My LOGICAL is perfectly fine. So, i'm actually able to watch fights and gauge how well a fighter did in 5 rounds with my own two eyes. Like I said, why even watch fights man? It sounds like all you do is scrounge up stats at the end of the year and then try to determine how "well" a fighter did. You don't seem to understand that people can give credit to fighters that lose every round of fight. It doesn't tell you how close the rounds were, and by the majority of the predictions we all saw for his last fight, people said Nick was going to get knocked the fuck out and it wasn't even going to stay competitive.
Tell me, when the majority gives that kind of a prediction, and Nick ends up going 5 full rounds and landing a competitive amount of significant strikes, did he do better than expected, or not better than expected? Or is that just going right over your head as well?