Y
Yanoush
Guest
Why were neck locks banned with such high level guys. I though all subs were legal at the black belt level.
Why were neck locks banned with such high level guys. I though all subs were legal at the black belt level.
as much as it was wrong, pe de pano did win... he played the rules to his advantage and thats all there is to it.
Absolutely. There is no debate here. If the rules state can openers are legal in closed guard, then they're legal case closed. Monson followed the rules TO THE LETTER and you can't penalize someone for following the damn rules. If PDP wanted the can opener to end, he could have opened guard - Monson would have been forced to stop (or be DQ). Tapping out to a legal move means you tapped out plain and simple.
To see the stupidity of awarding PDP the win, lets take other legal moves. Lets say I attempt a scissor sweep...and you tap. You tapped, yet I lose. Lets say I attempt a straight ankle lock and turn towards the outside (legal) and you tap. Yet I lose. I put knee-on-belly and you just can't breathe, so you tap, yet I lose.
Monson should have been awarded the win, or at least just continue the match. Awarding PDP the win was absolute bullshit.
Actually pe de Pano lost. He did not play to the rules since they don't prohibit tapping out. Monson was the one who played to the rules.
maybe thats why monson is one of the only high level grapplers i cant watch-he plays by the rules-meaning he will do whatever neccesary to win, even if it is the most boring match in the world
maybe thats why monson is one of the only high level grapplers i cant watch-he plays by the rules-meaning he will do whatever neccesary to win, even if it is the most boring match in the world
Yea, it's hard to tell what to make of it.
Here's how things would work in my world:
Can-openers to open closed guard should be allowed, but must be released as soon as the guard opens. If the opponent taps during a can-opener without having opened his guard, then the tap is invalid, but the match does not stop. You reset in a 'bottom man on back with knees up and feet on floor, top man on his knees with hands on bottom man's knees' open-guard starting position. No points or advantages awarded. And if you refuse/are unable to continue, then you forefeit, because you were not hurt in an illegal hold.
Problem solved.
as much as it was wrong, pe de pano did win... he played the rules to his advantage and thats all there is to it.
They are worse than football refs.
http://www.dailymotion.com/related/...jeff-monson-vs-pe-de-pano-cruz_sport?from=rss
I don't like Pe, but he was right this time.. If the cervical is applied, and you tap, its over, Monson is disqualified. But the whole video is entertaining as hell if you know Portuguese. Specially funny after Monson takes the ref down, and Sonequinha, a 5 foot dwarf calls him out. I don't know if this was posted here already.. I wish there were subtitles for you guys..
What kind of grappler are you, really, if a can opener is such a huge problem.
FYI, in training at my gym we use can openers, neck cranks, heel hooks, or whatever. So I really have no sympathy for this kind of pussy shit.
I have even had my collar bone pulled on.
pe de pano is one of the best black belts ever..
Say what you want about this win - but its still a win.. and i for one think its hillarious.
I would be pissed if i was monson.. but Pe De Pano used the rules to his advantage... and won.. simple as that.
thats ok if you train catch wrestling. In BJJ, that is a no-no.