Social Not so free to speak: Columbia University ‘refusing to help’ identify people for arrest – White House

[oldshadow]

So you are fine with any green card holders for no other reason than “I don’t like them”?

That’s a great standard you have lol

When they support terrorism and hate America, yea I'm fine with kicking them out.

 

[tastaylvr]

When they support terrorism and hate America, yea I'm fine with kicking them out.

That’s not what you said lol

Not surprised you keep changing your standard every post

Must be easy going through life without any standards at all

 

[oldshadow]

That’s not what you said lol

Not surprised you keep changing your standard every post

Must be easy going through life without any standards at all

That's what I have been saying all along. But you don't see a problem with support hamas and their actions.

 

[deviake]

Daily reminder that Israel is an apartheid state and the IDF is a terrorist organization.

Just in case anyone forgot.

 

[tastaylvr]

That's what I have been saying all along. But you don't see a problem with support hamas and their actions.

I see a problem with a lot of things but that isn’t the discussion here lol

You seem to be out of your depth in most discussions and should stick to reading instead of posting tbh

Never seen someone flip flop so much and have zero consistency in his views

There are a lot of people who support a lot of “problematic” views in America but apparently the land of the free can start detaining and getting rid of people for supporting views you don’t like even though there isn’t any evidence to show that?

 

[oldshadow]

I see a problem with a lot of things but that isn’t the discussion here lol

You seem to be out of your depth in most discussions and should stick to reading instead of posting tbh

Never seen someone flip flop so much and have zero consistency in his views

There are a lot of people who support a lot of “problematic” views in America but apparently the land of the free can start detaining and getting rid of people for supporting views you don’t like even though there isn’t any evidence to show that?

Like I said with my first post and the last one. He is a guest in this country if thy can show where he did what he is accused of then kick him out.

This upsets you because I guess you agree with his views.

You are the one out of your depth is you don't understand this simple concept.

Are you even a US citizen.

 

[evergreenrider]

Like I said with my first post and the last one. He is a guest in this country if thy can show where he did what he is accused of then kick him out.

This upsets you because I guess you agree with his views.

You are the one out of your depth is you don't understand this simple concept.

Are you even a US citizen.

You don't know what he did. You are blindly accepting that some vague, unspecified transgressions were committed because the federal government says so. The always truthful, never deceiving federal goverment.

 

[Islam Imamate]

Zionism is the greatest threat to the country, period.

Idk that I'd go that far but its definitely the foremost threat to speech rights. The anti-BDS laws were bad enough but now we're seeing open retaliation by the government for wrongthink on this issue and at least half of conservatives along with a sizeable minority of the Dems are either cheering it on or looking the other way.

 

[Islam Imamate]

He was (according to the state department) posting support for hamas

Posting support for Hamas? In other words, protected speech?

and a leader in the group/organization threatening and intimidating Jewish students.

We will see what happens.

That would be a crime, if he did that why isn't he being charged? Its because the state knows this wouldn't hold up in court.

 

[Ares Black]

You're just repeating yourself and not answering the question. What did he actually say? Verbally or written.

You're getting yourself into a tizzy here. What did he say that upset you so much? Surely you can point me to a quote or detailed description of his speech.

Do you even understand what constitutes imminent lawless action?

You are not talking to a rational person

 

[Islam Imamate]

You are not talking to a rational person

Nor an honest one either.

 

[Seano]

I seem to recall a lot of people on the left saying free speech didn't mean free from consequence. What's changed?

 

[Islam Imamate]

I seem to recall a lot of people on the left saying free speech didn't mean free from consequence. What's changed?

That was in reference to consequences from private actors like being fired by your private employer or banned from a private establishment or platform.

The 1st amendment is explicitly there to protect us from state sanctioned consequences for protected speech, how do you not get that?

 

[Ares Black]

I seem to recall a lot of people on the left saying free speech didn't mean free from consequence. What's changed?

I guess you don't understand what free speech means

 

[oldshadow]

You don't know what he did. You are blindly accepting that some vague, unspecified transgressions were committed because the federal government says so. The always truthful, never deceiving federal goverment.

Go back and read my post if the state department can show he did any of this to the review then out he goes to never come back.

 

[Ares Black]

Go back and read my post if the state department can show he did any of this to the review then out he goes to never come back.

Your willingness to look the other way is cowardly. You are totally fine with the government detaining someone without any charges.

 

[oldshadow]

Posting support for Hamas? In other words, protected speech?

That would be a crime, if he did that why isn't he being charged? Its because the state knows this wouldn't hold up in court.

He doesn't need to be charge with a crime to have have green card revolked. Support for al terrorist group is not a crime but a guest in this country can get kick out or not let in for it, as it should be.

If it gets to the Supreme Court and it probably will we will see what they say.

 

[oldshadow]

Your willingness to look the other way is cowardly. You are totally fine with the government detaining someone without any charges.

If they are a guest in this country they don't have to be chargedwith a crime to get kick out. They are kicking out gang members as they should. The only reason you don't like it is because Republicans are in power but when Obama was doing it not a word from the demorats.

 

[tastaylvr]

He doesn't need to be charge with a crime to have have green card revolked. Support for a verbal terrorist group is not a crime but a guest in this country can get kick out or not let in for it, as it should be.

If it gets to the Supreme Court and it probably will we will see what they say.

If they are a guest in this country they don't have to be chargedwith a crime to get kick out. They are kicking out gang members as they should. The only reason you don't like it is because Republicans are in power but when Obama was doing it not a word from the demorats.

Is English your first language?

This is embarrassing

 

[Ares Black]

If they are a guest in this country they don't have to be chargedwith a crime to get kick out. They are kicking out gang members as they should. The only reason you don't like it is because Republicans are in power but when Obama was doing it not a word from the demorats.

What absolute nonsense.