husband assaulted

I'm still on page 1.

No way that one of the most powerful and richest political figures in the US doesn't have Fort Knox level security. Something's off. No way this was just a random crime.

thats his wife.

sure this guy's got money but for the most part he just wants to be left alone. if he has any security detail he probably wouldn't have ever gotten that DUI.
 
Assailant's name is David Depape

DePape was booked on various charges, including attempted homicide, assault with a deadly weapon, elder abuse, burglary among others, San Francisco Police Chief William Scott said in a news conference.

DePape, 42, is from Berkeley, California.

He grew up in Canada, in Powell River, British Columbia, according to CNN.

DePape was a nudity activist in California
While in California, DePape was an activist who promoted public nudity in 2011 and 2012, California state Sen. Scott Wiener, recalled and told the San Francisco Chronicle.

DePape lived with Gypsy Taub, another nude activist, and her family. The Chronicle identified DePape in 2013 as a “hemp jewelry maker,” and “father figure” to Taub’s three children.

The group that DePape lived with also promoted conspiracy theories at the time, including the theory that 9/11 was “an inside job,” the Chronicle reported.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/10/28/david-depape-what-we-know/10626002002/

1200x0.jpg

Definitely a right-winger.
 
I'm still on page 1.

No way that one of the most powerful and richest political figures in the US doesn't have Fort Knox level security. Something's off. No way this was just a random crime.
Sounds like an inside job but I know very little about the incident, TBH.
Edit: obviated by new info
 
Last edited:
I'm still on page 1.

No way that one of the most powerful and richest political figures in the US doesn't have Fort Knox level security. Something's off. No way this was just a random crime.

not only that, it was by a homeless drug addict in their underware. Enjoy the thread bro
 
JAN6---Drool-small.gif
JAN6---Drool-small.gif
JAN6---Drool-small.gif


do you still believe the election was stolen? why don't you let go of that ghost and tell us who rightfully won the 2020 election?

what do you think those unarmed (Jan. 6 rioter who brought guns onto US Capitol grounds sentenced to 5 years in jail) capitol rioters were trying to do? prevent the election from being certified for the rightful president? or maybe those maga muppets just went in there to shake mike pence's hand and give nancy pelosi a hug. yeah, thats gotta be it alright.

i know! maybe these brave patriots who stand for law and order and democracy were simply just going to peacefully hang their vice president on the gallows they put up outfront, after they beat up a bunch of police officers with back the blue flags and forced their way into the building?

don't you worry though. just like all of those capitol rioters who got their stupid asses thrown in jail on account of their fetish for a con man who threw them under the bus just to pardon the guy who stolen their wall money, this guy who assaulted and attempted to murder paul pelosi will have it real good from day one in prison after D-Bo and Bubba drop that honeybun on his pillow.

at least the capitol rioters will still live to see the outsides of a cell. too bad that these pathetic maga muppets earned themselves a criminal record that will haunt them for the rest of their lives. after getting their stupid asses arrested for their parts in the capitol riots and then becoming another inmates wife just to own the libs, they will no longer be able to gain meaningful employment or travel abroad. some of them might not even be able to vote. getting them cheeks clapped in jail and then flipping hamburgers for the rest of their lives, all while mike pence sat back down and certified the election for brandon. yeah they really owned the libs there skeeter! they sure did!

you should be feeling glad that the person responsible for his violent crimes against paul pelosi will be facing the consequences for his own actions, much like all the rest of those capitol rioters. law and order baby. back the blue! the party of personal accountability!
Way to ramble, bro. Those rioters weren't a threat to anything as evidences by how the police calmly and welcomely allowed them in.
 
thats his wife.

sure this guy's got money but for the most part he just wants to be left alone. if he has any security detail he probably wouldn't have ever gotten that DUI.
Being left alone and anonymous isn't an option. His wife is literally one of the most powerful people in the planet.
 
I'm still on page 1.

No way that one of the most powerful and richest political figures in the US doesn't have Fort Knox level security. Something's off. No way this was just a random crime.

Apparently you can just put on your underwear and head over to the residence of the Speaker of the House and get inside without issue.
 
Yea, I don’t really like how this all goes down, especially in the WR. It’s always the same thing:
-Event breaks
-Each side guesses the other side did it or at least the type of person who did it is opposite of them
-Criminal is revealed
-One side tags it onto the whole opposing side. The other brings up past events where it worked out for them.


I think it would be better with this angle
-Assume the attacker is deranged and does not represent the average voter from the opposite side. The desire to do that should be restrained.
-Unify in agreement political violence isn’t okay and condemn it. If the person doesn’t truly represent your side, you should be fine condemning them. Don’t defend/ excuse it for concern it is somehow tied to you.
-Move on

To much of the political landscape is going to one’s selective corner, making a characture of the opposing side and then arguing against that charactures perceived viewpoints. Events like this make it far to easy to fall into. This isn’t to say criticism for an opposing viewpoint is bad. I’m just saying be charitable in listening the opposing side and not assuming evil intentions.
If people make moronic predictions with certainty in the beginning before all the info comes out I think its perfectly fair and good to rub their noses in it once they've been proven wrong. I remember the Quebec mosque shooting being a good example, lots of morons were pushing the narrative that the shooter couldn't be white because otherwise they would've released his name and photo immediately and therefore it had to have been a Muslim perpetrator only for the suspect to have been a white nationalist in the end. Rebel Media ran with the original claims of Muslim suspects for weeks after that, trying to push some CT. Actors like that should be shamed.
I'm still on page 1.

