Social Ohio high school and sexual writing assignments

oh yeah how did it go again? Something along the lines of : “write a sex scene you wouldn’t show your mom” and to “rewrite the sex scene from above into one that you’d let your mom read.”
and then encouraging drinking..

Call me old fashioned but I don’t think any sane parent (I say sane because there are tons of misled and irresponsible people with children) would let their underaged kids be exposed to assignments as such and it does raise questions about the competence of anyone letting such material be available to kids. If it’s someone’s responsibility to evaluate what’s suitable for children one could expect them to be held accountable for failing to do so.

Is that sex-Ed to you? It’s a bit different to ask kids to expose their erotic fantasies than to tell kids how babies are made or how to use contraception, don’t you think?

I won’t go into intent of someone writing those assignments if the book was meant for adults : but I do have a problem with the incompetence of giving kids that material and saying that it’s no big deal.
Maybe not to you it’s not a problem but to me it is.

Are you going to have throw a bitch fit when I tell you 17 olds are given internet access to complete school work and the words sex and beer can found on there too? Gasp *clutches pearls*. What kind of monster gives access to something that could expose them to that!
 
This thread is full of adults who think it’s some big evil to give 17 year olds any media where the topics of sex and what beer taste like can be found.

so anyone who gives a 17 year old kid internet or television access has sexualized kids? Trying to keep up with this hyper-sensitive logic.
 
Being prompted to write out a sex scene twice, one your mother would approve of and another she wouldn't, is equal to sex being merely mentioned? I'm not a prude at all guy, but stop that nonsense.



1
.

They weren't prompted to do that.
If the teacher said "Hey guys, let's have a spicy class today. I want to hear about your best sex stories". THAT would be a problem, obviously. Who would disagree with that?
That is not what happened though. They were not given sex writing assignments.
A couple sex related prompts being in a book of 642 other prompts in a class for 17 year olds shouldn't be an issue to any rational adult.
It's like you guys have never been in a class room before. The teacher is not making them read or write on every single thing in the book. And again, the fact that they are 17 year olds in an advanced class prepping for college should also be a pretty decent clue that these aren't immature toddlers that needed to be shielded from the S word.

The only reason why there was outrage over this is because the parents and the mayor made it political and are trying to further this stupid argument on "libs/wokeness/CRT". No rational person could look at that book and think it required a mayor, a judge, allegations of child porn, and firing the staff.
You guys can't even be honest and admit that much.

I mean, if your only rebuttal is claiming nobody else read either of those things then I got nothing for you. I, and plenty others, have read both. I don't think these prompts rise to the level of divisiveness and evil as CRT, but they are certainly strange and don't believe in a book of writing prompts for 16/17 year old kids. I'm glad parents are taking a closer look at their children's curriculum.

Yeah, I've seen the arguments on CRT on this board, and no, most people in here have not actually read any books on the subject. They're parroting stuff they heard on the news. But that's besides the point.
The rebuttal isn't just on the merits and knowledge of what CRT is, or what's in the writing prompt book and its value----it's that what you guys are claiming is being taught, isn't even being taught. You are arguing things that aren't even happening.
 
This thread is full of adults who think it’s some big evil to give 17 year olds any media where the topics of sex and what beer taste like can be found.

so anyone who gives a 17 year old kid internet or television access has sexualized kids? Trying to keep up with this hyper-sensitive logic.

This thread has at least one guy I wouldn't let near my children unsupervised...
 
I believe the book is prompting them to write out a sex scene that they "wouldn't show their mom". This is alarming and certainly different from simply bringing up a conversation about sex.

I think you've picked the wrong hill to stand on here
Asking a highschool kid to describe a sex story is pretty fucked up.

Now I acknowledge there isn't any evidence of the sex stories being assigned. But maintain the book is a messed up thing to assign to children.
 
Last edited:
This thread has at least one guy I wouldn't let near my children unsupervised...

Right. At times I may be seen drinking a beer and god knows that exposure is highly offensive to wet paper bags like you.
 
This thread is full of adults who think it’s some big evil to give 17 year olds any media where the topics of sex and what beer taste like can be found.

so anyone who gives a 17 year old kid internet or television access has sexualized kids? Trying to keep up with this hyper-sensitive logic.
So why do you think an elected judge feels otherwise?
 
Didn't an Ohio university hold some sort of sex work seminar last year - with a lecture on making OnlyFans work?

Classy place.
 
Are you going to have throw a bitch fit when I tell you 17 olds are given internet access to complete school work and the words sex and beer can found on there too? Gasp *clutches pearls*. What kind of monster gives access to something that could expose them to that!
Is that something that the school should be exposing them to, by intent or negligence?
No, so why don’t you go back to your basement and work on your sarcasm.
 
