Meltzer: #183 - Over 500k, but less than #182

Holy crap
You are bad at this

Yes you can lose & do better than expected

But no rational person thought Diaz would lose 89% of the rounds, so obviously Diaz did NOT (I repeat NOT) do better than expected (esp since he was FAVORED in one fight)

Made Condit run, made GSP GSP even harder, made Silva juice.
 
Holy crap
You are bad at this

Yes you can lose & do better than expected

But no rational person thought Diaz would lose 89% of the rounds, so obviously Diaz did NOT (I repeat NOT) do better than expected (esp since he was FAVORED in one fight)

And do you always have to type replies like a raging midget?
 
Your logical has holes EVERYWHERE

If an MLB team is expected to win 90 games & wins 70 instead, you cannot say they did "better than expected" because you like the team & enjoyed the games lol

My LOGICAL is perfectly fine. So, i'm actually able to watch fights and gauge how well a fighter did in 5 rounds with my own two eyes. Like I said, why even watch fights man? It sounds like all you do is scrounge up stats at the end of the year and then try to determine how "well" a fighter did. You don't seem to understand that people can give credit to fighters that lose every round of fight. It doesn't tell you how close the rounds were, and by the majority of the predictions we all saw for his last fight, people said Nick was going to get knocked the fuck out and it wasn't even going to stay competitive.

Tell me, when the majority gives that kind of a prediction, and Nick ends up going 5 full rounds and landing a competitive amount of significant strikes, did he do better than expected, or not better than expected? Or is that just going right over your head as well?
 
My LOGICAL is perfectly fine. So, i'm actually able to watch fights and gauge how well a fighter did in 5 rounds with my own two eyes. Like I said, why even watch fights man? It sounds like all you do is scrounge up stats at the end of the year and then try to determine how "well" a fighter did. You don't seem to understand that people can give credit to fighters that lose every round of fight. It doesn't tell you how close the rounds were, and by the majority of the predictions we all saw for his last fight, people said Nick was going to get knocked the fuck out and it wasn't even going to stay competitive.

Tell me, when the majority gives that kind of a prediction, and Nick ends up going 5 full rounds and landing a competitive amount of significant strikes, did he do better than expected, or not better than expected? Or is that just going right over your head as well?


Damn you suck at comprehension lol
 
And do you always have to type replies like a raging midget?

& you suck at debating

But you fit perfect on ignore
So enjoy the last - incorrect & uninformed word

I won't see it

Next time you watch a baseball game & your team loses 8-1 (which is what Diaz % was in his last three fights on scorecards), keep telling people how COMPETITIVE the game was, because they got on base each inning.

:icon_chee
 
& you suck at debating

But you fit perfect on ignore
So enjoy the last - incorrect & uninformed word

I won't see it

Next time you watch a baseball game & your team loses 8-1 (which is what Diaz % was in his last three fights on scorecards), keep telling people how COMPETITIVE the game was, because they got on base each inning.

:icon_chee

I couldn't give a flying fuck about baseball.

Midget raged so hard, he ignored me.
 
182 did 800k and saw he said 600-700k for 183
 
182 did 800k and saw he said 600-700k for 183

He said tonight that the VERY early estimates put it at about 650k, but that can vary greatly in the next few weeks. It was not anything near a final number
But he said even if its lower (& it might be) that it still did well for a non title fight

PS ... you are a real good poster man. I like your post
 
Back
Top