No way that one of the most powerful and richest political figures in the US doesn't have Fort Knox level security. Something's off. No way this was just a random crime.
Nancy herself is in DC on the other side of the country.
 
Do not make comments condoning the actions here. I dont want to give out any more cards because of this thread. We have a pop-up on the WR subforum that clearly states that condoning violence or genocide is strictly against the rules.


Violence/Genocide- Do not condone violence or genocide on a person or group of people. You are free to attack a person or groups ideas but you are crossing the line when calling for violence. This will be heavily enforced in threads with breaking news involving victims. If you choose to celebrate the victims injuries and/or deaths or suggest they deserved what happened to them, you will likely get infractions.
Examples: Israel vs. Palestine threads, Mass Shooting threads
 
You think this is normal

There are 50-plus Walgreens locations in the city now. The ones that closed were not reporting a high amount of shoplifting so most people think the explanation is bullshit. But either way, you learn more about relative levels of crime in a place by looking at data than sensationalist videos. Surely you agree with that, right?
 
Way to ramble, bro. Those rioters weren't a threat to anything as evidences by how the police calmly and welcomely allowed them in.
The rioters weren't a threat to anything, Is that why over 140 officers were injured during the Jan 6 insurrection?
 
What an outlandish story. I know poor people that have better security, literally poor people.
 
Way to ramble, bro. Those rioters weren't a threat to anything as evidences by how the police calmly and welcomely allowed them in.

106828932-1611356814485-sabol.jpg


_119080654_gettyimages-1230455457-594x594.jpg






the cops let them in calmly and welcomly alright! they just let them walk in there, orderly and single file, just to take a peaceful stroll through a building that was closed for visitors while congress was in session.

none of these 870+ people who were arrested for their participation in the capitol riots have dared to make that kind of argument in their legal defense. strange!!! why is that? if that was really what happened, then the insubordinate treasonist cops would all be getting hauled off to jail, and the people who went in there, peacefully and welcomly of course after peacefully beating the cops down with back the blue flags,would all be off the hook for this minor incident where hundreds of cops got assaulted.

why isn't any of the rioters being charged actually trying to make that argument? why is it only the cheerleading chuds who are using it as an excuse to try to defend their violent criminal actions? are these convicted criminals hiring attorneys who are working for the deep state and wanting to see them convicted? why arent they making this genius argument???

i mean thats the truth of what happened right? i guess their clients would rather get reemed out in jail and prison and throw the rest of their lives away and flip hamberders for the rest of their sorry lives rather than to go into a courtroom and tell what really went on that day. in that case the truth would have set them free, but nobody so far has dared to even make such a claim in court.

you know the truth though. you know what happened! you should go represent the maga trrash in court. tell them what really happened skeeter! now is your chance to own the libs and save america!

the party of law and order and personal accountability right here everybody. look at this chud right here simping for a bunch of dudes who played Mr. Dressup and beat up a bunch of cops and calling themselves patriots while trying to shit all over democracy. diaper don could fuck this mans wife right in front of him and he'd still get his vote. probably even his money!

sure diaper don wouldn't even put a dollar on any of those maga prisoners commissary books. in fact, he even pardoned the guy who stole some of their wall money instead of any of them. but i'm sure that diaper don cares more about you than he does about all of the rest of that fine spectrum of maga trash that gotten their stupid asses arrested after storming into the capitol to take back their country, so keep on simping for him and get those donations in too! daddy loves you!
 
Last edited:
Yea, 70s were much worse. Still, I don’t like some recent events that have cropped up. This, Kavanaugh, house reps softball game. Then you have group incivility with Jan 6th. I don’t put the riots the summer before in the same camp but would say I was disappointed in how they were observed at that time. There’s been some wacky stuff. Hell, I think someone ever landed a small helecopter in front of the capital building to go in and hand them his manefesto. I don’t think that one was violent though, just unhinged.

Exactly. The level is low compared to the '70s but the trend is really bad. I also think you're seeing more high-level involvement, like Trump himself encouraging election CTs, and a lot of elected officials backing it. Not aware of that happening during the '70s (though correct me if there was something similar then).
 
Nancy herself is in DC on the other side of the country.
Plant a listening device
Plant a bomb
Search the house for anything to use as leverage
Hide and wait to kidnap her
Damage the house out of spite

There's all sorts of things people would do if given the opportunity. There's no way her house is left unsecured even if she's gone. Unless people are dumber than I think.

Her being one of the most important people on the planet makes her home a security issue to the nation. I don't know how it can be left unsecured no matter who is or isn't there.
 
Back
Top