- Joined
- Feb 6, 2009
- Messages
- 61,000
- Reaction score
- 370
Kitsch is box office poison.
Nah, those movies were box office poison. It had nothing to do with him. I don't care who you put in those roles; John Carter and Battleship were god freaking awful, and everybody could tell they were gonna be awful from the trailers. Savages has made back its money. The guy has genuine star power, but I don't think he's a very good actor, and I don't think there will ever again be a role as perfect for him that will hide this fact as seamlessly as Tim Riggins. They haven't yet figured out his star persona. Maybe he'd be better as a villain. The laconic athlete role was just the right porridge, but there aren't a ton of those to go around on the silver screen.
Honestly man, i would put my money that you are a more convincing 47 than Walker.
The fact that you're black may get in the way, but at least the movie would appeal to more, erm, "Urban" audiences.
Watching this right now, the guy playing Agent 47 looks absolutely ridiculous and like one of the most least intimidating assassins, ever.
You can say the same about Paul Walker. He's damn near robotic in every role. I think he can pull off emotionless fairly well.
NooooooooooosHas it been long enough to where I can say Paul Walker had no acting ability whatsoever? He lucked into the role of a lifetime. He could've been replaced with any generic blonde guy and would've made no noticeable difference to the Fast and Furious franchise.
Pop the hoodHas it been long enough to where I can say Paul Walker had no acting ability whatsoever? He lucked into the role of a lifetime. He could've been replaced with any generic blonde guy and would've made no noticeable difference to the Fast and Furious franchise.