Among others yes.
When someone holds a legal belief that isn't accepted by others in the field it's pretty certain that he or she is simply pushing propaganda and paid to do so.
We already know tRUmp watches a ton of Fox, even using Fox and Friends as launching points for twitter ramblings (you can match up timestamps on posts with Fox and Friends talking points). That indicates that Fox (at least portions of it) are nothing more than a propaganda network.
Hell Roger Ailes even admitted he wanted a pro GOP network.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog.../01/AG1W7XtH_blog.html?utm_term=.b501f904875d
A memo entitled “A Plan for Putting the GOP on TV News,” buried in the the Nixon library details a plan between Ailes and the White House to bring pro-administration stories to television networks around the country. It reads: “Today television news is watched more often than people read newspapers, than people listen to the radio, than people read or gather any other form of communication. The reason: People are lazy. With television you just sit—watch—listen. The thinking is done for you.”
Politco did a good piece with John Dean:
Although he’s never stopped reliving the Watergate years, Dean seems surprised at how what he went through 45 years ago remains relevant today. Not that everything is the same—for one, he thinks that in today’s media and political environment, Nixon might have finished his term.
“There’s social media, there’s the internet; the news cycles are faster. I think Watergate would have occurred at a much more accelerated speed than the 928 days it took to go from the arrest at the Watergate to the conviction of Haldeman and Ehrlichman and [John] Mitchell, et al.,”
Dean said. “There’s more likelihood he might have survived if there’d been a Fox News.”
https://www.politico.com/magazine/s...ave-survived-if-thered-been-a-fox-news-216207
Imagine, Nixon who committed the most known despicable act a POTUS has thus far might have survived with a propaganda network
