Elections Kari Lake pulling ahead

[Saye_mc]

No, I believe in empirical evidence presented in court. Not my own bias, unlike you. Go ahead, present your findings in a court of law and if a verdict is reached, I will act according to the verdict.

Fair but I do have to question your ability to analyze empirical evidence. In the other thread you seem to form the conclusion that Donald Trump was attempting to attack a political opponent. However the transcript of the call mentions Hunters name and not Joe.

Hunter is not a political opponent. His name was mentioned because he sat on the board of an international crime ring.

So how is that attacking a potential political rival?

Do you have any empirical evidence that Donald Trump's only motivation was that of political expediency?

 

[CatchnShoot]

Good news!! The judge didn't throw out all of Lake's lawsuits, just 8 of 10 counts.

God damn MAGA do law good.

 

[Super_Nintendo]

You keep operating on this made up scenario where Kari Lake "technically wins"... where did you pull that from?

I'm saying if. She obviously has enough evidence to pursue a case, we'll see how it turns out.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

Kari Lake Election Trial Marred With Embarrassing Mishaps

Former Republican Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake's election trial was filled with some mishaps on Wednesday as she continues to claim that the 2022 election in the state was stolen from her.

One video shared on social media shows an awkward interaction between Lake's lawyer Bryan Blehm and Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson as the two discuss a voicemail recording and if it was disclosed to the court prior. During the discussion, the judge tells Blehm that he was informed the recording was not uploaded to the court and the defendants can be heard saying that they have not heard the recording either.

"The judge asks if the voicemail has been disclosed or authenticated. Defendants' attorneys say it has not. Lake's attorney, Bryan Blehm, is confident it was disclosed, but can't find the document proving so because this 'last week has been like four months,'" the Democracy Docket wrote in a series of tweets regarding the trial. "Court officials confirm that Lake's attorney did not upload the voicemail recording to the court as evidence. Defendants further state that there's no record of anyone named "Betty" who works for Maricopa County's election department."



Another video shared on social media shows a discussion between Maricopa County Attorney Tom Liddy and one of Lake's witnesses Clay Parikh, where the latter claimed that dozens of ballots were printed in the wrong size. However, Parikh later said that if the ballots are "duplicated correctly and they're configured correctly," they would be counted.

At another point during the trial, there was confusion among Lake's team in regard to a specific witness they wanted to call to the stand. The defendant's legal team can be heard saying that the specific witness was taken off a list to appear during the trial.



Neama Rahmani, former federal prosecutor and the president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told Newsweek on Wednesday that "Lake's lawsuit was frivolous on its face, and I'm surprised the judge didn't dismiss it entirely when he dismissed 8 of the 10 claims."

"With respect to the remaining claims, Lake didn't present any evidence that Maricopa County employees intentionally interfered with election day printers, nor that they violated the ballot chain of custody," Rahmani told Newsweek, adding that Lake's team will need to provide more conclusive evidence of "intentional wrongdoing" to overturn the results.

Carole Lieberman, forensic psychiatrist and trial expert witness, told Newsweek that "The judge has given Kari Lake a high bar to reach - having to prove that any errors in the voting were done on purpose, not just by accident."

https://www.newsweek.com/kari-lake-election-trial-marred-embarrassing-mishaps-1768900

nice to see things are going well for kari lake and her clown crew. she's gonna knock this one out of the park i'm sure. its not a nothingburger. its still real to me dammit!

 

[idrankyourbeer]

I'm saying if. She obviously has enough evidence to pursue a case, we'll see how it turns out.

obviously. she still hasnt presented any evidence supporting her claims. she's got one more day though! the crackhead pillow guy is going to be working around the clock!

i find it funny that you maga cretins like to talk about evidence as if you ever gave a damn about it. evidence is brought to a courtroom. not to the parking lot of a landscaping store across the street from the dildo shop. not once was any allegations of fraud ever made, or any evidence brought to court, that didnt stop you losers from believing in your stolen election fantasies and fairy tales. now all of a sudden you care about evidence? oh please. in another week youll go back to ignoring the happenings in court, sticking your fingers in your ears, and screeching about more of your stolen election fantasies and fairy tales. don't try to talk about evidence like it means anything to you. you believe in the fucking tooth fairy.

 

[Saye_mc]

Kari Lake Election Trial Marred With Embarrassing Mishaps

Former Republican Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake's election trial was filled with some mishaps on Wednesday as she continues to claim that the 2022 election in the state was stolen from her.

One video shared on social media shows an awkward interaction between Lake's lawyer Bryan Blehm and Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson as the two discuss a voicemail recording and if it was disclosed to the court prior. During the discussion, the judge tells Blehm that he was informed the recording was not uploaded to the court and the defendants can be heard saying that they have not heard the recording either.

"The judge asks if the voicemail has been disclosed or authenticated. Defendants' attorneys say it has not. Lake's attorney, Bryan Blehm, is confident it was disclosed, but can't find the document proving so because this 'last week has been like four months,'" the Democracy Docket wrote in a series of tweets regarding the trial. "Court officials confirm that Lake's attorney did not upload the voicemail recording to the court as evidence. Defendants further state that there's no record of anyone named "Betty" who works for Maricopa County's election department."



Another video shared on social media shows a discussion between Maricopa County Attorney Tom Liddy and one of Lake's witnesses Clay Parikh, where the latter claimed that dozens of ballots were printed in the wrong size. However, Parikh later said that if the ballots are "duplicated correctly and they're configured correctly," they would be counted.

At another point during the trial, there was confusion among Lake's team in regard to a specific witness they wanted to call to the stand. The defendant's legal team can be heard saying that the specific witness was taken off a list to appear during the trial.



