Social Meme Thread v.120: Ronaldo Was Right!?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Poking the bear

Hardly. I'm just puzzled why I'd be quoted twice in separate threads if only a single sentence of my response was going to be addressed. That's why I didn't bother the first time, but I'll return the favor. I also feel that the vague criticisms are mixing up things that stand separate. It's like the guy in the Taliban 6 year old wife thread who claimed that the post-Vatican II sexual abuse scandals "are not the whole of the religion" as if it were any part of it at all.

As if it were not criminal under church canon law; as if for the 3-4% of clergy accused and implicated, it's not a grave violation of the sacrament of holy orders with a heap of mortal sins stacked on top of that. As If. This is to say that the abuse, corruption, and sins inherent to humanity does not invalidate creed, doctrine, theology, or tradition. And if we're going to discuss the church as an Institution in direct regards to its cultural and historical interface, then there is a lot of meat on those bones in the other direction.



So your contention is that Jesus,

Nope.

Is it yours that Jesus lied and the gates of hell prevailed? When did that happen exactly, and what year was the Church of Cherry Brigand founded?



It certainly needed to be done and that was the path and method of which He chose.

Exactly.

Sent you a DM to keep the memes flowing.

It can be meme'd.







On another note, and aside from this point: perhaps the most bothersome thing about Protestantism is the denial of the greatest thing about Catholicism. On what basis they reject it, I do not know. I am certainly in no position to do so.

GOSPELS

Jesus took bread, and blessed, and broke it, and gave it to the disciples and said, “Take, eat; this is my body.” And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink of it, all of you; for this is my blood of the new covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins." (Matthew 26:26-28)

And as they were eating, he took bread, and blessed, and broke it, and gave it to them, and said, “Take; this is my body.” And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, and they all drank of it. And he said to them, “This is my blood of the new covenant, which is poured out for many." (Mark 14:22-25)

And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he said, “Take this, and divide it among yourselves; for I tell you that from now on I shall not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.” And he took bread, and when he had given thanks he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” And likewise the cup after supper, saying, “This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood." (Luke 22:16-20)

^^ But is it symbolic? Maybe.

So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me. This is the bread which came down from heaven, not such as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live forever.” (John 6:53-58)

^^ Okay, clearly not.

ST. PAUL'S EPISTLES (1 Corinthians 11:23-30)

For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, “This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.

Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.


^ And this is exactly why it should only be received when in a state of grace, for which another sacrament was instituted to deal with.

CHURCH FATHERS





 

RIP Ozzy. Now, even the Hulkster is gone.

23jJXNG8Vng8rAQV.jpeg


8VUOR4HtJlhpM173.jpeg


 
Last edited:
Who's that?

And no, I'm not asking about the man in the white shirt lol
Oh boy, this might take awhile.
-So there was a No Kings protest in Salt Lake City last month.
-An organization called 50-50-1 provided volunteer "peacekeepers" and they were specifically told not to be armed.
- One of them (Matt Alder) sees a masked individual (Arthur Gamboa) openly carrying an AR15 and immediately pulls out a pistol and opens fire on him. A stray round hits and kills another protester (Afa Ah Loo).
-Alder tells the cops that Gamboa was running towards a group of protesters with his rifle aimed at them. Dumbass cops take his word for it and immediately arrest Gamboa and charge him with felony murder. He's labeled as a "domestic terrorist" and "potential mass shooter."
-Video comes out showng that Gamboa was walking with the rifle pointed at the ground and didn't even have a magazine loaded. The same video shows Alder immediately opening fire on him.
-Gamboa has a history of openly carrying long guns as a supporting protester with the footprint on social media to prove it. He's the furthest thing from some right wing MAGA goof.
-Openly carrying a long gun in Utah is 100% legal.
-Gamboa is finally released and the charges are dropped after he was held twice as long as he legally should've been. Alder hasn't even been arrested yet and the only reason his name came out is because some 4chan autists found him. It's like public officials are protecting him yet they were so quick to throw Gamboa under the bus who broke no laws.

I just don't understand why he hasn't been arrested yet for obstruction, aggravated assault, and some form of manslaughter. It's been well over a month now.
 
Oh boy, this might take awhile.
-So there was a No Kings protest in Salt Lake City last month.
-An organization called 50-50-1 provided volunteer "peacekeepers" and they were specifically told not to be armed.
- One of them (Matt Alder) sees a masked individual (Arthur Gamboa) openly carrying an AR15 and immediately pulls out a pistol and opens fire on him. A stray round hits and kills another protester (Afa Ah Loo).
-Alder tells the cops that Gamboa was running towards a group of protesters with his rifle aimed at them. Dumbass cops take his word for it and immediately arrest Gamboa and charge him with felony murder. He's labeled as a "domestic terrorist" and "potential mass shooter."
-Video comes out showng that Gamboa was walking with the rifle pointed at the ground and didn't even have a magazine loaded. The same video shows Alder immediately opening fire on him.
-Gamboa has a history of openly carrying long guns as a supporting protester with the footprint on social media to prove it. He's the furthest thing from some right wing MAGA goof.
-Openly carrying a long gun in Utah is 100% legal.
-Gamboa is finally released and the charges are dropped after he was held twice as long as he legally should've been. Alder hasn't even been arrested yet and the only reason his name came out is because some 4chan autists found him. It's like public officials are protecting him yet they were so quick to throw Gamboa under the bus who broke no laws.

I just don't understand why he hasn't been arrested yet for obstruction, aggravated assault, and some form of manslaughter. It's been well over a month now.
This is interesting, I read the news daily and this never came up. Thanks
 
I don’t get this at all

An animal might be able to be trained to do tasks, even seemingly unlikely tasks, that have a quantifiable outcome. We'll know immediately if they're good at it or not.

If an animal correctly identifies cancerous cells despite it making no sense that they'd be able to, for example, then sure: let them continue doing that.

If you're trusting the animal to do tasks that don't have an immediately quantifiably accurate outcome, like sifting through CVs, probably don't let them do that. We won't know immediately if they're good at it, despite the data it can use to justify it's decisions.

AI is basically an animal that can be trained to do tricks. Nothing more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top