Social Kyle Rittenhouse updates

But these people aren't being arresetd for protesting, they are being arrested for breaking the law. And for very serious felonies in some cases. Like your :eek::eek::eek::eek: Antifa comrade who stabbed someone and got his bail paid. Just because they use the word 'protest' in the title and synopsis doesn't make it true. It is clearly a disingenuous use of the word.
MLK Jr would be fuming at the way these ''protestors'' are going about things. The left has been pushing out propaganda that Trump is making everyone racist and they're falling for it hook line and sinker.
 
I’m not weighing in on either side might I add. I just don’t see from a legal point of view him “walking”.

what we don’t see is what started it all. I’d like to see that evidence before making a judgement on this one.
He put out a fire started by the rioters that's why the first group Chased him
 
Personally i don't give a flying fuck whether this 17 year old was or was not defending himself. I don't want to live in a State/Country where a child, because that's what a 17 year old is, gets to walk around with an automatic weapon strapped to their person. If i wanted that i'd move to Honduras or the Democratic Republic of Congo.Do the freepers who're cheering this shit on know how much of a slippery slope it is? Or do they simply not care?

We do NOT wan't to go down this route folks. It's a one way ticket to third worldville.

Don't insult third worlders.

17-year-olds with rifles strapped on out on the streets are universally condemned in Honduras and the DRC. Only in the US does half its population cheerfully support it.
 
And what is a 17 year child doing driving to another state to "help protect a business" with a gun that he is not old enough to have?

I'm not saying his heart wasn't in the right place, but somebody with a fucking developed pre-frontal cortex should have told him to stay put an let the police do their job.

He could have gone and helped clean up graffiti next week if that's what he wanted to do. The last thing our country needs right now is vigilante mobs out clashing with rioters in the streets-- especially if those people are children.

All if that can be true, and it still has nothing to do with the fact that protesters were trying to kill him and he was defending himself. What the country really doesn’t need, are the protesters continuing to murder and loot major cities. You guys keep saying Rittenhouse went down there looking for trouble, but say nothing about the trouble that’s there to find.
 
Read the whole post again and tell me where I draw a direct analogy. Done? Ok. It’s not an analogy. It’s a demonstration of a situation where a self defense claim most likely wouldn’t fly because of the circumstances leading up to the attack. In case you didn’t read that part either, I’ll say it again: we don’t know the exact circumstances yet.

Well usually it’s innocent until proven guilty and all we’ve seen so far is the guy trying to avoid direct confrontation by running away, but since this guy didn’t loot or riot you don’t really care about facts and are ready to compare him to somebody going to Compton with “i hate Blacks” t shit...

now what’s funny is if a black guy went to some southern city with a “I hate whites” and he was attacked by couple of white guys and shot them in self defence you’ll be here screeching about 1st amendement and freedom of speech.

So again you’re full of crap
 
Don't insult third worlders.

17-year-olds with rifles strapped on out on the streets are universally condemned in Honduras and the DRC. Only in the US does half its population cheerfully support it.

And of course their crime rates are so low as the result of it...
 
You were using your imagination earlier. What potential fact would make the known facts no longer add up to self-defense? Because whatever was said between the two earlier won't change the fact Kyle, based on running away, had established his right to defend himself with force.
Feels pointless to go through literally millions of possible combinations of events. But sure, he could have been antagonistic to the point of being violent and ran away after punching the guy in the nuts. Like I said earlier, I’m not sure how it works under US law, but I doubt you can fatally shoot someone in response to getting punched in the face and call it self defense. But like I said, I dont know what exactly transpired here, not sure why that’s so controversial for you.
 
Feels pointless to go through literally millions of possible combinations of events. But sure, he could have been antagonistic to the point of being violent and ran away after punching the guy in the nuts. Like I said earlier, I’m not sure how it works under US law, but I doubt you can fatally shoot someone in response to getting punched in the face and call it self defense. But like I said, I dont know what exactly transpired here, not sure why that’s so controversial for you.

The inciting incident appears to have been Kyle putting out a fire.
 
If he wanted to protect himself he would have stayed home. We both know this. He went there strapped and ready to rumble.

Having armed militia running around is some third world Somalia shit.

Would you rather the building was looted and no one was shot or is what happend preferable outcome to you?

if she didn’t wanna get raped she should’ve stayed home...

she went there dressed the way she was ready to bang....
 
Well he didn't. He wanted to help people. And it's pretty low character to shit all over him for that. Don't ever accuse someone else of blaming the victim, because that's exactly what you're doing.

Having the NG roaming around is 3rd world shit too. But thanks to the leftists in America encouraging all these "peaceful protests", good people are being forced to defend their communities. How many threads here have you been in condemning the people who are causing the chaos?
Secondary problems are easier to bitch about then tackling the source issues.

Of course police misconduct is the actual primary issue, but we'll just ignore that steps are being taken to remedy a problem that's been blown out of proportion by the media.
 
Re-read this shit.

I dare you to make less sense.

Not surprised at all you don't understand.

Do you wish the 17 had stayed home or are you pleased with what happened?

BTW have you been, where do we have you stationed now?
 
Well usually it’s innocent until proven guilty and all we’ve seen so far is the guy trying to avoid direct confrontation by running away, but since this guy didn’t loot or riot you don’t really care about facts and are ready to compare him to somebody going to Compton with “i hate Blacks” t shit...

now what’s funny is if a black guy went to some southern city with a “I hate whites” and he was attacked by couple of white guys and shot them in self defence you’ll be here screeching about 1st amendement and freedom of speech.

So again you’re full of crap
Let me know once you’re done with the strawmen and maybe we can pick this back up.
 
Not surprised at all you don't understand.

Do you wish the 17 had stayed home or are you pleased with what happened?

BTW have you been, where do we have you stationed now?

No, I mean your English is so fucked up nobody could read what the hell you saying. Re-read that shit. Fuck, dude - I drunk post all the time but this garbage was unreadable. I was like, WTF is he saying here...
 
If you go to Youtube and check for Donut Operator (channel) you'll get a bit more facts about the guys who got shot and a lot of details about the actual incident. It's clear that the kid was defending himself.
His shooting breakdowns are on point.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top