Social Ohio high school and sexual writing assignments

[Hellowhosthat]

If this was a random 40 year old man prompting teenage girls the same way over twitter DM, this wouldn't even be an argument. Unfortunately, it's people covered by the teacher's union, so again we have the lefties scrambling to defend pedophiles. Good job, guys, keep it up.

How far do you suppose we are from my prediction of the term "pedophobia" being introduced?

There was an actual movement for it in the 60s so we're a long way from that stage. People are never going to accept paedos though so I wouldn't waste energy worrying about it.

 

[UFCUCF]

Yeah you wouldn’t give a fuck about a kid getting groomed, now would you?
And you wouldn’t give a fuck about the slow rot festering in our society in regards to normalizing absolutely vile and despicable behavior, now would you?

What I’m saying is not an overkill, these idiots were reckless and absolutely punishable for it.

Ok, so what about Matt Gates who actually engaged in a sex act with a minor?

 

[HOLA]

Ok, so what about Matt Gates who actually engaged in a sex act with a minor?

@nostradumbass actually addressed this earlier.

According to him it's less perverted to for a grown man (almost 40) to actually fuck a 17 year old than it is to allow them possession of written material that mentions sex, which you don't even talk to them about.

Yep, and you're at the top of the list happy to defend pedophiles if they're on your "team".

Matt Gaetz is a pervert and child molester if some girl lied and said she was 18, 3 months before she actually was, but free pass for the greatest source of child molestation and coercion telling high school kids to write out sexual fantasies. "whoa whoa, they're almost 17". Jesus Christ.

 

[GoldenWolf87]

The mayor has no authority over the school board. He's just grandstanding. The school board president said none of them plan to resign - they called his bluff. Lo and behold, none have been arrested.

They can't be charged with a crime - child porn! - for giving high school seniors a book of creative writing prompts, some of which dealt with sexual matters, none of which were even used in the curriculum. That's INSANE.

Well pretty sure what they are teaching to the youth is still wrong.

some of which dealt with sexual matters, none of which were even used in the curriculum

I am sorry but something like that shouldn't be accepted. Its one thing to talk about genders, sexuality. Its another telling a story about encouraging it.

The school board president said none of them plan to resign

Than the school board president is a woke person.

 

[HOLA]

Well pretty sure what they are teaching to the youth is still wrong.


But not the other way around.


Than the school board president is a woke person.

I don't know what you're talking about. I'm not too worried about this, since I don't think you do either.

 

[GoldenWolf87]

It has 1,300 ratings on Amazon, only 17 are 1 star, and 9 of those were just written by snowflakes. Overall rating is 4.6.

Had no idea child pornography would be so successful in the Amazon reviews.

lol. Most Ratings are complete nonsense on Amazon.

 

[GoldenWolf87]

I don't know what you're talking about. I'm not too worried about this, since I don't think you do either.

I had being following this CRT stuff for quite a while. The school board was idiotic enough to put that kind of material. Again its one thing to talk about genders, sexuality.

 

[SanchoMF]

No kid was "groomed." Nothing happened. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.

Nothing happened. There was no absolutely vile and despicable behavior. It was a book full of hundreds of writing prompts, for 17 year olds taking a college credit course, in conjunction with a local college. Some of the prompts dealt with sex; none were used in the class. That's slow rot? Vile and despicable behavior? Really? You're on a forum dedicated to men and woman beating each other unconscious, giving each other brain damage on a blood soaked mat - but suddenly sound like a Victorian era nun? Over that? Lies. You wouldn't care if there wasn't some fabricated political angle attached. You're being bamboozled.

One mother made a stink, also calling it "woke" and "social justice." That's gibberish. Throwing out shit she heard on Fox, seeing what sticks.

I'm sure, in a similar position, you would have really gone over all 642 of the prompts with a fine tooth comb, in an effort to tell whether they were satisfactorily puritan enough for the Sister Karens? The book had great reviews on Amazon. About 8 1 star reviews out of 1300 until this story broke. Why was it taught for 6 years? What about the teachers who actually ran the courses?

Why just the school board? It's VERY fashionable to have temper tantrums in front of the school boards these days, regarding masks.

