• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Obama blames Founding Fathers

IH has said that he's a transsexual, and hormone therapy from that does have those kinds of effects.

Interesting... while you are digging yourself deeper, where have I said I was transsexual anywhere on this site at anytime? :D
 
hillarious thread, especially the last couple of pages. This forum never lets you down.
 
Why are you calling people transsexuals? Stay classy.

Huh? IH has said that he's a transsexual, and hormone therapy from that does have those kinds of effects. I guess you think I'm just saying that, but he's been open about it.
 
Interesting... while you are digging yourself deeper, where have I said I was transsexual anywhere on this site at anytime? :D

So you're now saying you're not a transsexual? I'm pretty sure you've said it before, but if you were joking or something, I guess I didn't realize that.
 
So you're now saying you're not a transsexual? I'm pretty sure you've said it before, but if you were joking or something, I guess I didn't realize that.

c'mon, we need a link to 'it' confessing that 'it' is a transsexual.
 
So you're now saying you're not a transsexual? I'm pretty sure you've said it before, but if you were joking or something, I guess I didn't realize that.

No, I did not say that I was a transsexual, and yes you missed that one.
 
c'mon, we need a link to 'it' confessing that 'it' is a transsexual.

I'll look for what I'm talking about, but it's not just one post. If he's not too offended, I'm pretty sure IH knows what I'm talking about and can clear up the confusion.

Ed: Still looking for what I'm talking about, but in the mean time, I found this:

I'm not gay just a champion of sexual freedom, sexual expression, and for looking damn androgynously fine in men or women's clothes, good time to remention the not gay part.

No, I did not say that I was a transsexual, and yes you missed that one.

OK. Sorry. I really thought you said that. Is it just transvestite, then? I'm not making this up, though I may have gotten confused somewhere.
 
Huh? IH has said that he's a transsexual, and hormone therapy from that does have those kinds of effects. I guess you think I'm just saying that, but he's been open about it.

Let's say s/he/it was/were a tranny. Why would ridicule of someone's gender and biological state not be hateful? Life is hard enough for thos trapped in a body their mind does not identify with. Denigrating those folks is low just because they do not have professional identity warriors in their corner. Shame.

What if Internethero was a black female, would you insinuate her hormones were prone to make her predisposed to emotionalism more so than average? If no why not? If so wouldn't that be sexist/racist? I understand republicans being hateful and insensitive, it's in their genes. But I thought democrats were a tad more noble.
 
Let's say s/he/it was/were a tranny. Why would ridicule of someone's gender and biological state not be hateful?

Ridicule, sure. Saying that the process could be responsible for unusual behavior, no.
 
OK. Sorry. I really thought you said that. Is it just transvestite, then? I'm not making this up, though I may have gotten confused somewhere.

Yes, and a straight transvestite allegedly!

I am not offended, but thanks all the same for the honest apology.
 
So... you are stating that biological conditions influence behavior... Fascinating

Never denied it. Just think that your crude racism is wrong.

Yes, and a straight transvestite allegedly!

I am not offended, but thanks all the same for the honest apology.

Absolutely. I was digging at your behavior, but I would never dig at someone's identity.
 
LOL so IH is straight but just likes to wear women's clothes on occasion?

OK then, glad we cleared that one up.
 
It is true that the Constitution limits any current government's ability to implement change management strategies designed to encourage financial and social progression. On the other hand, these checks and balances do protect us from fringe elements that may not have the collective society's best interests in mind.

Huh? IH has said that he's a transsexual, and hormone therapy from that does have those kinds of effects. I guess you think I'm just saying that, but he's been open about it.

No, I did not say that I was a transsexual, and yes you missed that one.


Jack's once granite muse pulpit has warped into a fragile deck of cards, swaying with the murky winds. Unburden yourself from fret and slight over trivial exchange, lest be cast down, back under the mildewed bridge of discord.
 
Jack's once granite muse pulpit has warped into a fragile deck of cards, swaying with the murky winds. Unburden yourself from fret and slight over trivial exchange, lest be cast down, back under the mildewed bridge of discord.

Goosebumps, man.

 
Never denied it. Just think that your crude racism is wrong.



Absolutely. I was digging at your behavior, but I would never dig at someone's identity.

Don't try to deflect or rationalize your bigoted speech. I haven't said anything racist or sexist, yet you have a history of slurs directed towards mentally handicapped, gender confused, and others. Why does your heart hold such hate?

Let me share some advice jack, treat others the way you'd be treated. I would say that it's funny that the left violates standards of decent speech but the left doesn't really have standards.
 
Don't try to deflect or rationalize your bigoted speech. I haven't said anything racist or sexist, yet you have a history of slurs directed towards mentally handicapped, gender confused, and others. Why does your heart hold such hate?

Let me share some advice jack, treat others the way you'd be treated. I would say that it's funny that the left violates standards of decent speech ut the left doesn't really have standards.

IH obviously is not "confused" about his gender. Seems like more of a style choice than anything.
 
In his own words:
_____________________________________________________________________

“We still suffer from not having a Constitution that guarantees its citizens economic rights.” By positive economic rights, Obama means government protection against individual economic failures, such as low incomes, unemployment, poverty, lack of health care, and the like. Obama characterizes the Constitution as “a charter of negative liberties,” which “says what the states can’t do to you (and) what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf.”

what does that have to do with gridlock? My question was what would he have done, meaning to avoid these so called "limitations" that cause him problems in pushing his agenda?

he would have to expand on this concept of economic rights, but on it's face it sounds like a utopian platitude.
 
Last edited:
what does that have to do with gridlock? My question was what would he have done, meaning to avoid these so called "limitations" that cause him problems in pushing his agenda?

he would have to expand on this concept of economic rights, but on it's face it sounds like a utopian platitude.

I misunderstood your question, the states delegates made that decision, when you said founding fathers I assumed you were talking about the constitution.

here's his explanation of economic rights

http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulrod...ng-been-on-record-in-favor-of-redistribution/
 
Last edited:
Back
Top