Official War Room Awards 2017

You come off looking like complete shit in that thread though. There isn't a single example of @Jack V Savage lying. Not even one. Also, you got destroyed in the argument as well. Thanks for linking me though.

Do you get some sort of personal satisfaction out of being Jack's bitch?
 
You come off looking like complete shit in that thread though. There isn't a single example of @Jack V Savage lying. Not even one. Also, you got destroyed in the argument as well. Thanks for linking me though.
@Jack V Savage is a real villain to some people here. I remember being part of a private chat @pwent (rip bitch) started and there was a lot of complaining about him.

they absolutely hate him LOL
 
You come off looking like complete shit in that thread though. There isn't a single example of @Jack V Savage lying. Not even one. Also, you got destroyed in the argument as well. Thanks for linking me though.

Really. I come off as can molted shiy huh? Care to elaborate?
 
tenor.gif
 
Do you get some sort of personal satisfaction out of being Jack's bitch?
Jack gets attacked constantly, usually because they can't attack his posts, anyone who points this out gets called schoolyard names .

been going on for years lol
 
Jack gets attacked constantly, usually because they can't attack his posts, anyone who points this out gets called schoolyard names .

been going on for years lol
And a bunch of you just turn a blind eye or even jump in when he’s wrong, trolling, and or lying.
 
Really. I come off as can molted shiy huh? Care to elaborate?
Your argument was shit, you accused him of trolling in like your 2nd post in the thread, and generally acted like a little bitch the whole time. Maybe you should try making better arguments, and you won't come off looking like an impotent little bitch.
 
Your argument was shit, you accused him of trolling in like your 2nd post in the thread, and generally acted like a little bitch the whole time. Maybe you should try making better arguments, and you won't come off looking like an impotent little bitch.
Wow. Jack must fuck you real good.
 
Thread didnt get ugly until the damn awards were over
Ya'll asleep at the wheel this year
 
Your argument was shit, you accused him of trolling in like your 2nd post in the thread, and generally acted like a little bitch the whole time. Maybe you should try making better arguments, and you won't come off looking like an impotent little bitch.
At least you got through this post without posting a gif like the cunt bitch that you are.
 
There are terms that a being used just to begin a story with a negative pretext to whoever is featured in it. Those terms to me are alt right and leftist. There are others I might not have off the top of my head but have the same element to them where you can go to the article and it felt like the entire purpose was just to say the person/groups name and that term before it cause nothing actually develops in the article thats really news worthy. I saw it happen a ton with alt right the past year. Leftist is a much older term that I see talk radio guys throw around a lot.

Yep. People can be very misleading with word choice. As it pertains to the media, news sources should be certified in order to advertise as "news" and those reporting it should be licensed. Everyone else can say whatever the fuck they want. As it pertains to people, that's just something we need to work around. Otherwise we'd be Vulcans. And Star Trek showed why that's not much fun.

It's hard to separate the depth of meaning (connotation, emotional perspective, etc.) out of language such that everything can be stated in objectively neutral terms. I personally use the labels mostly just to move the general idea along and occasionally because I feel like getting a rise out of somebody. :cool:
 
Yep. People can be very misleading with word choice. As it pertains to the media, news sources should be certified in order to advertise as "news" and those reporting it should be licensed. Everyone else can say whatever the fuck they want. As it pertains to people, that's just something we need to work around. Otherwise we'd be Vulcans. And Star Trek showed why that's not much fun.

It's hard to separate the depth of meaning (connotation, emotional perspective, etc.) out of language such that everything can be stated in objectively neutral terms. I personally use the labels mostly just to move the general idea along and occasionally because I feel like getting a rise out of somebody. :cool:

I think a certification could just be a voluntary thing that would work if people generally respected whatever board controlled it and what their standards were. I don't see that ever working though because it would just be demonized by either side as biased which wouldn't held give any merit to having the certification. Those work better in fields with more objectivity but it's be interesting to see a country try it. It wouldn't want the certification to get any recognition from the state either.
 
Back
Top