Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot Video

[Pittie Petey]

LoL, pathetic argument. $8000 was a ballpark figure. $8000 or $8494 present value, is a ridiculous amount for these two men to pay this clown. His story, like your argument has no merit.

What argument?
Math isnt really an opinion, its pretty much based in fact now days

 

[SuperHoss]

What argument?
Math isnt really an opinion, its pretty much based in fact now days

It is an estimate, not a precise measurement. It is not a bond with a specific rate that has reached maturity, it is an estimate of the current value of an alleged payment from years ago.

Either sum seems like a large amount for two guys in unfortunate circumstances to give to a third party to star in a video nobody knew that anybody would believe, let alone become the cultural phenomenon it has become.

It is hard to believe the video is real, but it's staying power speaks to the difficulty skeptics have had disproving it's authenticity.

 

[Pittie Petey]

It is an estimate, not a precise measurement. It is not a bond with a specific rate that has reached maturity, it is an estimate of the current value of an alleged payment from years ago.

Either sum seems like a large amount for two guys in unfortunate circumstances to give to a third party to star in a video nobody knew that anybody would believe, let alone become the cultural phenomenon it has become.

It is hard to believe the video is real, but it's staying power speaks to the difficulty skeptics have had disproving it's authenticity.

None of this has anything to do with my post
I'll ask again since you didnt seem to understand the first time, what argument am I making that has no merit?

 

[StewDogg11]

When did I lie ?

* If I was incorrect in thinking it was $2000 and it was actually $1000, my point still stands.
$1000 in 1967 is worth $8,494.49 in today's money. Bob claims he was paid this much to walk in front of the screen. Patterson and Gimlin did not have that type of money, nor would they or anyone pay anyone that much just to walk in front of a screen.

Um no it’s not but I’m convinced you can’t logically and without bias comprehend it.

 

[StewDogg11]

This doesnt change what you said a few minutes ago
The problem here aint the math, the problem is youve changed your story 3 times in the past hour
Makes you seem untrustworthy and not someone who actually knows what theyre talking about

Wait until you read his analysis on Pit Bulls that says they were bred to pull sneak attacks.

 

[Pittie Petey]

Wait until you read his analysis on Pit Bulls that says they were bred to pull sneak attacks.

Did they creep up on you from behind and throw salt in your eyes like Mr Fuji?

 

[StewDogg11]

Did they creep up on you from behind and throw salt in your eyes like Mr Fuji?

 

[SuperHoss]

None of this has anything to do with my post
I'll ask again since you didnt seem to understand the first time, what argument am I making that has no merit?

That the credibility of the OP is suspect because he provided three different estimates of the current value of a payment from 50 years ago.

 

[StewDogg11]

That the credibility of the OP is suspect because he provided three different estimates of the current value of a payment from 50 years ago.

Or the fact he claimed the Bob guy said he received $2,000 when in fact he said he only received $1,000.

 

[Pittie Petey]

That the credibility of the OP is suspect because he provided three different estimates of the current value of a payment from 50 years ago.

No, I was pointing out the ridiculousness of him saying $2,000 then was worth $8,000 now but $1,000 then is worth $8,4000 now
It was a hilarious rib on his terrible math skills
I guess you both need to brush up on them comprehensions a bit

 

[SuperHoss]

Hopefully OP gets the message that it is best to fact check before posting, or a troll with way too much time on their hands may hijack the thread on a technicality.

 

[Pittie Petey]

Hopefully OP gets the message that it is best to fact check before posting, or a troll with way too much time on their hands may hijack the thread on a technicality.

A valuable lesson was learned today

 

[Oregonmma]

I'm not saying I necessarily think that footage is real but if it's a fake it's a damn good fake for 1967. Also the fact that no one has ever recreated it with it being such a popular piece of film is intriguing.

 

[RentPayer]

Hopefully OP gets the message that it is best to fact check before posting, or a troll with way too much time on their hands may hijack the thread on a technicality.

The fact he’s trying to discredit me based on misuse of numbers instead of disproving the footage proves his insecurity. I consider this a great victory in defense of the video’s authenticity. He knows it’s legit, which is why he tries to deflect from it by asserting inaccurate inflation values have merit. The PG footage is real !

 

[Sirwastealot]

29

What argument?
Math isnt really an opinion, its pretty much based in fact now days

You're wrong and here's why.

$2000 in 1967 would be equal to $8000 today.

It makes no sense that yokels back then would pay the equivalent of $10,000 for 1 hour's work.

Why would anyone pay some nobody $20,000 just to wear a suit?

It's common sense. No one in their right mind would willingly give $50,000 for 30 minutes of work. It's a ridiculous amount.

 

[Pittie Petey]

29


You're wrong and here's why.

$2000 in 1967 would be equal to $8000 today.

It makes no sense that yokels back then would pay the equivalent of $10,000 for 1 hour's work.

Why would anyone pay some nobody $20,000 just to wear a suit?

It's common sense. No one in their right mind would willingly give $50,000 for 30 minutes of work. It's a ridiculous amount.

This popped me
Well done, sir

<Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo>

 

[2fast2see]

Great fake!

That's all!

 

[StewDogg11]

The fact he’s trying to discredit me based on misuse of numbers instead of disproving the footage proves his insecurity. I consider this a great victory in defense of the video’s authenticity. He knows it’s legit, which is why he tries to deflect from it by asserting inaccurate inflation values have merit. The PG footage is real !

Why would anyone be scared of Bigfeet being real? It’s not like one has actually ever harmed anyone.

 

[Spounman]

Why would anyone be scared of Bigfeet being real? It’s not like one has actually ever harmed anyone.

https://popculturista.com/p/the-mystery-of-the-alaskan-killer-bigfoot

 

[DanSavage]

Bob is a liar, and I can prove it. He claimed back in 2001 that P and G paid him $2000 to wear the suit - which even back in 1967 was a ridiculous amount. But he forgot about inflation because back in 1967, $2000 was worth $6000 in 2001 value ! He's lying.

Okay. Let;s see the proof of what you're saying.