Man explains how quantum computers work / how they exploit parallel universes / will lead to AI

[Andy Capp]

Meh, I just don't believe parallel universes exist. Now I'm not nearly as smart as those who do, but I think their belief is a kin to folks believin
g in God. I just don't believe there is a parallel universe exponentially expanding where each one of us causes billions of new ones to exist every second by our every moment decisions. For this to be true, in a parallel universe somewhere each one of us would have won the powerball lottery, and in another we would have been raped to death by a wild hyena. We'd be married to every other person alive today as well, and I just created another one where I didn't just type "dcedhefs" but simply a different string of letters but everything else in this world would be the same as that new parallel universe.

Or maybe I completely misunderstand the idea of infinite parallel universes.

There's more than one idea, but it sounds like you understand it enough for this discussion. It sure sounds weird, but so's everything else about quantum physics; they've all turned out to be true so far though.

Quantum computing and AI go hand in hand, and I am extremely excited about the advent of these technologies. There are some risks, but the utility that they offer will change the world in a positive way.

Interesting. I don't have any sort of response because that's way too weird for me, but I had assumed they had a different idea that they were presenting in a way that would excite people.

That's true. The parallel universe idea has some far-reaching implications. It has the bible thumpers really worried because it obviates the need for a creator. Since every possibility is played out somewhere there's no special "here".

Well, I do understand enough about computers to understand how they operate. The fact the top scientists with the skillset your require are afraid of future AI is telling.



As usual a guy who doesn't know a thing about God or the Bible thinks they know a lot, enough to make broad general sweeping assumptions. Smells like pride to me. I bet I know a lot more about technology then you know about the spiritual. But that's another topic for another time.

You have it wrong. My calling makes me a servant, or a disciple if you will. I also do not like my calling, i do so out of obedience. God told me to write the book. So it's not pride you're hearing, more like a burdened relationship. But go study a book for 18 years, write and book for free and get back to me. It's a determined soul you are hearing who is tired of games and nonsense. A lot is required of me so forgive me if you hear some base in my voice.



God isn't going to wipe out the world with AI. AI will be a strong delusion (lie) just as I pointed out in my first post. God wants mankind saved and he sent his Son to do it. I am one of the few powerful ministers in this end times who will try and reason with humanity. My book will be a large part of that reasoning. If mankind rejects what God shows them, via my book but possibility other powerful voices, they'll only have the alternative.

Mankind by and large will choose to serve the technical system rather than the spiritual system. It will be their loss because what they choose to serve will be their downfall.

So, the accusation of fear mongering was on target. It's all about selling those books. You're a joke, and not powerful at all. People like Ripskater listen to people like you because they don't feel like thinking for themselves. Nothing more.

TS, if you're really worried, it's these robots you should be concerned about, not some quantum computer that probably doesn't even work yet:



Incidentally, Boston Dynamics, the company making the robots, and D-Wave, are Google properties, iirc. They're the folks you should really be worried about.

 

[Bagatur]

I really dont believe that AI will ever outperform humans. for one thing, they can never out-do humans creating AI.
AI will never be smarter than humans, simply because AI's learning algorithms are still created by humans. AI will no be able to do science.

 

[Kframe]

Watched. It.

There is a reason this guy sounds more like a philosopher/metaphysical thinker than a scientist. The technical spin on the coming deception they will call AI is a lie. What is coming is spiritual in creation yet compromised and is now demonic.

The False Prophet will lie and tell the world AI has come and humanities building of the computer made all this possible. So AI will be mankind's victory. A present to himself, if you will. That's a lie and scripture explains this:

2 Thessalonians 2:9-12

Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them a strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

That strong delusion and lie in not the Antichrist like many teachers purport... that lie will be AI (Artificial Intelligence) has come to us. They'll sell it as technology yet it's anything but. It will be demonic (spiritual) yet cursed.

Oh for fucks sake.. Take your tin foil hat off and put down the religious extremism coffee. This right here, is why so few people can take Christians seriously, when we start spouting ignorant stupid bullshit like this. Makes sound as nut worthy as most Islamists.

 

[sub_thug]

I really dont believe that AI will ever outperform humans. for one thing, they can never out-do humans creating AI.
AI will never be smarter than humans, simply because AI's learning algorithms are still created by humans. AI will no be able to do science.

The idea is that AI will be able to write its own code at a certain point as a means of self-improvement/machine learning

 

[Bagatur]

The idea is that AI will be able to write its own code at a certain point as a means of self-improvement/machine learning

I understand what the idea is. I just dont see AI exceeding what it is programmed to do.

