Based on what he's saying, the demographic of the neighborhood isn't the reason for the tax. The reason is that there is a tax imbalance and that happens to be the demographic of the neighborhoods where this imbalance occurs.
It'd be like saying "place more police in poorer, crime heavy, minority neighborhoods" the demographic happens to be minority but the reason is the crime.
So, not illegal, just very poorly worded.
...you are aware that all politicians do this yes?The fuck...
Its just pandering for votes. Performative speech for the lowest common denominator
Seems like thats what he is suggesting.And how would you do it? Raise property tax percentages based on what? Location?
LolRace?
That'd be dumb for sure.Or higher sales tax based on location? lol
ProbablyIt's just a stupid dog whistle to the far left base
"Tax the Rich"
Final debate.
I forgot about the guardian angel guy lol and
My favorite part about election season is when one of these fringe weirdos manages to survive this long and then has to be taken seriously in debates and the like.lol, he was on that breakfast club podcast either yesterday or today, with Charlemagne the hod or whatever his name is.
Like why bother, he is polling less than even Adams, who dropped out of the race
My favorite part about election season is when one of these fringe weirdos manages to survive this long and then has to be taken seriously in debates and the like.
So far it looks like Mamdani is debating better. Cuomo has got some good jabs but he is sounding frantic and emotional.
My favorite part about election season is when one of these fringe weirdos manages to survive this long and then has to be taken seriously in debates and the like.
So far it looks like Mamdani is debating better. Cuomo has got some good jabs but he is sounding frantic and emotional.