Law Matt Gaetz to become Attorney General

Is Matt Gaetz qualified to be AG

  • Total voters
    144
idrankyourbeer said:
where is this deposition you speak of?

show us the deposition where he repeatedly took the fifth when asked about paying an underaged girl for sex and then refused to give any statements on the matter. and when the house committee came knocking, he tucked his dick and clucked. maybe molestini cheetolini had a golf tournament going on at the time and matt "likes 'em young" gaetz got invited, so it's totally understandable. it's always better to be known as a rapist than a bad golfer.

sounds like something an innocent person would do hey, and he totally doesn't fuck little girls much like his accomplice who is currently serving an 11 year prison sentence just to own the libs.

but seeing how you've dedicated your entire identity to championing for rapists and sexual predators, regardless of what happens to your good friend matt gaetz i'm sure you'll get behind him, just like he gets behind little girls.
Click to expand...
The problem is crap like 10k in Venmo payments, the testimony of the teenagers he was sexing up, Gaetz being afraid to answer questions under oath, his wingman serving 11 years, etc, aren’t really all that convincing.

You need something really ironclad. Like how a few Chinese spy informants and a cryptic email saying “10 for the big guy” proves Joe Biden runs a global crime syndicate. I mean, unless you’re a woke bitch.
 
DoctorTaco said:
“You can’t understand the infallible, holy and inspired word of an all knowing, all powerful, all loving god unless you read the stuff written about the people who followed his followers”.

lol ok
Click to expand...
No, that's not what I said but it does sound really ignorant when you say it.

You can't understand what they meant by the scriptures without the commentary they wrote about the scriptures and the spirituality that was passed on from person to person from Jesus through his disciples all the way down to today.

These are all one thing and always have been one thing.

The scripture and the extra biblical literature emerged together and have never been taken apart from each other.
 
terrapin said:
You can't understand what they meant by the scriptures without the commentary they wrote about the scriptures
Click to expand...
Sounds like god should have done a more thorough job with his holy, infallible word if it can’t be understood as is and requires human commentary to be understood.
 
DoctorTaco said:
Sounds like god should have done a more thorough job with his holy, infallible word if it can’t be understood as is and requires human commentary to be understood.
Click to expand...
It sounds like if you don't read the Bible alongside of the extra biblical literature that went with it, and grow in the subjective experiential spirituality it produces, you can't understand what they meant at all....


It's basically that simple.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SKYNET said:
Why are they not charging him if he's admitted he's guilty of committing a crime?

*Side NOTE for the chaperone in the room* Everyone here assumes I'm going to bat for him. I'm asking simple questions.
Click to expand...
I'm not aware of him admitting guilt but as far as I know the main reason no charges were brought against him is because people that attend drug fueled sex parties aren't credible witnesses.
 
SKYNET said:
I have a feeling I will never get a simple yes or no to this question. Quite a phenomenon
Click to expand...
Because the answer doesn't prove his innocence. Some of you guys have been chomping the bit for years claiming Biden is the Big Guy but was he ever charged with a crime? "But, but, Hunter's laptop..." "But, but, the Committee's report..."

Not much of a difference right? Except the MAGA Committee in the House investigated Biden and found their witnesses were foreign agents. In contrast the House investigated Gaetz and corroborated the allegations. The DoJ never indicted because they didn't think they could win the case but maybe this report would have made a difference. I say would have because after Trump repeatedly instructed the DoJ during his last term there's no reason to think this time will be any different.
 
Andy Capp said:
The state deserves a zealous prosecution of the case. What's she supposed to say? Uh, not sure but like let's give it a go?
Click to expand...
I think she totally screwed the case by arrogantly ignoring ethical protocols. If anyone is to blame the most for Trump not being tried for his crimes I'd say it's her.
 
terrapin said:
It sounds like if you don't read the Bible alongside of the extra biblical literature that went with it, and grow in the subjective experiential spirituality it produces, you can't understand what they meant at all....


It's basically that simple.
Click to expand...
lol at some bullshit word salad and then finishing it up with, “it’s that simple”.

It’s just crazy to me that the Bible says it is the literal word of god, yet according to you it can’t be understood without reading stuff that isnt the word of god.

Feels like the big guy fucked up on that one
 
DoctorTaco said:
lol at some bullshit word salad and then finishing it up with, “it’s that simple”.

It’s just crazy to me that the Bible says it is the literal word of god, yet according to you it can’t be understood without reading stuff that isnt the word of god.

Feels like the big guy fucked up on that one
Click to expand...
Saying that you have to read the extra biblical commentary about the Bible and walk the path of spirituality that it teaches in order to understand it is word salad to you?