 

[Agent Mulder's Hair]

That's true. The parallel universe idea has some far-reaching implications. It has the bible thumpers really worried because it obviates the need for a creator. Since every possibility is played out somewhere there's no special "here".

So, the accusation of fear mongering was on target. It's all about selling those books. You're a joke, and not powerful at all. People like Ripskater listen to people like you because they don't feel like thinking for themselves. Nothing more.

TS, if you're really worried, it's these robots you should be concerned about, not some quantum computer that probably doesn't even work yet:



Incidentally, Boston Dynamics, the company making the robots, and D-Wave, are Google properties, iirc. They're the folks you should really be worried about.

That's not true at all. I'm Christian and i don't think quantum mechanics negates the existence of God at all.

Lol u should stop making generalizations and stop speaking for groups of people when u have no idea what you're talking about.

Btw I'm not gonna debate this with u because atheists have their heads stuck so far up their butts that they are convinced if u don't see things like they do then u must be ignorant somehow. (See what i did there?)

 

[ralphc1]

I think u missed the point in the airplane\horse analogy. He was saying that a plane is NOT a faster horse. Flying lets u utlize another whole dimension that the fastest horse ever would never be able to do. Flying opens up the dimension of height. He's saying that quantum computers will be like that, compared to normal computers.

Also he wasn't saying that nasa would use a qc to detect earth like planets. Nut we'll use them to figure out the logistics of how to go there.

I'm fully aware that he was making the distinction between the technology of land travel and the technology of heavier than air flight to many people who don't understand that flight wasn't something new in 1900. Animals had been flying for millions of years. Man had long used birds to deliver messages and hunt. Man had also been attempting to fly for thousands of years. There had been children's toy gliders found in ancient Egyptian tombs. Manned gliders and powered flight were in the testing stage. The Wright brothers patented a system of controlling the flight surfaces which was the only new technology. It made it possible to fly without crashing.

The other point he was trying to make is that the first airplane wasn't as fast as a horse but it rapidly surpassed it. He's inviting the listener to make the same comparison because his QC wasn't as fast as the computers of the time.

As far as his prediction not being QCs would be used to find planets. That isn't what his statement says. I posted it exactly as it was printed in the video. He literally [literally meaning actually in this case] said the planet would be found using QC.
"By 2018, NASA will have found a planet with oceans of water and an Earth-like atmosphere within 40 light years of Earth using a quantum computer; serious discussions about going there will begin."

It didn't say; "By 2018, NASA will have found a planet with oceans of water and an Earth-like atmosphere within 40 light years of Earth. Using a quantum computer, serious discussions about going there will begin.

 

[ralphc1]

The marketing of parallel universes is weird. When Brian Greene or Michio Kaku or whoever bring up the analogy that you exist in an infinite number of places with infinite variations- it seems dumbed down for public consumption.

I have wondered though, whether there is a parallel reality to ours, that is something more like waves of our everyday reality, that ripple out into a small dimension. We can all imagine that when we move our hand across our face. The reality of moving our hand could be trailing an artifact of its reality, sort of like seeing tracers when you're intoxicated. Those "tracers" might extend perpendicular to our spacetime dimensions. Or maybe it's more like echoes that never bounce off of anything. Something along those lines seems plausible because it's connected to reality.

Or it could be a chemical imbalance in the brain.

 

[Fawlty]

Or it could be a chemical imbalance in the brain.

Is that where all the strength of my gravity is going? Shit. I'd rather not weigh myself down with meds.

 

[ralphc1]

If I stick my dick into a portal, and the tip penetrates my alternate self, is it gay? Am I still straight since im penetrating.. me? I don't know.

How about how many alternate universes can you screw yourself in?

 

[ralphc1]

By the way, for those wondering what a quantum computer sort of does, I'll try to explain.

Suppose you flip a coin and cover it with your hand before you see it. Quantum mechanically it's in a superposition of states where it is both heads and tails at the same time. When you look at it, you collapse the wavefunction, and it becomes heads or tails with equal probability. Whatever it becomes is the reality in our universe, and whatever the other option is, the universe spits and the coin exists in the other parallel universe in the opposite state.

Normal computers use bits which are 0 and 1... basically off and on. You can make 4 numbers with two bits, which are 00, 01, 10, and 11 in binary. So to make those 4 numbers, you need, you to turn two bits off, 1 on and 1 off, 1 off and 1 on, and two on. This is usually done one at a time.

