Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot Video

I would rather die than have kids, pal. Why would I want to compromise my own life, I enjoy it too much as it is. So you're safe there, don't worry. Not a shred of shame or embarassment here mate - why would I be? It's no different from reading sci-fi or fantasy novels etc.
It’s fairy tales and ya you said it fantasy, these animals don’t fucking exist anymore , deal with it.
 
It’s fairy tales and ya you said it fantasy, these animals don’t fucking exist anymore , deal with it.

indonesia_coelacanth_2.jpg

not really wanting to get into this argument but have a close minded day pal
 
indonesia_coelacanth_2.jpg

not really wanting to get into this argument but have a close minded day pal
That’s because the ocean depths are hard for humans to explore.

giant apes in a fucking forest aren’t going to be hiding and not found all these years no matter how big and elusive the forest is.

The last giant ape larger than the gorilla was Giagantopithecus and it’s extinct , deal with it. You are the close-minded one disrespecting the fossil records.
 
That’s because the ocean depths are hard for humans to explore.

giant apes in a fucking forest aren’t going to be hiding and not found all these years no matter how big and elusive the forest is.

The last giant ape larger than the gorilla was Giagantopithecus and it’s extinct , deal with it. You are the close-minded one disrespecting the fossil records.
Always a qualifier with you guys
Always
 
More ad hominem Learn to argue effectively you schlep
No matter what side you're on: this is pretty hilarious. I mean.

The funny thing is believing the Bigfoot conversation ever gets above THIS level. Try as though they might.
 
Lol at cryptozoology you should be ashamed and embarrassed. Please don’t spread the same fairy tales to your children for society’s sake.
You probably believe the pterodactyl still exits rofl.

They do. I've seen one flying around. Might have been a turkey vulture.
That’s because the ocean depths are hard for humans to explore.

giant apes in a fucking forest aren’t going to be hiding and not found all these years no matter how big and elusive the forest is.

The last giant ape larger than the gorilla was Giagantopithecus and it’s extinct , deal with it. You are the close-minded one disrespecting the fossil records.

Plenty of land animals thought extinct have been found too.
 
That’s because the ocean depths are hard for humans to explore.

giant apes in a fucking forest aren’t going to be hiding and not found all these years no matter how big and elusive the forest is.

The last giant ape larger than the gorilla was Giagantopithecus and it’s extinct , deal with it. You are the close-minded one disrespecting the fossil records.


You keep saying apes. A significant percentage of people who have sightings say they are not apes but a kind of person. In any case when discussing the viability of these beings being able to hide from humans the reportedly high degree of intelligence combined with vastly superior senses and reported nocturnal activity must be taken into account if we are being honest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That’s because the ocean depths are hard for humans to explore.

giant apes in a fucking forest aren’t going to be hiding and not found all these years no matter how big and elusive the forest is.

The last giant ape larger than the gorilla was Giagantopithecus and it’s extinct , deal with it. You are the close-minded one disrespecting the fossil records.
How would you know how vast the forest wilderness is when you're too busy being a keyboard warrior ?
 
I like how you bring shit up but then scurry away and avoid the subject or try to minimize through ad hominem

guess the prez must be rubbing off on you
More ad hominem Learn to argue effectively you schlep
How would you know how vast the forest wilderness is when you're too busy being a keyboard warrior ?
The Bigfoot Believer™ ..... mysterious even to itself ..... in its own habitat .... listen closely to its plaintive calls .....

..... these are but the last three known sightings on record .....
 
You keep saying apes. A significant percentage of people who have sightings say they are not apes but a kind of person. In any case when discussing the viability of these beings being able to hide from humans the reportedly high degree of intelligence combined with vastly superior senses and reported nocturnal activity must be taken into account if we are being honest.

Never understood the thought that you can just prance into the woods and find whatever animal you want.

Dumb ass deer can still easily avoid humans. If not hunters wouldn't need treestands, deer piss and deer calls. Youd just walk with your rifle and shoot one. Then we move on to bear, even better than deer at avoiding humans, to the point a bear could be right next to you and you might not know it.


Snow leapords I'm pretty sure they started using special cameras in order to detect them because they are very hard for humans to see. From most of the decent bigfoot videos I've seen they seem to blend in with the forest very well.

Now take into account what you said about their intelligence and you start to realize that expecting to find one so easily is pretty dumb.
 
Now take into account what you said about their intelligence and you start to realize that expecting to find one so easily is pretty dumb.
It's just that there's this video that indicates none of that. I don't know if you've seen it.....
 
The shirt video?
So you're telling me you don't see a shirt but do see high level evasion and brains? Look how nimbly it traverses rocky terrain?

Am I the only one who thinks it's ridiculous to think the lack of one thing is proof of something else?
  • Just because a video can't be disproven, doesn't mean it's true.
  • Just because Bigfoot was only caught once on camera doesn't mean he wised up.
Are these not specious connections?
 
So you're telling me you don't see a shirt but do see high level evasion and brains? Look how nimbly it traverses rocky terrain?

Am I the only one who thinks it's ridiculous to think the lack of one thing is proof of something else?
  • Just because a video can't be disproven, doesn't mean it's true.
  • Just because Bigfoot was only caught once on camera doesn't mean he wised up.
Are these not specious connections?

I wouldn't say that assuming an ape is intelligent is speculation id call it very likely since every great ape we know of is.

I wouldn't compare it to wondering if bigfoot tucks in his shirt or not.
 
Back
Top