Looters Ransack Ronald McDonald House

[Deleted member 484047]

Fuck those assholes. Thats the one good thing McD does.

Sir, I will NOT have you undervalue the amazingness of their french fries. I demand you amend your statement!

As for the topic at hand, fuck those idiots. Who the hell goes into a RMD House and purposefully causes trouble? You gotta be fucking deranged to think they deserve that.

 

[ultramanhyata]

It's funny how it bothers you in this instance.

Show me a single instance where I have defended any intentionally misleading headline or article, Mr. Pubes. I'll wait.

I've already proven I have integrity on this issue because I am calling out false propaganda that's being used against a group I oppose. In comparison to the shameless defense of objectively fake reporting being mounted by all the tribalist retards in this thread.

 

[Philo-Publius]

Show me a single instance where I have defended any intentionally misleading headline or article, Mr. Pubes. I'll wait.

I've already proven I have integrity on this issue because I am calling out false propaganda that's being used against a group I oppose. In comparison to the shameless defense of objectively fake reporting being mounted by all the tribalist retards in this thread.

Show me an instance of you adamantly criticizing a left-leaning organization for using a misleading headline. I'll wait.

 

[ultramanhyata]

Show me an instance of you adamantly criticizing a left-leaning organization for using a misleading headline.

I have yet to encounter anything as egregious as this Fox News falsehood - that is, an intentional misrepresentation of known facts.

Provide me with a headline from any "left-leaning" media source that you consider materially deceptive and I will happily give you my honest and objective opinion on it.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

They were looters though. They were just looters who weren't successful in their end goal in that particular circumstance.

Let's say they looted places next door or nearby, there still wasn't any ransacking of the McDonald house. Therefore the headline is false and misleading.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

The picture you should have is nurses and toddlers with cancer going into lockdown and hiding the children, who should be resting in preparation of chemo therapy, underneath their beds as a mob smashes windows in the building with hammers. Because that's what happened.

Yep. Too bad the headline used doesn't depict that.

 

[Spounman]

Well these sub-humans can't read or comprehend so they didn't know what they were looting.

 

[Philo-Publius]

I have yet to encounter anything as egregious as this Fox News falsehood - that is, an intentional misrepresentation of known facts.

Provide me with a headline from any "left-leaning" media source that you consider materially deceptive and I will happily give you my honest and objective opinion on it.

Try virtually any headline from CNN or MSNBC about Nicholas Sandmann.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

So the proper title for the artical and the thread would be

"BLM terrorist attack home for sick children. "

Attack is a little vague and can easily be misconstrued. How about this one.

Windows broken out of Ronald McDonald house as neighborhood ransacked by looters

 

[Philo-Publius]

Yep. Too bad the headline used doesn't depict that.

Right. Because lord knows we will dismiss those facts as "click bait" even though we have the cognition to surmise what actually happened is worthy of scorn rather than dismissal.

 

[PalmaSoriano]

Another great victory for the cause......

Racism ends any day now

 

[Philo-Publius]

Well these sub-humans can't read or comprehend so they didn't know what they were looting.

Yes. The looters/vandals are the real victims in all of this.

 

[MoparOrNoCar]

Another great victory for the cause......

Racism ends any day now

I saw a white kid drive a golf cart through a Vietnamese restaurant window downtown a few weeks back and that's when all the ill will I had against innocent black people was lifted. That kid saved me from the racist alt right ideologies I had floating around in my head.

Thanks Aiden.

 

[Philo-Publius]

Attack is a little vague and can easily be misconstrued. How about this one.

Windows broken out of Ronald McDonald house as neighborhood ransacked by looters

How about, the content of what was reported is far more relevant than the verbiage used in the headline in this case? It's not as outrageously misleading as some of the sympathizers here would have us believe.

 

[Philo-Publius]

I guess bothsiderism helps you justify a willingness to spin the lies of your own tribe.

I know. It's such a big stretch in the distinction of the title and what the article states occurred. It's enough to make you want to paint the perpetrators as the real victims of a "big lie."

 

[PalmaSoriano]

I saw a white kid drive a golf cart through a Vietnamese restaurant window downtown a few weeks back and that's when all the ill will I had against innocent black people was lifted. That kid saved me from the racist alt right ideologies I had floating around in my head.

Thanks Aiden.

My “see the light” moment was watching all those hungry folks meet their daily caloric intake of bread at Louis Vuitton, Gucci, Nike, and Omega to name a few. These are artisanal bread companies

 

[Beechwood]

No one in Chicago is going to stop the looting, the politicians there are more likely to give excuses for why it happened. Sad to see the cancer home was attacked but imagine this kind of destruction will continue until new politicians are elected.

 

[asdffdsa]

Unfortunate, but some collateral damage is unavoidable. They just had bad intel. They believed Ronald McDonald lived there. Have you seen how white that dude is? He must be evil.

 

[S Class]

BLM trying to get "reparations" by terrorizing sick kids. Bunch of LOSERS.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Right. Because lord knows we will dismiss those facts as "click bait" even though we have the cognition to surmise what actually happened is worthy of scorn rather than dismissal.

Who's "we"?

When most folks don't read past the headline, it's important to get those right. Otherwise it's spreading misinformation, and it has to be assumed intentional.

How about, the content of what was reported is far more relevant than the verbiage used in the headline in this case? It's not as outrageously misleading as some of the sympathizers here would have us believe.

But it's not. The headline sets the narrative and most won't read the article. Gotta be a fool not to recognize how often people start commenting just based on headlines alone. Sometimes I do it to.