First, the fact that I acknowledged tariffs are a glorified consumer tax of the American people themselves should have tipped the hat that I'm not generally disputing Hockey's characterization of this aid package as "socialism", or that it is technically tax revenue. After all, virtually any money dispensed by the federal government is ultimately drawn from tax revenue; that is the source of almost all its income. However, I was gently pushing back against this 'socialist' portrayal, particularly in the context of his dog whistle "my taxes", as I've already clarified, since the cause of government intervention in the market (i.e. farmer aid) was originally government intervention in the market in the first place (i.e. tariffs) .
Second, while we all accept that tariffs are a glorified tax of the American people, they are technically a tax on the traders importing the goods. They raise prices to pass this onto consumers, but this is not a tax of the American people themselves, directly.
Third, and finally, if you presume to lecture someone about "tariffs", the first thing you should do is learn how to spell the fucking word. No, don't try to play the 'muh typo' evasion. You misspelled it twice the same way in this single post. The only times it is spelled correctly was in your copy-paste of what I wrote, and the copy-paste of what you extracted from the article.
You blathering nitwit.