• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Elections Leftists, you need to bend the knee on Transgender Athletes. The future of the Democrat Party depends on it.

now we are getting somewhere, piercing through the wall of fog.

Why, in your opinion, so explain in your own words, are people with birth defects that affect their reproductive organs different than those that have birth defects in other physical aspects, besides your cult telling you to support one and not the other?
You’re trying to shove this into a box it doesn’t belong in. Birth defects affecting limbs, eyes, or other traits are individual impairments they don’t exist as part of a recognized biological spectrum. Sex, however, does. Intersex conditions and other variations happen within the framework of biological sex, not as malfunctions but as naturally occurring differences. That’s the distinction you keep dodging. You’re forcing a false comparison because acknowledging this complexity would unravel your argument, and you know it. If you actually believed in the strength of your position, you wouldn’t have to rely on bad analogies and rhetorical theatrics to defend it.
 
You’re trying to shove this into a box it doesn’t belong in. Birth defects affecting limbs, eyes, or other traits are individual impairments they don’t exist as part of a recognized biological spectrum. Sex, however, does. Intersex conditions and other variations happen within the framework of biological sex, not as malfunctions but as naturally occurring differences. That’s the distinction you keep dodging. You’re forcing a false comparison because acknowledging this complexity would unravel your argument, and you know it. If you actually believed in the strength of your position, you wouldn’t have to rely on bad analogies and rhetorical theatrics to defend it.

If being "intersex" doesn't change your biological functions, it doesn't matter because you still function as either male or female and that's what you are.
If it does, it is a birth defect and the same as any other.

See how simple these things are? You are confusing your tired, tiny mind with this propaganda and ignoring very basic realities. You need, and I don't say this as a meme, to touch grass. Nobody gets as wacky as you without being in a self-imposed bubble filled only with like-minded morons.
 
It's because of things like this that Trump was elected.

Hey, god bless the morons on the left. I hate left-wing ideology from the start, so if they want to tie in their retarded economic principles with unpopular nonsense, that only keeps them as impotent as the delusional people they worship.
 
If your logic were consistent, you’d be banning every natural outlier from competition

Natural

Natural

Natural



You think men and women exist in two neat, separate little groups? That’s not just wrong. it’s lazy as fuck.

Are you advocating for one open division instead of separate male and female divisions? Because I am all for that rofl.
 
Do leftists even remember what reproductive organs are actually for? I think that’s a big problem with them.
 
Natural

Natural

Natural





Are you advocating for one open division instead of separate male and female divisions? Because I am all for that rofl.
He doesn’t realize it, but yes, he was. He’s flailing and it is hilarious. I’ve never seen someone dig so deep to not give up on a position so inherently stupid.
 
Being male means overwhelming physical advantages, more significant than any PED an athlete could take, that don't disappear just because the person feels like a different gender. Where's the concern for the female athletes NOT being given an equal playing field. The idea that their stance is about "equality" is just a comforting little narrative that exists nowhere except in their own head. It makes them feel superior and more virtuous than other people. They claim they're empathetic. That's not empathy, it's ego.
I think they actually believe it though. It's why they can rationalize everything the left does. They truly believe they are instituting a utopia of equality.
 
Everyone automatically equal is not an accurate description. I won't comment further on that.

I have explained elsewhere earlier today, and sometime in the past on this forum, that the issue of trans athletes in sports is a disgusting strawman* intended to conflate the (perhaps reasonable, and undoubtedly rather common) concern, with tarring trans people in general as some kind of threat to humanity. Trans people are individuals and should be treated like it, just like anyone from any group would want. They aren't some hive mind trying to degrade the planet by their existence. Ironically, it's fucking dumb and obvious scapegoating by the type of people who always go after scapegoats.



*All the attention being paid to the rather subtle issue of transgender people in sports (are there even so much as ten in all of professional/international sport?) by a bunch of people who aren't in the medical profession or in sport professionally) is to blow it out of proportion; the people pushing it have been quite successful. It's nauseating. Several people in the Trump administration have accusations of sexual assault on minors against them but it's trans people that are the big threat to kids to these pathetic morons.
Don't you think it's a serious concern though that trans people would be forced to compete in the wrong category just because of what they were assigned at birth? Protecting them from being tarred by Trumpers is important sure, all deserve not to be tarred as such, but we can't have a certain category simply having to "know their place" and have to compete in the wrong category, a modern day public humiliation of a human being because they are a second class citizen because of how they were born.
 
I'm all for lgbtq rights, such as marriage and discrimination protections, but it just doesn't make any sense to have biologically male people competing against biological females. Also parents are the ones who have the right to talk with their children about biology and sexual development.

