Although I agree in principle that's what fighters should be working for, that's just wrong. Control is effective grappling, so it is a primary scoring factor.control is not offense unless it leads to offense.
Nothing, but see sig.
Effective grappling leads to striking and or dangerous sub attempts. That's literally all that distinguishes it as effective and not stalling. This is MMA, not collegiate wrestling.Although I agree in principle that's what fighters should be working for, that's just wrong. Control is effective grappling, so it is a primary scoring factor.
Not a robbery either way, but Nelson has a better than fine case for a win.
If you're in a fight with someone who's going to knock you out the second you stop hugging them, you're not in control! lmfao.Neither guys mounted any significant offence. But Roy controlled the entire fight. Imo he won handily.
If you're in a fight with someone who's going to knock you out the second you stop hugging them, you're not in control! lmfao.
It's a mixed martial arts bout with scoring criteria and rules, not a street fight where rules literally don't apply.If you're in a fight with someone who's going to knock you out the second you stop hugging them, you're not in control! lmfao.
It really is!And that’s saying quite a lot…
Scoring criteria based on attacking your opponent, not "controlling" them. Like I said, this is not collegiate wrestling.It's a mixed martial arts bout with scoring criteria and rules, not a street fight where rules literally don't apply.
Then why did Lewis win?It mostly just sounds like you're upset due to your lack of understanding MMA scoring criteria.