Man explains how quantum computers work / how they exploit parallel universes / will lead to AI

I'd imagine there are still people coming out of those schools as theologians. We probably just don't hear about them, unless u search them out. Although with mit i doubt it since it's just a technology centered school (i think).

U sound like one of these people who put science as your god. You look to it for truth and answers and believe whatever it tells you. While ignoring the multitude of times it's teachings have been proven wrong.

And i don't mean this as an insult or anything so i hope it doesn't come across that way.

Btw I'm not going to debate this because it's pointless. U won't change the way i see the world and i won't change the way u see the world.
MIT stands for Massachusetts Institute of Technology. You won't find as many liberal arts degrees from there.

It's hard not to take what you as insulting. Here's what science is: It's our best approximation of how the universe works based on study, observation, and experimentation. Do we always get it right? No, but it's only through science that you and I are even talking right now. Our understanding of electrons and their multivalent states is how data flows through the internet. So clearly, we've learned a lot along the way. To throw up one's arms and say, "Well, science hasn't answered all the questions yet or been right on everything means that science isn't important," is a really bad argument. Science is a process, and that process is going to eventually give us the answers to how the universe works. Seeking anything outside of science is adherence to mysticism. If God (which I believe in) has created the universe, he did it according to a set of principles. Through reverse engineering, we can discover those principles (like gravity, quantum mechanics, etc), and ultimately lead us to better understanding God.
 
MIT stands for Massachusetts Institute of Technology. You won't find as many liberal arts degrees from there.

It's hard not to take what you as insulting. Here's what science is: It's our best approximation of how the universe works based on study, observation, and experimentation. Do we always get it right? No, but it's only through science that you and I are even talking right now. Our understanding of electrons and their multivalent states is how data flows through the internet. So clearly, we've learned a lot along the way. To throw up one's arms and say, "Well, science hasn't answered all the questions yet or been right on everything means that science isn't important," is a really bad argument. Science is a process, and that process is going to eventually give us the answers to how the universe works. Seeking anything outside of science is adherence to mysticism. If God (which I believe in) has created the universe, he did it according to a set of principles. Through reverse engineering, we can discover those principles (like gravity, quantum mechanics, etc), and ultimately lead us to better understanding God.

Lol yes i know what mit stands for, thats why i said what i said about it.

And im not against science btw. I see it as 1 useful tool. But different problems require different tools. And science, imo, is not and will never be able to answer certain very important questions that human beings have.

The problem i have is with ppl who are of the mind that science is the ONLY thing out there and if u delve into other disciplines then u must be ignorant. Im pretty far from ignorant and it insults my intelligence when ppl adopt that attitude.

I mistakenly lumped u in with the groups of ppl itt that are like that and that's my fault. If u reread your post u can probably see why i thought that. But anyway, no harm done.
 
Lmao you have to admit you got ReKt here. Saying you defended and deterred against an attacker isn't at all the same as challenging someone and then winning

If you want though, you can explain what one was to infer from your "punch/broken wrist" analogy. Your[ noncombative approach to discussion right?

Inference of tone to highlight approach. I don't expect a man claiming god chose him alone to correctly interpret the Bible to get it, but you clearly have a boner for internet fights. So you should be a bit quicker to piece it together.
 
Okay, but the people I listed are concerned that AI will be a lot more than computers processing information. They are afraid the machine will become self aware and it will believe it can do a much better job than mankind and thus decide to weed us out. You explain it is easy to put in hard programming but professionals much more advanced that you or me in this field are still very concerned.

I have been called to Interpret the Bible and to handle sensitive revelation and use it to minister to the Church and witness to the earth.


It's not a personal revelation. The Bible only has one true interpretation and I am very accurate to interpreting it and give it away for free. That "free" part makes me the real deal separate from being the guy who decoded it. I wrote the book in 2013. No one has debunked it yet and no one will.

