- Joined
- Mar 20, 2014
- Messages
- 11,552
- Reaction score
- 3,181
First, it's not your analogy. It's been all over the right wing sphere in the last 48 hours. Second, the reason it doesn't work has nothing to do with assumptions, it has to do with the fact that a date and a riot are fundamentally different scenarios.Let me remind you how our interaction started here
you came at me telling me my analogy wasn’t good cause one was “reasonable to assume” and the other “wasn’t reasonable to assume”
I'm not telling you how to think, I'm just pointing out the analogy is wrong because it rests upon a false equivalence.so it’s not me telling you how to think. It’s you telling me.
...never said it was analogous to what happened here. I already re-explained to you that the purpose of that little story was to demonstrate a case in which a claim for self defense would be flawed. This is the third time i'm explaining it.Then you had your own analogy where having a gun is same as going to a predominantly black neighborhood with a hate slogan.
Keywords being "evidence we have so far....". I'll leave it at that.now the evidence we have so far (him running away, firing only once on the ground while attacked by the mob and stop shooting once he was up and no longer in any perceived danger) suggests it was self defence, which make your argument about his “intent” pointless.
"Exclusively"? C'mon dude. To suggest that the counterpart of the extreme left isn't just as hostile to opposing viewpoints is just partisan blindness or willful ignorance, maybe both, but in either case, it's complete bullshit.Now it’s also funny you talk about 2000s GWB “you’re either with us or against us” ultimatum
Let me remind you it’s 2020 and that type of attitude is exclusively on “tolerant left” side
First, it's not your analogy. It's been all over the right wing sphere in the last 48 hours. Second, the reason it doesn't work has nothing to do with assumptions, it has to do with the fact that a date and a riot are fundamentally different scenarios.
I'm not telling you how to think, I'm just pointing out the analogy is wrong because it rests upon a false equivalence.
...never said it was analogous to what happened here. I already re-explained to you that the purpose of that little story was to demonstrate a case in which a claim for self defense would be flawed. This is the third time i'm explaining it.
Keywords being "evidence we have so far....". I'll leave it at that.
"Exclusively"? C'mon dude. To suggest that the counterpart of the extreme left isn't just as hostile to opposing viewpoints is just partisan blindness or willful ignorance, maybe both, but in either case, it's complete bullshit.
Lol Past actions don't matter to me.now the video of the kid hitting a girl is starting to turn up everywhere. all of a sudden past actions matter. but they didn't when the people he killed were raping kids or whats his face that got shot by the cop had sexual assault charges. my lord, both sides are so pathetic
raping kids?now the video of the kid hitting a girl is starting to turn up everywhere. all of a sudden past actions matter. but they didn't when the people he killed were raping kids or whats his face that got shot by the cop had sexual assault charges. my lord, both sides are so pathetic
Right wingers have the best heroes
raping kids?
so you have a source for that claim?
something more than a simple charge with no context??
So, a 17 year old kid who defended himself against serious bodily harm and/or death is not able to have any accounts maintained for him on these donation based sites. The reason given by go fund me was that they prohibit any fundraising for suspects of violence or hate. However, Jared Blake is now a millionaire thanks to go fund me. He is a violent criminal and was wanted on warrants for sexual assault and domestic violence. Seems fair.
https://meaww.com/amp/go-fund-me-sh...an-crowdfunding-kenosha-shooter-illinois-teen
Right wingers have the best heroes
There is their hero now beating up on girls.
Girls? Plural? Get your eyes checked and watch the video again. Two girls start fighting and he joins in to defend one of them. We have no idea how it all started.
Now, seeing as you care so much about the people's histories, let's talk about George Floyd's & Jacob Blake's history, shall we?
Some consistency would be nice but I wouldn’t expect that here.now the video of the kid hitting a girl is starting to turn up everywhere. all of a sudden past actions matter. but they didn't when the people he killed were raping kids or whats his face that got shot by the cop had sexual assault charges. my lord, both sides are so pathetic
You’ll defend any piece of garbage as long as theyre white. We all know your stance on things
You’ll defend any piece of garbage as long as theyre white. We all know your stance on things



Generally bad to hit a girl but those antifa dumbasses were still killed in self-defense. Prove otherwise.
Is that the best you've got?
![]()