Law Mysterious Glitch causes sections of the Constitution to Vanish

[nhbbear]

Yeah, maybe that’s what happened with “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”

 

[Sinister]

Yeah, maybe that’s what happened with “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”

Nope, it happened with "a well-organized Militia."

 

[Snubnoze707]

Obama already got rid of Habeas Corpus a looooong time ago....

President Obama Signs Indefinite Detention Bill Into Law​

December 31, 2011 4:26 pm

President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law today. The statute contains a sweeping worldwide indefinite detention provision. While President Obama issued a signing statement saying he had “serious reservations” about the provisions, the statement only applies to how his administration would use the authorities granted by the NDAA, and would not affect how the law is interpreted by subsequent administrations.

President Obama Signs Indefinite Detention Bill Into Law | American Civil Liberties Union

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE...

www.aclu.org

 

[nhbbear]

Nope, it happened with "a well-organized Militia."

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

That does not mean that it only allows for the people to have firearms if they are part of a militia. It means that people are to have th right to keep and bear arms in the event that they are needed for a militia to fight against the government or other invaders. That includes the right to self defense

 

[oldshadow]

If you talk to Cops when they ask you questions, and believe you should willingly let them search your vehicle because you "have nothing to hide" then you're already sacrificing two key rights to being an informed citizen

Yes i think your actual rights should be taught in high school.

I plenty of people that scream " I know my right" when they have no idea what they are talking about.

 

[AmonTobin]

BigBallz right now:

 

[Sinister]

Yes i think your actual rights should be taught in high school.

I plenty of people that scream " I know my right" when they have no idea what they are talking about.

No you don't. You just dont want to admit that you're compliant in the face of actual tyranny because you think you're part of the "in group." People like you thought you were Constitutional vigilantes during Covid because disobeying mask policies in private businesses. Which is comical because most of you work in places with dress codes. If you had any REAL idea what a contentious relationship with your Government was like, youd understand your constitutional rights and how to use them, and every Federal agent who blatantly violated those rights would not only have to go through this:



But they'd be sued into oblivion for each violation primarily of the 4th amendment. And the lawsuit wouldn't be paid out from tax dollars, but from pensions or private insurance the agents had to pay for themselves.

 

[Sinister]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

That does not mean that it only allows for the people to have firearms if they are part of a militia. It means that people are to have th right to keep and bear arms in the event that they are needed for a militia to fight against the government or other invaders. That includes the right to self defense

Uh no, that's not what a well-regulated Militia means. Fight against the Government LOL. You really think the Constition enables sedition.

Check out if the Constituton itself denotes what a well-regulated Militia is and who regulates it. I'll give you a hint, as a Militiaman you'd be called on to fight FOR the Government, not against it.

And no, it did not include the right to self defense per se, plenty of cities and towns during the early days of the US didnt permit the carrying of firearms for self-defense purposes.

 

[nhbbear]

Uh no, that's not what a well-regulated Militia means. Fight against the Government LOL. You really think the Constition enables sedition.

Check out if the Constituton itself denotes what a well-regulated Militia is and who regulates it. I'll give you a hint, as a Militiaman you'd be called on to fight FOR the Government, not against it.

And no, it did not include the right to self defense per se, plenty of cities and towns during the early days of the US didnt permit the carrying of firearms for self-defense purposes.

Regardless of what you say, shall not be infringed has been interpreted by the SCOTUS and it absolutely gives me or any non felon/domestic abused the right to carry a firearm for self defense, or simply because I want to as my second amendment right.

 

[oldshadow]

No you don't. You just dont want to admit that you're compliant in the face of actual tyranny because you think you're part of the "in group." People like you thought you were Constitutional vigilantes during Covid because disobeying mask policies in private businesses. Which is comical because most of you work in places with dress codes. If you had any REAL idea what a contentious relationship with your Government was like, youd understand your constitutional rights and how to use them, and every Federal agent who blatantly violated those rights would not only have to go through this:



But they'd be sued into oblivion for each violation primarily of the 4th amendment. And the lawsuit wouldn't be paid out from tax dollars, but from pensions or private insurance the agents had to pay for themselves.

As usual you are full of shit and have no idea what you are talking about. I wore a mask when any business required it because I know their right to set entrance requirements and where I worked required it.

Im going to say I have a better understanding of what rights are then you.

The cop did nothing leagaly wrong in you video and neither did the guy. He was being a bit of an ass from the start but he has that right.

 

[oldshadow]

Uh no, that's not what a well-regulated Militia means. Fight against the Government LOL. You really think the Constition enables sedition.

Check out if the Constituton itself denotes what a well-regulated Militia is and who regulates it. I'll give you a hint, as a Militiaman you'd be called on to fight FOR the Government, not against it.

And no, it did not include the right to self defense per se, plenty of cities and towns during the early days of the US didnt permit the carrying of firearms for self-defense purposes.

Well regulated means well trained but the states have failed at that as there should be free training for its people including the unorganized militia.

Because certain place has unconstitutional laws didn't make it right. Se slavery as another example.

 

[ermac88]

I thought the US Constitution was bulletproof.





A technical error on a government website briefly removed key sections of the U.S. Constitution, including the clause that guarantees the right to challenge unlawful detention.

Those sections outline congressional powers and limits, with Section 9 specifically stating, “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”
The change was noticed by online users and confirmed through the Wayback Machine, which showed the full text present on July 17 but missing in more recent snapshots.

Officials in Trump’s government were quietly telling staff that the deletions were the result of a technical “glitch,” sources familiar with the matter say. As a result, personnel scrambled to fix the issue, figure out how exactly it happened, and also review other parts of the website to see if there were any other conspicuous deletions.

Some federal staffers raised their eyebrows at the blame-a-glitch explanation, given the apparently coincidental nature of the deletions affecting sections of the Constitution that the second Trump administration is openly working so hard to shred. “Funny coincidence,” one federal employee said who was dealing with this situation.

Govt. Website 'Glitch' Removes Trump's Least Favorite Part of Constitution

Trump is trying to take over the Library of Congress, but its website already deleted a part of the Constitution that Trump officials don’t like.

www.rollingstone.com

I wonder if its the same "glitch" that removed certain "DEI" members from US history?

I guess its better than Don doing with crayons on top of the actual constitutions

 

[Crazy Source]

I wonder if its the same "glitch" that removed certain "DEI" members from US history?

I guess its better than Don doing with crayons on top of the actual constitutions

That "glitch" also removed all evidence of Trump's impeachments at the Smithsonian. History will not be kind to Trump or those that have surrounded him. Then his supporters, 20 years down the road, will pull an "Iraq war" on us and claim they never supported him.