Who to hold accountable if not the school board? Who’s responsibility is it to evaluate and sign of the material or curriculum?
The nature of that sexually explicit material, in that book is grooming when given to the underaged, that’s how grooming works.
And this instance (the fact that the book slip through the cracks and the nature of that assignment in question that wasn’t meant for the students) is part of the slow rot in the society today, which is partly incompetence and out of toughness of people involved in education and academia and partly the political agenda to normalize public sexual behavior, hovering around sexualizing of children.

I’d hold people accountable for being incompetent or for negligence, nothing wrong about that.

And I’d say that the context matters, our karate forum is for violent sports under dedicated rules and not for anything goes including sexualizing kids.
Big difference

 

[Cariñito]

It seems there's been an increasing effort to sexualize children, and it didnt begin with this event. People need to realize this, on a large scale, and soon.

The Obama library tranny reading, the netflix cuties show, Biden, and so on. It's been creeping in, and many have been warning about it - although it often falls onto deaf ears.

There are pedos in high places. Thankfully, there are also people like this mayor who will do their best to have none of it.

Kids have sex way less these days then ever before. I think teen pregnancies peaked in 1957 and then again in like 85 or some shit and then went drastically down.

 

[HOLA]

Again its one thing to talk about genders, sexuality.

It's OK to talk about sexuality, but it's not OK to have a book that has discussions about sexuality you never even talk about?

I"ll add that to:

It's OK to have a guy wearing a skirt read a book to kids but it's not OK for a guy wearing a dress to read a book to kids.

It's OK to fuck a 17 year old, but it's not OK to give them a book that has sexual topics?

 

[HOLA]

Who to hold accountable if not the school board? Who’s responsibility is it to evaluate and sign of the material or curriculum?
The nature of that sexually explicit material, in that book is grooming when given to the underaged, that’s how grooming works.

That's not how grooming works. Grooming is when something is done with the intent to sexually abuse the child in question. Offering a common book of writing prompts to 17 year olds taking a college level course, which included some of a sexual nature, none of which were used, is not an attempt to sexually abuse children.

And this instance (the fact that the book slip through the cracks and the nature of that assignment in question that wasn’t meant for the students)

"Slip through the cracks." LMAO! It was writing prompts about sex - heavens! Were you guys home schooled? Guess what, in public schools they have sex ed classes. They get up there and put condoms on cucumbers for the kids. And the kids jerk off on Pornhub all night long.

is part of the slow rot in the society today, which is partly incompetence and out of toughness of people involved in education and academia and partly the political agenda to normalize public sexual behavior, hovering around sexualizing of children.

You don't even know what the political affiliation of the school board members is. People literally just fabricated teams. It's fantasy. You turned the school board into liberals, turned them into pedophiles, then the Matt Gaetz, Jim Jordan, Roy Moore, Donald Trump chuds feigned outrage. It's fake. Only useful to rabble-rouse the lowest of the low, the complete deplorables, who will just bite into this faux outrage like clods.

I’d hold people accountable for being incompetent or for negligence, nothing wrong about that.

And I’d say that the context matters, our karate forum is for violent sports under dedicated rules and not for anything goes including sexualizing kids.
Big difference

No kids were sexualized. No matter how badly you want it to be so. Which apparently multiple posters here REALLY want. You can wish and wish and wish, but it still didn't happen. The story line is nice. I get it. Sadistic, nefarious liberals, attempt to pervert...no! Worse! They were "grooming" the kids! Worse! It was child pornography! But the party of family values stopped them in their tracks! Hurray!

It's Quixotic. Except - not quite. Don Quixote did it all in good faith. And admitted he was wrong at the end. Two things we don't and won't ever see from our chuds.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

weird assignment. but america in general is weird about sexuality. it seems to exist in a space where you are either the most vanilla misionary position person or a trannie sticking cucumbers up your asshole in front of children, and nothing in between. most porn comes from america but god forbid you are topless on the beach. you can suck dick in raunchy motels while being a celibate pastor preaching modesty or a politician claiming he loves the bible and the nuclear family while fucking hookers and snorting coke in vegas, or some creep doing the diversity and antifa and we love minorities shtick all the while ogling at 12 year old girls in the school and pretending the assignment to write about sex scenes is not a reason to jerk off at home while reading the result.

you are a bunch of fucking hypocrites.