In short, the Bible has accurately identified all of this end times technology and I have interpreted its revelation in my book for the layman to read and understand. I do this so people will consider it and when what I said in my book happens, they'll need to give credit to where it it due, the Bible.

Because once Jesus returns and judges the earth everyone outside Jerusalem will need to start from scratch. Think Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome.

So basically you proselytize. For free no less. How very gracious and generous of you.

Putting aside all of the prognostications about whether we will be better off or worse off as we explore this area, what are we really talking about here???? Lets distill this thing down to it's lowest common denominator. Once we do that, the argument becomes a simpler one.

At the end of the day, what we are doing is trying to gain knowledge. We are trying to understand things we currently do not. We are trying to learn and evolve. IMO, we should never shy away from trying to gain knowledge, learn and evolve. And wherever that quest takes us, we should be willing to go. And whatever consequence comes as a result, we should be willing to pay.

It does not surprise me that someone of faith is against this pursuit. And it does not surprise me that they would surmise that this vast increase in knowledge would be used for the purpose of total control, as you mentioned below.

You're in for a rude awakening. This technical system was built for one ultimate purpose. Total control.

No civilization or society has ever praised a system that led to total control by those on the top.

This lamentable train of thought has no basis in reality. But many believe it because it goes AAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLL the way back to the very beginning of the Bible. Even according to the Bible, the only reason we know jackety shit is because Adam and Even sinned. God did not want us to have all the knowledge or pursue all the knowledge.

Now, let's bring this forward from basically that moment through the present day. And lets look at AAAAALLLLLLLL the people, governments and entities through all of human history that have tried to exert control on others. Principally, how have they done it? Have they done it by encouraging and enabling people to seek knowledge and understanding? Or have they done it by limiting their ability to seek knowledge?

The less people know, the more they can be controlled.

And this is not just true when it comes to one person trying to control another. It is just as true when it comes to the environment, the world, or the universe controlling us. There was a time, before fire, the wheel, and written language, that the world itself had much more control over men than it does today.

Never, EVER let someone convince you that the seeking of new knowledge is bad. The second we quit seeking new knowledge is the second our species starts to die.
 
Last edited:
why do we have to have 'parallel universes'?
fuck those guys.
we're us, you're you.
deal with it.
pfft

I believe that time is a circular thing. What I did 5 minutes ago is being done again, and so on and so on.

This guy agreed.

 
Yeah, no shit. I know this far better than you. But, when did he say it was cyclical?

Got me on that. That's my own tweek on it.

No need to make me sound dumb.

Generally it would be cyclical as the earth spins.
 
How did they conclude in parallel universes and how exactly are they taking resources from said universes? Sounds like pseudo science.
 
Got me on that. That's my own tweek on it.

No need to make me sound dumb.

Generally it would be cyclical as the earth spins.

I wasn't trying to make you sound dumb, I just didn't want you misrepresenting Einstein. Then others would tell people that Einstein thought time was cyclic. That stuff bothers me on the internet.

What do you mean by cyclical as the earth spins though?
 
How did they conclude in parallel universes and how exactly are they taking resources from said universes? Sounds like pseudo science.

No conclusive evidence, but it's a generally accepted interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. By using Quantum Mechanics, by definition, you are "accessing" parallel universes. But he's just sensationalizing this because the Sun does this every second and so do computers.
 
I wasn't trying to make you sound dumb, I just didn't want you misrepresenting Einstein. Then others would tell people that Einstein thought time was cyclic. That stuff bothers me on the internet.

What do you mean by cyclical as the earth spins though?

Because it is one way and can be bended but it will always go towards the future.

Edit-This has already happened.
 
No conclusive evidence, but it's a generally accepted interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. By using Quantum Mechanics, by definition, you are "accessing" parallel universes. But he's just sensationalizing this because the Sun does this every second and so do computers.

Anything comprehensive I can read on this? Sounds to me like it's just a fun thing they like to say but when you break it down it's nothing of the sort. They make it sound is like they're creating energy.
 
Back
Top