Law No more nationwide injunctions from district judges

[Sinister]

What?

Slaves were citizens?

Of course its been questioned and can be. I actually think its a good idea to settle it with the Supreme Court.

You still cannot deported US citizens and that includes minors. The government is not deporting US minors its the parents that are deporting them.

The democrats are just mad the anchor baby shit is being fixed as it should be.

No the parents are not deporting their own children. Jesus f*ckin Christ.

And what a Cop who threatens a prostitute to let him f*ck or he sends her to prison, if she agrees that's not grape? She chose it? Lol

 

[Rob Battisti]

Intelligent as judged by what exactly? All 3 got unanimous ratings of Well Qualified by the ABA, which is a higher rating than Thomas got.

Their continued irrational statements along with high degrees of hypocritical rulings.

 

[oldshadow]

its majority Trump's first term, and you know that. Obama's deportations are well-documented as NOT having these kinds of "mistakes."

The parents arent being explained any rights, they're being threatened. Disingenuous arguments are disingenuous. They're not being explained to that it's their right to take their child, they are being told they can either take their child or leave their child with ICE, and not being given the ability to speak with Family or attorneys, that's not what I call enforcement of rights. That's statist terrorism, being applauded by people who lost their minds at the mere suggestion that they wear a mask in public

They are told they have the choice of taking their child or not.

You are just made the anchor baby is no longer an anchor for illegals. They came or stayed illegally so the situation is their fault.

 

[Rob Battisti]

Next time highlight the "on average" portion of my statement and apply the knowledge I know you have. The Democrats are NOT the party of the most wealthy being as they're not the party of tax cuts and de-regulation to the same degree Republicans are.

In the 2024 U.S. presidential election, higher-income voters generally favored the Democratic Party candidate, Kamala Harris, over the Republican Party candidate, Donald Trump. According to exit poll data:


• Voters with household incomes over $100,000 preferred Harris by a margin of 54% to 45% for Trump. This represents a shift from 2020, when Trump won this group 54% to 42%.


• Specifically, for voters with incomes between $100,000 and $199,999, 51% voted for Harris, while 46% voted for Trump.


• For those with incomes over $200,000, Harris led with 53% compared to Trump’s 45%.


This indicates that the Democratic Party had a slight edge among higher-income voters in 2024, particularly those in the upper income brackets, marking a notable realignment from previous elections where affluent voters leaned more Republican.

In the 2024 U.S. presidential election, Kamala Harris had more individual billionaires donate to her campaign than Donald Trump. According to Forbes, 83 billionaires supported Harris, while 52 backed Trump.

 

[oldshadow]

No the parents are not deporting their own children. Jesus f*ckin Christ.

They choose if the child stays or goes with them. So yes they are deporting their children.

 

[avenue94]

I stand by my opinion that those three are significantly less intelligent than other judges past or present irrespective of political leanings.

So who are your 10 most intelligent judges in Supreme Court history?

And I love the enlightened centrist sham of "oh these are the dumbest judges in court history based off of verbal gaffes or errors."

 

[HockeyBjj]

No he is not. Show me where this is happening, its not. He is giving parents the right to take their child with them. That is not going to change even if the Supreme Court rules against Trump.

There is nothing stopping him from deporting a born here to a pair of illegal immigrants 18+ old saying they're not an American citizen

We can bump this post when it happens. Probably will find a lowest of the low murderer or rapist for the test case, but without the nationwide injunction trump is now allowed to deport American citizens claiming the 14th amendment means whatever he and the justice department want it to mean. Can't be stopped by a court anymore until the original case is resolved.

 

[Mr Holmes]

This is the context that the left intentionally likes to leave out when crying "They're deporting U.S. citizens! Babies even!!" The parents chose to take the kids. Is the left now mad that families are NOT being separated?

If they let the child stay their talking point would be: "They're kidnapping children!!"

 

[Rob Battisti]

So who are your 10 most intelligent judges in Supreme Court history?

And I love the enlightened centrist sham of "oh these are the dumbest judges in court history based off of verbal gaffes or errors."

