- Joined
- Jul 8, 2021
- Messages
- 31,979
- Reaction score
- 67,275
That's a shocking article lol
Despite the risk that any delay could result in yet more questions being asked, the charging decision is said to have been put off following significant concerns among ministers and the CPS that the announcement could prompt public disorder.
What does that even mean? There doesn't seem to be a single quote anywhere in that piece.
It's not outside the realms of possibility that there are security concerns, but those would still exist in two weeks' time - with even more focus.
Doesn't seem to make any sense.
Just get on with the trial and let the pieces fall where they may, whatever the truth is will come out in the end and people can admit if they were right or wrong all along. But yeah. Dogshit piece of journalism. Not having a go at you, literally that article isn't worth of being printed on a Dude Wipe.