 

[HOLA]

weird assignment. but america in general is weird about sexuality. it seems to exist in a space where you are either the most vanilla misionary position person or a trannie sticking cucumbers up your asshole in front of children, and nothing in between. most porn comes from america but god forbid you are topless on the beach. you can suck dick in raunchy motels while being a celibate pastor preaching modesty or a politician claiming he loves the bible and the nuclear family while fucking hookers and snorting coke in vegas, or some creep doing the diversity and antifa and we love minorities shtick all the while ogling at 12 year old girls in the school and pretending the assignment to write about sex scenes is not a reason to jerk off at home while reading the result.

you are a bunch of fucking hypocrites.

Those are some pretty good writing prompts. I'll take the Trannie and cucumber one. @Amerikuracana will take the nymphette one.

 

[SmilinDesperado]

Some of the prompts are unacceptable according to some parents. They are the legal guardians of those kids, so their say matters. I'm sure there's other parents who wouldn't have cared, but these ones did. There's no point addressing your claim that the mayor and the judge never looked at the book, because that is asinine.

If he called the book akin to "child pornography" then there is no way that the judge or mayor looked at the book. I've seen this series of books myself. It isn't some obscure, edgy book. It's pretty easy to see what happened if they were even vaguely aware of what the situation was. They're complaining about 3 or 4 inappropriate prompts in a book that has 642....and they're acting like the teachers ordered Playboy magazine for the class.
We're also talking about 17 year olds here, not 7 year olds, so the reaction to this is asinine.

At the end of the day, if some parents really have an issue with the book and want to change it, that's fine. But if we're being honest, we know that this isn't really about the book.
As evidenced in this thread, it's just people looking for the "Woke CRT liberal" boogieman.

 

[Tairy Hesticles]

It looks like Mayor just hated the board and wants to weaponize the scandal the get them swept out.

And that shady, vindictive expertise is why he is mayor, and they are but school board peons.

Sociopaths win again.

 

[SanchoMF]

That's not how grooming works. Grooming is when something is done with the intent to sexually abuse the child in question. Offering a common book of writing prompts to 17 year olds taking a college level course, which included some of a sexual nature, none of which were used, is not an attempt to sexually abuse children.

"Slip through the cracks." LMAO! It was writing prompts about sex - heavens! Were you guys home schooled? Guess what, in public schools they have sex ed classes. They get up there and put condoms on cucumbers for the kids. And the kids jerk off on Pornhub all night long.

You don't even know what the political affiliation of the school board members is. People literally just fabricated teams. It's fantasy. You turned the school board into liberals, turned them into pedophiles, then the Matt Gaetz, Jim Jordan, Roy Moore, Donald Trump chuds feigned outrage. It's fake. Only useful to rabble-rouse the lowest of the low, the complete deplorables, who will just bite into this faux outrage like clods.

No kids were sexualized. No matter how badly you want it to be so. Which apparently multiple posters here REALLY want. You can wish and wish and wish, but it still didn't happen. The story line is nice. I get it. Sadistic, nefarious liberals, attempt to pervert...no! Worse! They were "grooming" the kids! Worse! It was child pornography! But the party of family values stopped them in their tracks! Hurray!

It's Quixotic. Except - not quite. Don Quixote did it all in good faith. And admitted he was wrong at the end. Two things we don't and won't ever see from our chuds.

oh yeah how did it go again? Something along the lines of : “write a sex scene you wouldn’t show your mom” and to “rewrite the sex scene from above into one that you’d let your mom read.”
and then encouraging drinking..

Call me old fashioned but I don’t think any sane parent (I say sane because there are tons of misled and irresponsible people with children) would let their underaged kids be exposed to assignments as such and it does raise questions about the competence of anyone letting such material be available to kids. If it’s someone’s responsibility to evaluate what’s suitable for children one could expect them to be held accountable for failing to do so.

Is that sex-Ed to you? It’s a bit different to ask kids to expose their erotic fantasies than to tell kids how babies are made or how to use contraception, don’t you think?

I won’t go into intent of someone writing those assignments if the book was meant for adults : but I do have a problem with the incompetence of giving kids that material and saying that it’s no big deal.
Maybe not to you it’s not a problem but to me it is.