I don't even believe you mean that.
 
terrapin said:
Saying that you have to read the extra biblical commentary about the Bible and walk the path of spirituality that it teaches in order to understand it is word salad to you?

I don't even believe you mean that.
Click to expand...
Call me crazy, but if the Bible is the word of god then it’s probably enough on its own. But hey, you do you. I hear those Joseph smith and Charlie Russell characters have a lot to say on the topic of extra biblical interpretation. You’d love them
 
DoctorTaco said:
Call me crazy, but if the Bible is the word of god then it’s probably enough on its own. But hey, you do you. I hear those Joseph smith and Charlie Russell characters have a lot to say on the topic of extra biblical interpretation. You’d love them
Click to expand...
I can't remember a single important piece of literature that anyone ever asked anyone to read without them expanding on the meaning behind the literature through commentary and discussion.


Now imagine that that important body of literature was also meant to transform a person's consciousness. Do you think there might need to be a community surrounding that starting with the author that passes that on??

I mean come on man. This is the most basic possible insight.
 
terrapin said:
I can't remember a single important piece of literature that anyone ever asked anyone to read without them expanding on the meaning behind the literature through commentary and discussion
Click to expand...
Cool. Quote the scripture that says you have to read commentary to understand it.
 
DoctorTaco said:
Cool. Quote the scripture that says you have to read commentary to understand it.
Click to expand...

The thing you don't know that you have to understand is that the tradition came first before the scriptures.... And once there were scriptures the tradition verbal and written and the scriptures were always held together.

You're assuming there should be some time where we would have to justify why we read something other than the scriptures, but the fact is that's not even how the bible developed.

t's all throughout the scriptures to read follow the traditions handed down to you written or verbal. Paul says it directly. The scripture itself tells us to follow the traditions passed on to us..

The viewpoint that is found nowhere in the scripture... not even in one place.. is that you should only read the scriptures. It is not stated anywhere in the Bible ever. Not even once that you should only read the Bible.

Not only does it to tell us to listen to even the verbal traditions handed down to us, but it also quotes literature that itself is not in the scriptures.

I don't know why you're arguing for this because you don't even care about the scriptures yourself, but you are 100% upside down for certain man. It's not even debatable.

Paul says that much Christian teaching is to be found in the tradition which is handed down by word of mouth (2 Tim. 2:2). He instructs us to “stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter” (2 Thess. 2:15).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@DoctorTaco


The non-canonical books referenced in the Bible includes non-Biblical cultures and lost works of known or unknown status. By the "Bible" is meant those books recognized by Christians and Jews as being part of Old Testament (or Tanakh) as well as those recognized by most Christians as being part of the Biblical apocrypha or of the Deuterocanon.

It may also include books of the Anagignoskomena (Deuterocanonical books § In Eastern Orthodoxy) that are accepted only by Eastern Orthodox Christians. For the purposes of this article, "referenced" can mean direct quotations, paraphrases, or allusions, which in some cases are known only because they have been identified as such by ancient writers, or the citation of a work or author.
 
SKYNET said:
Has he been charged with a crime?
Click to expand...

SKYNET said:
So not charged with a crime then ?
Click to expand...

SKYNET said:
So was he charged with a crime Yes or No?
Click to expand...

SKYNET said:
Why are they not charging him if he's admitted he's guilty of committing a crime?
Click to expand...

SKYNET said:
I'm not forgiving him. I know he's fucked. Im asking if/ then why he hasnt been charged?
Click to expand...

SKYNET said:
seems odd that they are letting this guy off the hook for some serious crimes
Click to expand...
My theory is that the DOJ doesn't/can't charge people for breaking state laws. They enforce federal laws. Seems like they looked at possible sex trafficking, but didn't have enough evidence to charge him for that.

The statutory rape and drug stuff would have to be investigated and charged by a state LE agency. Doing that to someone with his profile would likely run past the governor and I don't see Little Ronnie Meatballs wanting to step in that pile of shit.
 
Poon Goon said:
My theory is that the DOJ doesn't/can't charge people for breaking state laws. They enforce federal laws. Seems like they looked at possible sex trafficking, but didn't have enough evidence to charge him for that.
Click to expand...
not enough evidence? interesting
Poon Goon said:
The statutory rape and drug stuff would have to be investigated and charged by a state LE agency.
Click to expand...
looking forward to that, hopefully sooner than later.
Poon Goon said:
Doing that to someone with his profile would likely run past the governor and I don't see Little Ronnie Meatballs wanting to step in that pile of shit.
Click to expand...
criminals should be behind bars. period. Desantis looks shady in that light. appreciate you finally answering my questions
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,568
Messages
58,447,827
Members
176,040
Latest member
ValeTudoPrideUFC

Share this page

Back
Top