D
Deleted member 457759
Guest
If Mexico and America went to war they better double the amount of out houses at the female camps.
Certainly NAFTA was a big step to create a free trade zone, but I think the ultimate goal is to drop the borders to allow free flow of people like the EU.
The policies enacted are encouraging large migrations from Mexico to the US and eventually just due to demographics the desire for a border there will wane over time. Then notice that the Southern Mexico border isn't open..
It's still progressing, so I could see a single currency at some point. Just like the Euro. I don't think the policy makers will just stop, when there is further integration work that can be done.
Just shooting in the dark here but would you say the appearance of an Amero currency could happen as a direct result of a collapse in the petrol dollar? Seems like that would be a good alternative as some countries (minus Gaddafi now lol) would like to undermine the us dollar as the world reserve currency.
Add to this their massive size (130 million) and they could really be a force.
Mexico doesn't have the smarts to be a force. Name a single Mexican scientist of note.
JThat shit seems straight out of a White Nationalist newsletter that Cold Front subscribes to.
Mexico is actually a middle-income nation with fairly high indexes of human development. They're about on par with a lot of Eastern and Southern European nations when it comes to this.
Add to this their massive size (130 million) and they could really be a force.
That's all it's really about (China, India, Japan)
China and India both have ten times the population that Mexico has.
Japan is around the same size as Mexico, but much, much richer - and there's no evidence Mexico has what it takes to close the gap, unless Japan stops breeding altogether.
In the next hundred years, a lot could happen.
A hundred years ago, these were the largest national economies on the planet, according to the economist Angus Maddison.
So there's been some switching of names some changes to the list, but there's also been a consistency we should expect to continue.1. United States
2. China
3. Germany
4. Russia
5. U.K.
6. India
7. France
8. Italy
9. Japan
10. Spain
*****
And today?
1. United States
2. China
3. Japan
4. Germany
5. France
6. U.K.
7. Brazil
8. Russia
9. Italy
10. India
******
Anyone who is saying they can't see it happening, Or they don't think so is clearly not remembering that world war 2 wasn't even 100 years ago, and look how much that changed the balance of the world.
ANYTHING can happen in 100 years.
Fair enough, but those nations are also experiencing big changes. Wealth inequality, demographics, globalization, diminishing resources (water), you name it. Things are changing extremely fast.
They experienced similarly large changes in the last century. I mean, what countries have faced more changes than China and Russia over the last one hundred years?
Yet they still sit near the top.