 

[SakurabasEar]

It's OK to talk about sexuality, but it's not OK to have a book that has discussions about sexuality you never even talk about?

I believe the book is prompting them to write out a sex scene that they "wouldn't show their mom". This is alarming and certainly different from simply bringing up a conversation about sex.

I think you've picked the wrong hill to stand on here

 

[Confucamus]

If he called the book akin to "child pornography" then there is no way that the judge or mayor looked at the book. I've seen this series of books myself. It isn't some obscure, edgy book. It's pretty easy to see what happened if they were even vaguely aware of what the situation was. They're complaining about 3 or 4 inappropriate prompts in a book that has 642....and they're acting like the teachers ordered Playboy magazine for the class.
We're also talking about 17 year olds here, not 7 year olds, so the reaction to this is asinine.

At the end of the day, if some parents really have an issue with the book and want to change it, that's fine. But if we're being honest, we know that this isn't really about the book.
As evidenced in this thread, it's just people looking for the "Woke CRT liberal" boogieman.

I think parents fighting back against dangerous curriculum like CRT is a great thing. Parents should be fully aware of all that their kids are being taught. Also, you don't know that it's only 3 or 4 prompts that were inappropriate. In the news stories with video, more than 3 or 4 are given as an example by the parents. Ironically, I think the backlash against CRT and other harmful woke curriculum is exactly why you guys are brushing this off. That's disturbing.

 

[SmilinDesperado]

I think parents fighting back against dangerous curriculum like CRT is a great thing. Parents should be fully aware of all that their kids are being taught. Also, you don't know that it's only 3 or 4 prompts that were inappropriate. In the news stories with video, more than 3 or 4 are given as an example by the parents. Ironically, I think the backlash against CRT and other harmful woke curriculum is exactly why you guys are brushing this off. That's disturbing.

Look up the book yourself. It is not some new, edgy book that has some kind of political agenda. The point of the book is to give an array of topics and ideas for students to write about to challenge their creativity and force them to think about things they wouldn't normally think about. I don't have that particular book, but I own books like it.
To bring in this narrative about "the dangers of CRT" and pedophilia is absurd.

A parent has a right to know what their child is being taught---nobody is arguing against that. But if we're being honest, a book in an advanced class for 17 year olds that has words or sentences about sex is a big enough issue where the mayor and a judge need to get involved, and the book needs to be banned? Really? These are kids that are almost adults that are on their way to college..and the mere mention of sex and beer in a book is too far?


I am brushing this off because it isn't true. The same people that are bitching about the nothing that this story is, are the same people that bitch about CRT. The commonality is that they don't know anything about either topic, and are completely wrong on what is actually even being taught.
And then we get into these circular conversations about things that aren't even happening, as if teaching lessons on "hating white people and America" is in the curriculum.

 

[Confucamus]

Look up the book yourself. It is not some new, edgy book that has some kind of political agenda. The point of the book is to give an array of topics and ideas for students to write about to challenge their creativity and force them to think about things they wouldn't normally think about. I don't have that particular book, but I own books like it.
To bring in this narrative about "the dangers of CRT" and pedophilia is absurd.

A parent has a right to know what their child is being taught---nobody is arguing against that. But if we're being honest, a book in an advanced class for 17 year olds that has words or sentences about sex is a big enough issue where the mayor and a judge need to get involved, and the book needs to be banned? Really? These are kids that are almost adults that are on their way to college..and the mere mention of sex and beer in a book is too far?

Being prompted to write out a sex scene twice, one your mother would approve of and another she wouldn't, is equal to sex being merely mentioned? I'm not a prude at all guy, but stop that nonsense.

I am brushing this off because it isn't true. The same people that are bitching about the nothing that this story is, are the same people that bitch about CRT. The commonality is that they don't know anything about either topic, and are completely wrong on what is actually even being taught.
And then we get into these circular conversations about things that aren't even happening.

I mean, if your only rebuttal is claiming nobody else read either of those things then I got nothing for you. I, and plenty others, have read both. I don't think these prompts rise to the level of divisiveness and evil as CRT, but they are certainly strange and don't believe in a book of writing prompts for 16/17 year old kids. I'm glad parents are taking a closer look at their children's curriculum.