To hell with all that. Just toss the little fuckers in and see what happens.Pool alarms, door alarms, or other alert methods are pretty cheap these days...
Yep, that's how it looks like to me. Stuff like this along with the videoing it for social media just screams attention seeking to me. And I guarantee that their reply to criticism would be something along the lines of "parents coddle their children too much nowadays. cry harder snowflakes".I think some parents, see it a parent flex. They feel it makes them look like an old school disciplinary, no coddling nonsense throwback, in opposition to today's 'weak', 'coddling' parents.
And while i do believe there are absolutely way too many 'weak' 'coddling' parents, i think do not think these people are the reasonable counter to them. They are the opposite problem in the spectrum, imo.
it's called a "float test"Yep, that's how it looks like to me. Stuff like this along with the videoing it for social media just screams attention seeking to me. And I guarantee that their reply to criticism would be something along the lines of "parents coddle their children too much nowadays. cry harder snowflakes".
The whole 'coddling' narrative is just a way to shift from the conversation. It's like defending not washing your hands or going to the dentist, or going to work at your office job while you have the flu.
Of all the lessons you can teach a child about strength, 'throw scared kid that can barely speak and walk into pool' is probably one of the shittiest lesson plans you could start with.
If you have a pool at your house, you're rich enough to get your kid actual swimming lessons.
It’s necessary if you own a pool. 350 kids a year drown in pools, and if you don’t own a pool, you don’t need to worry, but if you do, accidents happen.
Yep, that's how it looks like to me. Stuff like this along with the videoing it for social media just screams attention seeking to me. And I guarantee that their reply to criticism would be something along the lines of "parents coddle their children too much nowadays. cry harder snowflakes".
yes but the point i am making is there is another way to get this done that does not involve traumatizing the child and putting them to 'sink or swim test'.maybe it is, maybe it isnt, the local swim schools in california do this, and it's to teach the kids to float. A backyard pool is just as cruel when a kid accidentally falls in, sinks, and drowns.
part of the swim lesson is to get accidentally bumped into the pool and float, it is explained, and all of the parents are in on it, the instructor will make it happen, and this was before phones and recordings got really prevalent, 2010's
If I had kids, I would start punching them in the face early so they learn how to defend themselves.So do you think all the parents and swim programs that do not use that method and instead teach the kids to swim without putting them to the 'sink or swim' deliberate trauma test are somehow failing their kids?
Ok.If I had kids, I would start punching them in the face early so they learn how to defend themselves.
I'm just joking of course. I said in my post that you quoted that I would be worried such a method would traumatize the kid and develop phobia of water, which would defeat the purpose of him learning to swim.
But I would rather people use this method than the opposite of not having them learn how to swim at all. There is value in this kind of training, but probably should do it when the kid is older and knows that it's training.
it's called a "float test"
it's been going on for decades at least. Some kids will panic regardless, will they survive?
pay attention to the pants and sandals, that's no mistake, it's to mimmick a real life scenario.
it's a standard practice, and it's not like it happens the first day, the video doesnt explain it well, the kids usually already learned how to float unless they are babies, they've already been taught, however, the float test with sandals and pants is to see if they can instinctually float when surprised, when no one is around to help. Some places will differ on how they perform the test.
This about sums it up. If you have a pool in your backyard, you need to drown proof your kids ASAP. If your kids don't have regular access to pools, it's still important but you can do it on your own timeline. We took the latter approach with our kids because we don't have a pool. But half the homes in our neighborhood do, and one of the neighbor's kids down the street drowned in their backyard pool when she was around 3. They found her facedown and don't know how long she was unconscious. She was resuscitated but I don't know if she suffered brain impact and don't know the family well enough to ask. I can guarantee the parents would have taken the OP approach if it would have prevented that incident.
And it's never as simple as "herp derp, if you're rich enough to afford a pool, you're rich enough for swim lessons." Some kids learn drown proofing very quickly, some don't. We took our kids to swim lessons every weekend for almost 2 years before they were properly drown-proofed and that was only because we taught them ourselves at the HOA pool after 2 years of how to do f'ing freestyle and backstroke but NOT how to tread water or backfloat. For the latter, you had to do the drown-proofing course that required minimum 4 days/week in the middle of the day because once/week isn't enough to ingrain proper water confidence. The only kids who could make that class had yoga moms with nothing better to do during the week than take their kids to private lessons.
This is the real issue. The OP vid is something that may not be right for many kids but COULD have been right for that kid given the family's circumstances. It is a private "making the sausage" moment of raising a kid and I don't know why the fuck anyone would post that online. If you're going to do that (and I understand why some wouldn't), at least the woman is calm, supportive and the kid does not panic or struggle once he enters the water, showing he's likely been prepped for this. The woman also "rescues" him twice when he continues to be upset and is always close by for support.
it has maybe physical advantages for the future, but that psychological shock can remain for life, depends on the kid, it can mess someone upThat little bastard knows what to do if he falls in now, he's already experienced the sudden shock and panic of the situation and learned that he can fix the situation and save himself quickly
Good parenting imo
I wouldn't i mean damn there's gotta be better ways to teach your kids to swim right ?!
![]()
Is that you MM?i don't know if it is the 'snowflake' way because there is another outcome that is possible which is the kid becomes so frightened they develop a phobia that then does not allow them swim ever. That may not happen a lot but, when it does, that is a failure compared to teaching them to swim and float without trauma, which can be done at any age.
For instance there is no reason a parent/instructor could not be in that pool, with that child from that video, holding the kid while putting him to float on his back. You keep repeating that until the kid no longer needs the parents/instructors hands. Once the child can float with no help, you then teach them how to hold their breath under water. In our volunteer group we would blow on the child's nose, they would stop breathing and then you go under the water with them. First time is instant in and out and then you lengthen the time over many other dips.
ONce you have a child who learns to hold their breath under water and can float on its back you can drop them or leave them in the pool and they will do it naturally. You will see the kid bobbing around and then flip to their back as they have fun in the water.
it is extreme as the end goal can be accomplished without the trauma but it does take the parent or instructor investing a bit more time (about 1 hour) whereas this 'sink or swim' method requires no time investment and is usually complete in less than 5 minutes.My kids both swim well had lessons at local pool. This seems bit extreme to me?
Not sure what you are asking there Mike but i am very curious what it is you did not like about my post that followed that??Is that you MM?
Oh nothing your av just made me wonder if you were someone that used to post here, that's all.Not sure what you are asking there Mike but i am very curious what it is you did not like about my post that followed that??
let me ask, as i do not know the answer to this. What happens to a person here who admits to being a prior poster who was banned?Oh nothing your av just made me wonder if you were someone that used to post here, that's all.