A quantum computer uses qbits which are based on quantum superposition... they are off and on at the same time. So with two qbits, you can simultaneous create 4 numbers at once instead of one at a time.

That's the basic idea at least.

But you can never be certain which number you are creating which doesn't seem like something you would want in a computer. Is 2 + 2 = 4 or maybe 5? Maybe create the infinite improbability drive?

 

[ralphc1]

You're in for a rude awakening. This technical system was built for one ultimate purpose. Total control.

No civilization or society has ever praised a system that led to total control by those on the top.

Isn't that what religion is?

 

[ralphc1]

LOL. I don't share my identity on here and that's as straightforward as it gets (common sense you lack). Many have found my book online and have thanked me for it. Others have stolen the contents because it's valuable and very truthful. I don't hide, I just don't let everyone on here know of my identity because I would get trolled to oblivion. If you can't see or understand that, I suggest you drop your science books and live in the real world awhile.

You call yourself a Christian yet compare me with Muslim extremist? Lol who do you value as a Christian? Joel Osteen? Do yourself a favor and actually read your Bible. God has always called the base and broken of the generation not those who look good on TV. Also, your accusations against me don't hold water. I am neither prideful or extreme. I am absolutely faithful and obedient. You would say the same if John the Baptist was at some ocean doing the same work he did 2000 years ago.

You'd be like, "Hey John, quit exalting yourself. Go sit in church and learn from a pastor with a degree. God didn't call you! You're a nutcase if you think God speaks to you."

Many have said if Elijah showed up today and walked into a church building he would get thrown out.

And before you say, "...but...but...but, you're not John the Baptist or Elijah!"

I serve the same God so that point is moot.

The sad truth is many of the real who exist today are rejected just like it was in Jesus time.

And the only prideful one in here is you. I said I would answer questions on here and the only questions you have asked me is what do I do for a living?

Ask me real questions about the topic at hand or anything about the Bible in accordance with the topic and I will answer if I can.

Maybe you don't ask because you won't like my answers. Maybe they'll challenge your worldview a bit too much? Lol.

Did God tell you to tell those preachers to sell shoes?

 

[ralphc1]

Every part. Just explain it again please, if you don't mind.

Somebody did a whole lot of drugs!

 

[Agent Mulder's Hair]

Isn't that what religion is?

Did God tell you to tell those preachers to sell shoes?

Stop your anti religion bs itt. Want to spew that crap then start your own thread.

 

[cooks1]

All I can say if that I am so grateful that I am perfectly positioned in time to enjoy the brief interval of super hot, 100% life like female sex robots before the machines take the next leap and wipe us all out.

 

[Andy Capp]

That's not true at all. I'm Christian and i don't think quantum mechanics negates the existence of God at all.

Lol u should stop making generalizations and stop speaking for groups of people when u have no idea what you're talking about.

Btw I'm not gonna debate this with u because atheists have their heads stuck so far up their butts that they are convinced if u don't see things like they do then u must be ignorant somehow. (See what i did there?)

You're also not calling yourself a "powerful minister" with your youtube videos and books warning of impending doom either, so my post wasn't directed at you.
If you want to discuss the theological implications with those of like mind, be my guest. This is a case of trying to tie philosophy to science and I enthusiastically reject the notion.
I'm not saying you can't believe in God and believe in science at the same time. The issue is when you mix them to try to prove the Devil is coming as in the case of the person I quoted.

 

[rj144]

But you can never be certain which number you are creating which doesn't seem like something you would want in a computer. Is 2 + 2 = 4 or maybe 5? Maybe create the infinite improbability drive?

Logic still works in quantum computers. If you're adding two qubits, you get 4 answers (0 + 0 = 0, 1 + 0 = 1, 0 + 1 = 1, and 1 + 1 = 2). You need to write the algorithm to extract want you want. Quantum computing is quite a bit different than computing. You need to understand quantum mechanics to actually write the "code".

 

[DataBreach]

So, the accusation of fear mongering was on target. It's all about selling those books.

@Rebound59

Stopped reading here because you lost all credibility.

1. I publish all my work for free. There is no "selling" I force people into.

2. I remain anonymous on here. Nothing leads back to me or my work.

Think before you speak next time

 

[DataBreach]

Oh for fucks sake.. Take your tin foil hat off and put down the religious extremism coffee. This right here, is why so few people can take Christians seriously, when we start spouting ignorant stupid bullshit like this. Makes sound as nut worthy as most Islamists.

Tired weak argument. Were you born.on logical fallacy day?

I can't counter what you said, therefore, extremism.