Law No more nationwide injunctions from district judges

[Rod1]

Im just baffled bynthe decision because there's really nothing they can do to mitigate Trump, or anyone to come after him, from just overwhelming them with EOs

How is it baffling? activist judge going to activist judge.

 

[Crazy Source]

Ah yes the third world educated man nihilism, welcome to our life, at some point you decide to ignore politics and stop talking about politics with your friends, otherwise its losing your sanity.

I hope I'm not that cookie-cutter, but I guess I'm not special.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

The God-Emperor just can't stop Winning!

- Made Iran tap to strikes.

- Showed Israel who really holds the power by not allowing them to kill the Iranian Supreme Leader.

- Had so many European leaders calling him, "Daddy", that NATO now stands for North Atlantic TRUMP Organisation.

- Supreme Court just told district court judges to stay in their fucking lane.

At this rate, Aliens will invade the earth on July 4th...and immediately surrender to Trump.

Plus YoungHoon Kim is calling him the smartest president ever, at least 200 IQ

 

[Rob Battisti]

He is speaking of arcs of governments. Some take the position that the U.S. is on a steady decline and we already peaked. I tend to agree. Post WWII was our peak, then corporations started being able to legislate. I blame the boomers. They sopped up the gravy and pissed on those that followed.

Oh we’re 100% on the decline. Once faith in institutions is gone, populism comes next — then authoritarianism.

We’re 100% going down.

 

[Rob Battisti]

I hope I'm not that cookie-cutter, but I guess I'm not special.

I never talk politics with anyone except the retards here

 

[AWilder]

They are granting the President this power while putting themselves above the president, but the power of the SCOTUS relies on the institutional nature of the US government, which they are eroding.

My guess is that they think in the event of a pendulum swing they will just rein the president back in, which is most likely to happen.

The issue with all of this is that someone like Trump is always going to want more and more power and if the SCOTUS eventually gets to a point where they say "Trump may be an issue here" the institutionality of the US government could be so eroded that Trump could ignore the SCOTUS.

This again, is unlikely to happen as these processes take years, Erdorgan, Putin, Chavez they all had plenty of time to do it since they were relatively young when they took power, Trump is old and so far there doesn't seems to be a heir in line that has the same pull as him, so quite likely it dies with him even though the damage will last for a while it can be reversed if people manage to vote normal people back in.

They want to try and do at a federal level what NC does with governors. The highly right wing gerrymandered state has a defacto right wing hold on state congressional power that then gives or takes away power depending on if the governor is Democrat or Republican.

 

[Crazy Source]

Oh we’re 100% on the decline. Once faith in institutions is gone, populism comes next — then authoritarianism.

We’re 100% going down.

You generally take a rightist position, and this decline into authoritarianism is being fed by the right like limbs into a wood chipper.

 

[PEB]

 

[Crazy Source]

I never talk politics with anyone except the retards here

My closest friends are conservative people. We don't get too deep into it, but we do understand that beliefs are a fucking ridiculous thing to let divide us. Like cavemen disagreeing on the way to wipe their asses.

 

[KnightTemplar]

View attachment 1101595

Democracy is a cancer. Fascism is the chemotherapy.

 

[Rob Battisti]

You generally take a rightist position, and this decline into authoritarianism is being fed by the right like limbs into a wood chipper.

I don’t necessarily take a rightist positions I just dislike the cultural positions of the left tbh

 

[Crazy Source]

I don’t necessarily take a rightist positions I just dislike the cultural positions of the left tbh

That's fair, and it sucks that the cultural positions distract from what is a better platform for the average Joe.

 

[GreatSaintGuillotine]

How is it baffling? activist judge going to activist judge.

I know. I occasionally make the mistake of expecting competency from our leadership. Very dumb mistake

 

[oldshadow]

If you have to defend your rights from government with violence then government already failed.


How is giving the president the ability to literally carry out EOs with zero recourse considered "freedom"


But that's exactly what's happening, this isn't about the Constitutionality of some laws which at least need to be consented by the People (represented by Congress and Senate as per the Constitution), this is about the Constitutionally of fucking EOs, something the president can fire at will on a whim.

A president can create 1,000 EOs in a day and the notion that all of them need to reach the SCOTUS before a limit has to be placed on the president is ridiculou.

Im sure you as an American have been said that you guys are EXCEPTIONAL that you somehow are immune to what the rest of the world has threaded, but take it from someone that lives in a shithole flawed democracy, this path isn't new it has been threated over and over through history and it always end up in the same place.

Anything is possible but the cure is not to give local judges power over the entire nation. That goes directly against the 10th amendment and is an large over reach. If congress wants they can make laws to limit the president's executive orders. The Supreme Court can hold an emergency session anytime. So any person including a congress person can file to stop any actions by the president.

 

[Crazy Source]

Anything is possible but the cure is not to give local judges power over the entire nation. That goes directly against the 10th amendment and is an large over reach. If congress wants they can make laws to limit the president's executive orders. The Supreme Court can hold an emergency session anytime. So any person including a congress person can file to stop any actions by the president.

The problem is that the executive branch can continue breaking laws until it reaches the SCOTUS. I may be wrong on that, but cases have to work their way up, right? This doesn't help the people that are being wronged. Do you not see that slowing this process down is the proper path? If this administration has such firm legal ground to do what it is doing, why rush processes forward without judicial oversight?

 

[Rob Battisti]

That's fair, and it sucks that the cultural positions distract from what is a better platform for the average Joe.

I don’t think any platform cares about the average joe. I don’t see myself voting for either major party in the foreseeable future.

 

[Crazy Source]

I don’t think any platform cares about the average joe. I don’t see myself voting for either major party in the foreseeable future.

Worker's rights. A fairer taxation. A more focused effort on preserving our lands. @Deorum A pushback on corporate interests. That last one needs to be cleaned up on both sides. However, it was the right that got Citizen's United past the SCOTUS. I just don't see it, Rob. I appreciate your honest discussion with me. I'd share a beer anytime.

 

[chardog]

No more running across the border and shitting out an EBT recipient. Seriously....Why would anyone be mad about that?

Leftists don’t even want to penalize employers that are hiring illegals anymore, they’re heroes



I use to remember these employers were the ultimate bad guys….. now they are heroic

 

[Stoic1]

I never talk politics with anyone except the retards here

Bro, you can save a TON on Christmas gifts by talking politics with family.

 

[oldshadow]

The problem is that the executive branch can continue breaking laws until it reaches the SCOTUS. I may be wrong on that, but cases have to work their way up, right? This doesn't help the people that are being wronged. Do you not see that slowing this process down is the proper path? If this administration has such firm legal ground to do what it is doing, why rush processes forward without judicial oversight?

The judge can stop it in the area he oversees but not for the entire nation. That's all this ruling does.

A judge that's district is in new York can't issue an order for New Mexico. They can only issue an order for his district.