- Joined
- Aug 23, 2015
- Messages
- 18,342
- Reaction score
- 8,658
lol me
3rd grade? Damn, we some got young kids on this fucking site. I was 19 when I saw that shit in the theater.
Really? I actually think the 1960s was kind of shitty. Lots of very weird, seemingly drug-induced films from that decade.
But the 70s. . . That's the era where guys like Scorsese, Spielberg, Coppola, Lucas, Stone and the Scott Bros really broke onto the scene. It was like a re-birth of film.
I agree that the 70s was also great, but the 60s also was re-birth for film as it was the decade when directors finally ditched the "stage feel" and innovated a lot of the stuff that the directors you listed would come to know as fundamentals a few years later, much in the way that the drug induced music of the 60s innovated what is now the fundamentals of rock n' roll.
That's an interesting point and I could see how you could arrive there. I suppose the 60s was something of a transition decade, moving from the old, stage-based style of all the previous decades into a newer style of filmmaking that has lead us to where we are today. I do think it was a bit of a rocky transition, but you've given me a new way to think about it.
Damn this takes me back to 3rd grade homie.