It’s an opinion based on what I am able to gather from the public information on their rulings. It’s okay to disagree.

 

[Mr Holmes]

There is nothing stopping him from deporting a born here to a pair of illegal immigrants 18+ old saying they're not an American citizen

We can bump this post when it happens. Probably will find a lowest of the low murderer or rapist for the test case, but without the nationwide injunction trump is now allowed to deport American citizens claiming the 14th amendment means whatever he and the justice department want it to mean. Can't be stopped by a court anymore until the original case is resolved.

Actually there is. When you're born here you have a birth certificate that says you're an American citizen.

 

[Deorum]

So who are your 10 most intelligent judges in Supreme Court history?

And I love the enlightened centrist sham of "oh these are the dumbest judges in court history based off of verbal gaffes or errors."

He's got RBT at #1.

 

[avenue94]

Their continued irrational statements along with high degrees of hypocritical rulings.

Again, what ruling have they issued that was as hypocritical and nakedly tortured as Thomas' opinion for Dobbs? Are you disputing that his opinion in Dobbs was particularly egregious, no matter what angle you approach it from?

That's not even mentioning the multiple Supreme Court decisions conservatives applaud that are bad to the core because they are sanctuaries of their own logic and not meant to apply as precedent.

It’s an opinion based on what I am able to gather from the public information on their rulings. It’s okay to disagree.

So you're convinced that these 3 are less intelligent than average, but you can't even name who are the 10 most intelligent justices throughout history, presumably because you can't even name 10 justices from pre-1900.

Is that an accurate summation of how you arrived at your opinion?

 

[avenue94]

He's got RBT at #1.

I can't wait to hear from edgy libertarians how Taney was a GOAT tier justice and exemplar example of American legalism.

 

[SKYNET]

Next time highlight the "on average" portion of my statement and apply the knowledge I know you have. The Democrats are NOT the party of the most wealthy being as they're not the party of tax cuts and de-regulation to the same degree Republicans are.

I understood the part that said "on average" , But the right wing propaganda Forbes outlet showed Harris having "much more" than Trump so not sure where in the country the R's are getting "much more" than the D's?

I thought it was a fair question regardless.

Was hoping you could substantiate, possibly quantify your claim.

 

[HockeyBjj]

Actually there is. When you're born here you have a birth certificate that says you're an American citizen.

And that is literally what trump is arguing against with the birthright citizenship case

Trump argues that to be citizens they have to have at least 1 citizen parent even if they're born here.

 

[BFoe]

Their continued irrational statements along with high degrees of hypocritical rulings.

That’s a pretty vague non-answer. Want me to list all the irrational statements and hypocritical rulings the others have made? We’d be here for quite awhile.

The conservatives bloc of the Roberts Court has no issue upending whatever precedents they choose, or even contradicting themselves at times.

It’s an opinion based on what I am able to gather from the public information on their rulings. It’s okay to disagree.

That’s fine too, we’ll leave it at that.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

@Rob Battisti

I guess I can’t quote your quote of the article. The problem is he interjects his opinion to discredit the actual fact, his opinion that the tax cuts only benefit the billionaires class.

However, the data shows the Trump tax cuts helped the middle class the most.

IRS data proves Trump tax cuts benefited middle, working-class Americans most

Republicans’ 2017 tax reform law did exactly what was promised: It lowered taxes for all income groups.

thehill.com

Not to mention the new tax cuts Trump is trying to add.

A lot of typical Republican donors want open borders for cheap labor to drive down wages as well. That is why they tried to pass that “bipartisan” border bill that basically legalized 2 million a year.

 

[Deleted member 592570]

Look for Trump to be basically unstoppable now that he's shored up support from the deep state and power lobbies over the past month.

 

[Deleted member 592570]

It's alarming she got nominated and confirmed. She is dangerously stupid and needs to be impeached.

That's the lady that doesn't know what a woman is, right?

 

[Deleted member 592570]

Someone needs to write a script that turns @Sinister's laugh emojis to crying emojis to more accurately reflect reality