It's interesting. I've gotten into using AI chatbots a lot lately. I've always been a big user of search engines online. They're far from infallible but pretty useful tools.
I asked Grok about Tom's surgery and it was very much on Tom's side, listing all the information put out by Tom's team. However, if you start asking certain questions, it suddenly becomes a lot less favorable. If you ask about the evidence this Dr on youtube gave showing the picture of Tom under the laser machine, Grok says that surgery for Brown's syndrome to release tendons is not done by lasers. Tom's pictures of bloody red eyes afterwards are more like someone undergoing LASIK as surgery for Brown's tends to lead to red eyes but much milder.
I asked Grok why if Tom had surgery on his tendons for Browns that he wouldn't just say that. Grok notes privacy concerns would be the chief reason. When I point out that it's Tom and his team that are releasing all the "news" online, it suddenly tells me that's a good point and undermines the privacy argument. lol
From Grok.com
Postoperative Appearance and Evidence Beyond Red Eyes
Standard
post-op signs for Brown's syndrome/strabismus surgery on the superior oblique include:
- Mild to moderate redness and swelling (conjunctival injection) from the incision and manipulation.
- Subconjunctival hemorrhage (blood under the conjunctiva, causing red patches).
- Tearing, light sensitivity, foreign body sensation, or temporary double vision changes.
- Possible lid swelling or minor bruising.
- The eye often looks bloodshot/red for days to a week or two, but it's usually less dramatic than full LASIK/LASEK recovery (which can involve more diffuse redness, flap-related haze, or bandage contact lenses).
- No large external scars (incision is tiny and hidden under the lid or conjunctiva).
- Visible evidence might include: Slight ptosis (droop) or lid changes temporarily, but mostly internal/motility-focused—no big external wounds like from orbital surgery.
In Aspinall's case (Feb 2026 at Optegra), he shared
gruesome red/bloody eyes photos ("1 day post-surgery") showing extreme inflammation and subconjunctival hemorrhage. This level of redness is
possible after strabismus/oculoplastic work (especially bilateral, with tissue handling), but it's
more commonly associated with refractive laser procedures like LASEK/PRK (which cause surface disruption and prominent hemorrhage/redness that resolves in 1–2 weeks).
For true Brown's repair (mechanical tendon work), you'd expect
more subtle external signs—redness yes, but often less "horrific" or widespread than what's shown. Additional evidence of "real" Brown's surgery might include:
- Pre/post motility videos (showing improved upward gaze in adduction).
- Orthoptic test results (e.g., field of vision improvements, reduced diplopia).
- Follow-up clinic notes on forced duction changes.
- If silicone expander used, potentially subtle imaging (though not routine).
The photos alone (red eyes + ZEISS MEL 90 laser machine in OR pics) lean toward refractive surgery appearance, which doesn't align with standard Brown's techniques (no laser involved). If it was purely Brown's tendon release, more evidence like motility progress updates or specialist confirmation would help counter doubts—red eyes are common across eye surgeries, but the intensity here matches laser recovery profiles more closely. The opacity continues to fuel questions