Looters Ransack Ronald McDonald House

[Hadron90]

The language is inaccurate and promotes a substantially misleading mental picture. Don't you think?

The picture you should have is nurses and toddlers with cancer going into lockdown and hiding the children, who should be resting in preparation of chemo therapy, underneath their beds as a mob smashes windows in the building with hammers. Because that's what happened.

 

[ultramanhyata]

All MSM does this, left and right, to push their narratives.

I guess bothsiderism helps you justify a willingness to spin the lies of your own tribe.

 

[ultramanhyata]

That is such a relief. They only terrorized vulnerable children, and their families, and put them in fear of their lives. They didn't actually have a chance to do real physical harm. That makes this whole thing perfectly fine.

Yeah, accurate reporting of criminal incidents is justifying the crime. Fox News lied about the facts because they believe in law and order and victim's rights.

 

[oldshadow]

The title in the article is misleading it appears they didn't loot.

They didn't break into an empty store and steal shit.

They attacked a home for sick kids and their parents. They terrorized sick children , the word terrorized is key.

So the proper title for the artical and the thread would be

"BLM terrorist attack home for sick children. "

Well mods why not make the title fit the correct crime.

 

[KnightTemplar]

No, only an apologist, realizing how stupid their quibbling is over "rioter" or "looter", would try to compare it to the distinction of "murder", in a sad attempt to justify their position.

You are trying so hard to downplay a group rioters terrorizing a sick kids hospital. That's how big of a bag of shit the left has turned you into, candle boy.

Like.

 

[Hard To Tell]

This is what all those celebrities, politicians and athletes taking the knee are showing solidarity with, and is why people are 100% correct to be disgusted by them.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Was Ronald hiding racism in there?

All they had was white mayo for the burgers in there. It was only a matter of time until something like this happened.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Look...I'm more than willing to die on this hill here.

I think it's absolutely stupid to assume that someone condones what the looters did just 'cause that someone pointed out the article's clickbait title which was obviously put out there to get more eyeballs there to read.

It's amazing that for as long as I've been a Hardcore Trump Supporter here and I've taken the side of @HereticBD on many things that THIS TRIVIAL SHIT (and complaining about me pointing out the Article's title is clickbait *is* Trivial) is what gets people to turn on me? That's fucking ridiculous.

There's still time for you to join the side that will be on the right side of history. C'mon son, join us...

 

[Billthebutcher]

i always knew that damn hamburglar was trouble.

 

[ocfightfan]

These fuckers need to be held accountable and given a year or more in jail for doing this shit. Its getting tiring already and they are fucking up their communities. The mayors and governors need to man up.

 

[ocfightfan]

Yeah, accurate reporting of criminal incidents is justifying the crime. Fox News lied about the facts because they believe in law and order and victim's rights.

Yeah who gives a shit about BLM actually terrorizing cancer kids, we are going to talk about the clickbait news title. After all that's the real crime. Odd that it's not so important when the clickbait fuels anti-Trump/GOP sentiment, but it's the end of the fucking world when it embarrasses the left. And we are still not going to talk about BLM actually terrorizing cancer kids.

 

[Seano]

All they had was white mayo for the burgers in there. It was only a matter of time until something like this happened.

The buns and meat have always been brown. I think thats good enough.

 

[ultramanhyata]

Yeah who gives a shit about BLM actually terrorizing cancer kids, we are going to talk about the clickbait news title. After all that's the real crime. Odd that it's not so important when the clickbait fuels anti-Trump/GOP sentiment, but it's the end of the fucking world when it embarrasses the left. And we are still not going to talk about BLM actually terrorizing cancer kids.

I don't support the BLM movement. As I have stated here multiple times - I think both the movement's diagnosis and proposed remedies for our societal ills are way off the mark. To say nothing of my blanket condemnation of any and all unprovoked violence in the streets.

But I also don't support false propaganda. And calling out propaganda isn't giving cover to a movement I oppose. Whereas for you in trying to deflect away from propaganda you are most definitely giving cover to the promoters of said propaganda.

 

[ocfightfan]

I don't support the BLM movement. As I have stated here multiple times - I think both the movement's diagnosis and proposed remedies for our societal ills are way off the mark. To say nothing of my blanket condemnation of any and all unprovoked violence in the streets.

But I also don't support false propaganda. And calling out propaganda isn't giving cover to a movement I oppose. Whereas for you in trying to deflect away from propaganda you are most definitely giving cover to the promoters of said propaganda.

Nice try.

So you believe that a shitty article title is more important than BLM terrorizing cancer kids, got it. We will focus on the former but not the latter, because we have our priorities straight.

 

[ultramanhyata]

Nice try.

So you believe that a shitty article title is more important than BLM terrorizing cancer kids, got it. We will focus on the former but not the latter, because we have our priorities straight.

Your new propaganda angle is suggesting BLM rioters were somehow specifically targeting a RMH in order to "terrorize" "cancer kids". As opposed to randomly breaking windows in a bunch of buildings within a city block.

Why isn't condemning the property destruction enough? Why do you feel the need to lie and "red meat" up an act of criminality?

I mean, it's almost like you have an agenda or something...

 

[HereticBD]

I mean, it's almost like you have an agenda or something...

Yeah, the "it's reprehensible to terrorize a sick kids hospital" agenda. Guilty. You got us.

 

[Slick_36]

Fucking hell. Did you just do a "both sides are assholes" in a story about looters and 2 year olds with cancer?

I'm denouncing what these people did wholeheartedly. I'm pushing for them to change. Meanwhile you're gungho for a guy selling arms to the Saudis that they then use to bomb and starve Yemeni children.

 

[lifelessheap]

Your new propaganda angle is suggesting BLM rioters were somehow specifically targeting a RMH in order to "terrorize" "cancer kids". As opposed to randomly breaking windows in a bunch of buildings within a city block.

Why isn't condemning the property destruction enough? Why do you feel the need to lie and "red meat" up an act of criminality?

I mean, it's almost like you have an agenda or something...

Excuses! Blahhhhhh... But they didn't know they were terrorizing toddlers dying of cancer! They were simply rioting and terrorizing everything. How were they supposed to know their victims were children with cancer?

BLM are the victims here. Those children with cancer should have never been in a place MARKED and LABELED as a place for children with cancer. Didn't they know peaceful people need to be violent everywhere?

 

[Philo-Publius]

Yeah, accurate reporting of criminal incidents is justifying the crime. Fox News lied about the facts because they believe in law and order and victim's rights.

Referring to the story as "click bait," without denouncing the reprehensible crime, is 100% dismissing the crime. Several people in here did that. It wasn't a "Fox News" story. It was a story from a local Fox subsidiary. The story didn't "misreport the facts" in the article itself. It used a word in the title that was misleading (something CNN and MSNBC do with regularity). It's funny how it bothers you in this instance.

 

[Philo-Publius]

Your new propaganda angle is suggesting BLM rioters were somehow specifically targeting a RMH in order to "terrorize" "cancer kids". As opposed to randomly breaking windows in a bunch of buildings within a city block.

Why isn't condemning the property destruction enough? Why do you feel the need to lie and "red meat" up an act of criminality?

I mean, it's almost like you have an agenda or something...

I see. So, the vandals/rioters/looters are the victims here. You're suggesting they were innocently trying to destroy/loot private property in "protest," and didn't realize they were terrorizing sick children and their families. I feel bad for those shit bag "social justice warriors" already.