• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Official War Room Awards 2017

Of course it’s true and this is just more lies from you. Funny you should bring up my Ron Paul support. Not only did misrepresent that position, but you had @dochter (who is dochter these days?) and @PolishHeadlock calling you out on it.

Huh? No idea what you're talking about, but are you now denying that you were a Ron Paul cheerleader?
 
He trolled me because he was losing his debate to Bald1 badly.

What the heck are you talking about?

Your theory is that I was "losing" to Bald1 (???) so I made you start acting hysterical and trying to derail the discussion?
 
And you bit. :(:D

I saw he posted in the Evergreen thread. Couldn't tell you what he said, but I'm guessing nothing resembles a concession.

LOL! You got too mad to continue because I pointed out that you got some facts wrong, and now you're just sniping like a little girl.
 
I'm somehow happy I dragged you into the mud here <{jackyeah}>

It's all good. I could have just said thank you and went on my way. But naaaaw man, I had to open my mouth! Lol
 
LOL! You got too mad to continue because I pointed out that you got some facts wrong, and now you're just sniping like a little girl.


lol at you repeating your own claims as if that's evidence. Let's bet. Put up or shut-up. I'll bet you can't show beyond a reasonable doubt that anger was expressed on my part.
 
lol at you repeating your own claims as if that's evidence. Let's bet. Put up or shut-up. I'll bet you can't show beyond a reasonable doubt that anger was expressed on my part.

LOL! Yeah, it's pixels on a screen. No way to prove that you're not just pretending to be a hostile idiot who is losing his shit because his narrative was upset by facts. But that's what you said.
 
So when jack gave that test of a term's meaning and you said "I could agree with that", you weren't actually agreeing?

My point was the term really doesn't have a clear definition to it which is actually the reason Jack's basis of whoever calls themselves it likely is that works. It furthers my point the term alt right doesnt' have a real backbone to it cause it's just an opt in or opt out term regardless of any actual beliefs/views. So yes, I agree with him on that part with the context that it shows how poor the term is, which I think we both came to agree on with him thinking the leftist, etc terms are even worse.

Or you didn't think it through to decide if the test had merit outside this one example?

I inferred you mentally applied it to other terms and was curious as to the answer to my initial question.

I originally applied it to the term "leftist" which I didn't get into a talk about the media about like I did with "alt right". I compared them as words that are being used to signal to a specific group off the bat a negative context to whatever person or group it gets applied to rather than going into a topic trying to make a determination for yourself who the person is aligning with on the specific topic. The issue we ran into was some actually do call themselves alt right which is something we tabled off in the comparison.

I don't think I still addressed what you are asking me. What is another example of what I should be addressing? The example of alt right was the negative aspect which gets applied to people who don't want it. I'm know there are articles/opinion shows that apply the term leftist to people/ groups who also would not agree with being that necessarily. Is that what you are asking?
 
I always point it out at the time. One I remember shaking my head about was when you kept insisting that the TPP was written by a certain number (you said the number) of lobbyists.


It's funny that even other ultra liberals like hate you.


So, why not just post a link now? Or, better yet, actually produce the quotes of him lying? You really should be willing to back up a claim of that nature.

and look whose here just a swingin' from Jack's bag!
 
LOL! Yeah, it's pixels on a screen. No way to prove that you're not just pretending to be a hostile idiot who is losing his shit because his narrative was upset by facts. But that's what you said.


Insisting on shit you have no evidence for is what you always criticize others for. Best poster was clearly just for 2017 I guess.


donald-trump-so-sad.jpg
 
I don't think I still addressed what you are asking me.

Correct. Thanks though for the recap. I was just interested to know if there were other labeling terms you felt were being misapplied.
 
Correct. Thanks though for the recap. I was just interested to know if there were other labeling terms you felt were being misapplied.

There are terms that a being used just to begin a story with a negative pretext to whoever is featured in it. Those terms to me are alt right and leftist. There are others I might not have off the top of my head but have the same element to them where you can go to the article and it felt like the entire purpose was just to say the person/groups name and that term before it cause nothing actually develops in the article thats really news worthy. I saw it happen a ton with alt right the past year. Leftist is a much older term that I see talk radio guys throw around a lot.
 
What the heck are you talking about?

Your theory is that I was "losing" to Bald1 (???) so I made you start acting hysterical and trying to derail the discussion?
Nice spin Jack. You brought me into this discussion. You detailed it. On purpose because you were losing.
 
Back
Top