Right. At times I may be seen drinking a beer and god knows that exposure is highly offensive to wet paper bags like you.

Nope I'm referring to how you think nothing of exposing inappropriate sexual topics to kids.

Nothing about drinking beer, fucking slimeball. What a disgusting deflection. It's OK most people can see through what you and other posters are saying.

Absolutely disgusting walking the pro pedo line like you do.
 
Those are some pretty good writing prompts. I'll take the Trannie and cucumber one. @Amerikuracana will take the nymphette one.
You aren’t going to believe this, but I’m actually finishing up a short story tonight that could fit (kind of) under that prompt. Maybe I’ll post it in the berry when I’m done and tag you.
 
Mayor of the town, after multiple students shared the assignments with their parents after it made them uncomfortable, is calling for their entire school board to resign and a judge called the assignments "essentially child pornography"

“It has come to my attention that your educators are distributing essentially what is child pornography in the classroom,” Hudson Mayor Craig Shubert told the Hudson Board of Education during a meeting Monday.

“I’ve spoken to a judge this evening. She’s already confirmed that. So I’m going to give you a simple choice: You either choose to resign from this board of education or you will be charged,” Shubert said before leaving the podium, receiving applause from the audience.

Shubert’s statement followed the revelation that high school students enrolled in the advanced course “Writing in the Liberal Arts II,” were issued a book called 642 Things to Write About, which featured some overtly sexual writing prompts designed for adolescents.

Among the ideas in the book were suggestions to “write a sex scene you wouldn’t show your mom” and to “rewrite the sex scene from above into one that you’d let your mom read.” Another prompt encouraged underage drinking, asking students to consume a beer and describe its taste, according to the Akron Beacon Journal.

Others asked the students to write out X-rated Disney scenes, a sermon for a preacher caught in a sex scandal, choosing how you would die, and what would be on your DVR if you were a serial killer.


None of the kids were asked to write about those things.
 
lol at the clowns defending this shit...

Why? Are you same shitheads like Prefect who defended the Pedo at the Wi Spa?

Looks like it...

  • Write an X-rated Disney scenario.

Honestly, there wasn't another reference book out there?

That said... Asking the board to resign seems a bit drastic and grandstanding by the mayor
 
What does the judge feel about this? Can you quote them?
Its in the OP:
“It has come to my attention that your educators are distributing essentially what is child pornography in the classroom,” Hudson Mayor Craig Shubert told the Hudson Board of Education during a meeting Monday.

I’ve spoken to a judge this evening. She’s already confirmed that.
 
Call me old fashioned but I don’t think any sane parent (I say sane because there are tons of misled and irresponsible people with children) would let their underaged kids be exposed to assignments as such and it does raise questions about the competence of anyone letting such material be available to kids..
The age of consent in Ohio is 16 years old…

The “kids” in question are older than that.

They are young adults, past the age of consent, who can already fuck legally whether their parents like it or not. They are old enough to drink in many countries. They’re going off to college next year. This “scandal” is laughable.

On the bright side it really helps me see who the morons are on here.
 
Last edited:
They weren't prompted to do that.
If the teacher said "Hey guys, let's have a spicy class today. I want to hear about your best sex stories". THAT would be a problem, obviously. Who would disagree with that?
That is not what happened though. They were not given sex writing assignments.
A couple sex related prompts being in a book of 642 other prompts in a class for 17 year olds shouldn't be an issue to any rational adult.

You claim nobody who has a problem with the prompts actually looked at the prompts. Did you? Because the example I listed, the one you're claiming they weren't prompted to do, was literally read out loud from the book by a parent at the board meeting. Did you even read or watch anything on this?


The only reason why there was outrage over this is because the parents and the mayor made it political and are trying to further this stupid argument on "libs/wokeness/CRT". No rational person could look at that book and think it required a mayor, a judge, allegations of child porn, and firing the staff.
You guys can't even be honest and admit that much.

Because libs/wokeness/CRT are neutrally political topics? C'mon now. It ain't the parents making it political in the first place.

Yeah, I've seen the arguments on CRT on this board, and no, most people in here have not actually read any books on the subject. They're parroting stuff they heard on the news. But that's besides the point.
The rebuttal isn't just on the merits and knowledge of what CRT is, or what's in the writing prompt book and its value----it's that what you guys are claiming is being taught, isn't even being taught. You are arguing things that aren't even happening.

Again with this stuff. "Defunding the police doesn't mean actually defunding the police!" You guys use that logic to defend the strangest things.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,234,829
Messages
55,310,658
Members
174,732
Latest member
herrsackbauer
Back
Top