News McGregor back in court

This rape happened weeks after Khabib took his soul so you can imagine the rage of that is what prompted this.

If he loses the trail his reputation is done and Khabib will have successfully ended him now and forever moreso that any fighter has ever ended another fighter before both in and outside the ring.
 
Just reading the way Lawrence replied to questioning gave me the impression that he was a wise ass weasel. I wonder if he came off that way in person to the jury, too.
Did you notice Mcgregor, Lawrence and the security guard too, all used the exact same wording to describe the vibe of the night btw. They clearly all planned what to say. Very unusual you ask 3 men what the vibe was like and all 3 use the same wording
 
Damn Conor is a legit thug and scumbag. He’s irredeemable as a human being

For real.

He threw James under the bus in a police interview - when, I now believe - James did not have sex with Nikita; McGregor did that to deflect blame and throw someone else in the mix, and then he coerced James, by... defacto intimidation, to go to the police station and say he had sex with her / otherwise he'd be saying McGregor is lying...

Drags this poor guy through this, nevermind the woman he brutalized.

He's a fucking piece of shit.

Fuck his BJJ or fighting skills.. if I saw him I'd knock him the fuck out. What a fucking scumbag.
 
CdnWg30UEAEiQOe


Anyone remember this shit lmao. This must have been a decade ago now. Damn where does the time go. There was a vid too chick was recording of him and he was clearly tweaking off coke.
From this angle it looks like a McGregor cosplayer. From those 2 pictures the chick is also giving a whatever , not impressed by this dude vibes.
 
Closing statements were given. Not sure how long it will take the jury to come to a decision though
 
Last edited:
Is Ireland like other countries where civil cases don't need to be proven to beyond a reasonable doubt?

On the subject of the verdict, Judge Owens tells the jury that only nine of them must agree on a verdict.

They won't be asked for a majority or unanimous like in criminal trials.

Edit: sorry, just realised this may not answer your question but the quote above was something I was wondering about in regards to how many members of the jury had to go with guilty for him to lose the case.
 
I am just going to leave this here, since a few idiots here seem to be introducing doubt into something fairly straightforward:

We have the medical report by the doctor, by an expert on sexual assault, and by enforcement officer who saw her. This describes multiple injuries across her body as being severe, and even beyond what the experts had seen.

We have Conor's DNA. We have confirmed testimony of a tampon incrusted into her vagina that was surgically removed that indicates possible vaginal tear.

We have evidence of her clothes being torn.

We have records of her being traumatized, incapable of working, having panic attacks, for long after the incident.

We know she tried to pursue a criminal case, not civil. There are reports of her refusing a million payout.

We know of her house being broken into.

We have precedent of Conor being aggressive, and multiple accusations that overlap in significant ways to this, involving physical and sexual violence.

We don't have James' DNA in her.

We have footage of CCTV showing her with Lawrence oscillating back and forth in the hotel after Conor left, that's it.

So, what are we to conclude? That she beat herself up and faked trauma for years, fooling doctors of her mental distress? That Lawrence had sex with her but left no traces of it in her body, miraculously? That she pursued criminal charges and refused a buyout because that way she would later cash in more? That her boyfriend beat her up for being a bad girl and then she decided they could fake this as being caused by Conor? That despite people saying the injuries were abnormal, they were either self-inflicted or derived from elsewhere?

She had a vaginal tear yet she was fine to party and flirt with James Lwarence for the rest of the evening. How come Danielle Kealy didn't notice Nikita's clothes were ripped after she had sex with Conor?
 

Edit: sorry, just realised this may not answer your question but the quote above was something I was wondering about in regards to how many members of the jury had to go with guilty for him to lose the case.

To answer the person's question, no, they do not need to find him guilty beyond reasonable doubt in a civil case -- They just need to find it probable that he did it.
 
2 days apparently, so tomorrow or Friday. Hard to know what happened here, obviously. Conor is Conor so I wouldn't be surprised, and she's for the streets as she was in a hotel room with other guys and lying to her partner at the time.
 
hopefully something sticks this time. it's time this guy just went away.
 
He won't learn shit. The fines tiny. He walk away laughing knowing he receives no criminal problems.

Joke of a system we have in this world.
 
Just reading the way Lawrence replied to questioning gave me the impression that he was a wise ass weasel. I wonder if he came off that way in person to the jury, too.
He just looks like a scumbag
 
Back
Top