- Joined
- Aug 13, 2010
- Messages
- 19,259
- Reaction score
- 9,065
I think he was sincere GIVEN the conditions.I'm not saying they are the same. But both are changing a resolute stance in order to agree with the opposite party. If you want to give Leon shit for it, one can simply apply the term that implies a loss or being a loser, to the subject. Perhaps out of a dislike for Leon.
Whether Leon really has lost here, depends on whether this was really a matter of principle for him, or just a matter of in the moment emotion, or if he faked the concern and opposal (but personally, I really don't think he was faking).
Like if my boss were to tell me "next I want you to come clean out my garage" I'd have a SINCERE refusal, flat out. But if he then told me "ok, you don't want to, fine. But if you change your mind I'll pay you $30k for 2 days' work" then I'd accept EAGERLY.
Yes, my stance changed, but I did NOT cave. I didn't lose, I didn't lose face, I'm not regretful or embarrassed about my choice - I did what made sense for my pocketbook.
So I'm only saying his agreement is probably a huge win and windfall for him. If his detractors want to laugh about him doubling or tripling his regular pay, they should laugh away. But they're laughing at a man who's making winning decisions.
So I just don't see it as anything to laugh about when a man negotiates his way into some more cash. But, hey, I'm not a hater, lol. I get that some others will laugh. While they make their normal salary or pay and he makes double or triple his. It takes all kinds.