I talked to my best friend before the election and was shocked he was considering voting for Trump. I'm pretty sure I talked him out of it but schools telling kids they have a safe space to talk about their sexuality and that their parents would be kept out of the loop was his main reason. I told him I didn't think that occurred but that's the policy at the school his son works.

I still think gestation, the physiological development of a human, is far too complex to fit into a box that you can label "male/female" to appease religious beliefs or it's called mental illness. You have to be fair all around though, and especially for someone that went through puberty with testicles, competing against women is unethical.
Isn't sports full of people with genetic advantages anyways? I agree biology is generally too complex to fit into 2 boxes, but isn't that exactly why we shouldn't be upholding a rigid gender dichotomy in sports?
 
Bruh..... it has been an absolute dumpster fire from day one.
America went from the conscience of the planet to an abject joke in three short months.
America went from a smoking hot economy and stock market to a freefall.

If you don't how dire the situation is atm, I just don't think you are capable of rational thought.
That’s American exceptionalism for you. The belief that it can’t happen here and will never happen here. Also doesn’t help that most world war 2 vets are dead and those who experienced the Great Depression are dead. We’ve become too complacent and take what we have for granted
The key word of this post is 'barely.'
There are so many presidential nominees talk about that any one single issue could be said they 'barely' talk about, but its actually quite interesting she didn't talk about trans-issues more... because it was obviously divisive toward the greater voting population.

It didn't poll well.

In fact it polled so badly, that's why the Trump campaign made a campaign ad out of an answer she gave in an old interview from her first attempt to run for the Democrat Nomination in 2019 about trans-prisoners getting taxpayer-funded sex changes.

So its not about what she said or didn't... in 2024... it was about what she said in 2019, and she never bothered to address it in 2024. She chose to disdirect about the subject when she was asked about it by Brett Baier in her Fox News interview.

In other words, Democrat candidates should strongly consider avoiding the subject at all costs or it may bite then in the ass, if not sooner than later.
This post on X kind of sums up what I’m getting at. Right wingers have a tendency to exaggerate how widespread these issues are. I don’t see how the left can fix this when the right can just use social media and its major news networks to scream about trans people constantly. If the dems defend it they alienate people some independents but if they throw trans people under the bus then they also risk alienation some of their own base. The best course of action is to take the Bernie approach and speak to all Americans and actually believe in something and fight for it. Here’s the post from X that I mentioned earlier. As you can see the right wing crowd doesn’t actually like to talk about numbers because they’re way smaller than they want them to be.
 
You joke but two woke dummies actually thought that obvious satire was a serious reply and actually gave you a like.

{<jordan}
Seriously though I think both right and left need to think about the fundamentals at play here. The analysis is too surface level from both sides.
 
Intersex people, just like cis men and women, have varying fertility levels. Some can reproduce, some can’t, just like plenty of non intersex people. But you don’t seem to have an issue with infertile cis people, do you? You’re not out here calling them defective or questioning whether they count as real men or women. You only pull this bullshit when it involves intersex or trans people. That’s not science, that’s just transparent, lazy-ass cherry-picking.

Screenshot_20250310_074118.jpg
 
Isn't sports full of people with genetic advantages anyways? I agree biology is generally too complex to fit into 2 boxes, but isn't that exactly why we shouldn't be upholding a rigid gender dichotomy in sports?
Yeah but testicles are a pretty big genetic advantage. I think as far as sports are concerned you've either had them or not.
 
yes-wwe.gif

Don't let the issue die.
Keep it going, promote it, and never stop until every state is bigot-free!


View attachment 1085502

That will change. The democrats once oposed the ban on slavery but 100s of years later they championed civilrights movement and destroyed statues if slavers
 
Don't you think it's a serious concern though that trans people would be forced to compete in the wrong category just because of what they were assigned at birth? Protecting them from being tarred by Trumpers is important sure, all deserve not to be tarred as such, but we can't have a certain category simply having to "know their place" and have to compete in the wrong category, a modern day public humiliation of a human being because they are a second class citizen because of how they were born.
Edit: I think the way this is being discussed by people for whom it has absolutely no impact is the most serious concern.
 
There is no value letting any born male physically compete with a female genetically, transgenders will also take advantage of this for financial reasons . It makes as much sense as the female who became a male and got hurt bad in boxing because she thought adding muscles would make her equally strong as a man….ooops .


The entire thing is ridiculous.
The value is in treating people equally and leveling the playing field for those who are less fortunate.
 
Back
Top