Neama Rahmani, former federal prosecutor and the president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told Newsweek on Wednesday that "Lake's lawsuit was frivolous on its face, and I'm surprised the judge didn't dismiss it entirely when he dismissed 8 of the 10 claims."

"With respect to the remaining claims, Lake didn't present any evidence that Maricopa County employees intentionally interfered with election day printers, nor that they violated the ballot chain of custody," Rahmani told Newsweek, adding that Lake's team will need to provide more conclusive evidence of "intentional wrongdoing" to overturn the results.

Carole Lieberman, forensic psychiatrist and trial expert witness, told Newsweek that "The judge has given Kari Lake a high bar to reach - having to prove that any errors in the voting were done on purpose, not just by accident."

https://www.newsweek.com/kari-lake-election-trial-marred-embarrassing-mishaps-1768900

nice to see things are going well for kari lake and her clown crew. she's gonna knock this one out of the park i'm sure. its not a nothingburger. its still real to me dammit!

unlike in 2020 this will be determined in trial. Meaning a judge has given her the right to present her case.

You can not jump to claims of nothing burger until the judge determines that it is.

We will see which side is right. This is a healthy step to the healing of this nation. Either way the coin lands.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

unlike in 2020 this will be determined in trial. Meaning a judge has given her the right to present her case.

You can not jump to claims of nothing burger until the judge determines.

the way its heading its a nothing burger pal. are account bets allowed here? i'd love to be the one to rid you of your 4th account.

this WILL go nowhere, and you maga toddlers will continue to throw your tantrums and scream fraud at the sky.

 

[Saye_mc]

the way its heading its a nothing burger pal. are account bets allowed here? i'd love to be the one to rid you of your 4th account.

this WILL go nowhere, and you maga toddlers will continue to throw your tantrums and scream fraud at the sky.

Thanks but I'll have to pass.
You should prepare yourself for the very real possibility that it does go somewhere bud.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

and there was trials during 2020. dont you remember rudy giuliani standing up in front of pennsylvania judge matthew brann, insisting "this is not a fraud case" and then literally talking about mickey mouse and aliens from mars? yeah he got laughed out of the courtroom the very next day.

they are bringing their best alright.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

Thanks but I'll have to pass.
You should prepare yourself for the very real possibility that it does go somewhere bud.

ANY DAY NOW. JUST NOT TODAY!!

boy you chuds are sure setting yourself up for disappointment. whats your sorry ass excuse going to be after katie hobbs takes office? what conspiracy are we going all in on this time? the deep state judges? the weaponized cabal establishment? italian space lasers and hugo chavez were at it again?

you believe in the tooth fairy.

 

[skold]

Fair but I do have to question your ability to analyze empirical evidence. In the other thread you seem to form the conclusion that Donald Trump was attempting to attack a political opponent. However the transcript of the call mentions Hunters name and not Joe.

Hunter is not a political opponent. His name was mentioned because he sat on the board of an international crime ring.

So how is that attacking a potential political rival?

Do you have any empirical evidence that Donald Trump's only motivation was that of political expediency?

I have no idea which thread or post you are referring to, quote me directly and I can clarify.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

Well she has two kids so yes she has proof she got fucked

if i had to lay pipe to this monstrocity, im heading straight back to the bar afterwards. i feel sorry for her husband. i dont know how anybody would be able to put up with her nagging.

i dont know about you guys, but i'd rather stick my dick in a vaccuum cleaner, or even a cheese grater. i know i'd sure as shit be screaming fraud too if i woke up hungover as fuck with that thing laying next to me and no recollection of how it ever got there. mind you if someone was holding a gun to my head and forcing me to pound that out, i would hit it from the back, lean over, and whisper the name "katie hobbs" into her ear, just to see how long i could hold on for.

 

[Super_Nintendo]

if i had to lay pipe to this monstrocity, im heading straight back to the bar afterwards. i feel sorry for her husband. i dont know how anybody would be able to put up with her nagging.

i dont know about you guys, but i'd rather stick my dick in a vaccuum cleaner, or even a cheese grater. i know i'd sure as shit be screaming fraud too if i woke up hungover as fuck with that thing laying next to me and no recollection of how it ever got there. mind you if someone was holding a gun to my head and forcing me to pound that out, i would hit it from the back, lean over, and whisper the name "katie hobbs" into her ear, just to see how long i could hold on for.

Is that real?

 

[cottagecheesefan]

"You didn't prove it was on purpose so it doesn't count"

I agree the judge and/or appeals court will find a way to rule against lake and/or no remedy. However, Lakes team is going for showing it was intentional and I think they have done that thus far.

scott Jarrett the co-elections director said under oath that there is no way there was a 19in ballot image, all were 20in. Only way a 19in ballot image was use is malfeasance. And this printer issue did not happen even once during early voting, only Election Day

then the cyber security and elections expert with decades of experience showed that is just have been intentional because even accidentally clicking a setting like “fit to page” wouldn’t not account for the 19in ballots that were rejected because if a 20in ballot image was fit to page of a 20in ballot page, it would fit the page as 20in not 19in.

same lawyer tried to trap the cyber expert by saying “well if accidentally printed and rejected multiple times, their spoiled ballot goes in a box and duplicated later, correct?” And the expert says his question is invalid because due to his technical analysis it could not be accidental. Was an interesting exchange lol

And they have lots of evidence of the 19in ballot image, including almost 50% of a 100 ballot audit

From game day



And the ballot next to regular ballot from audit



Here is the expert and his exchange with the lawyer, who tried to have this dramatic question posed only to be like “wrong”. Lol. The expert was then rephrased the question after break and clarified the question was invalid because the lawyer asked it as accidental and cited using fit to page. But to the expert it is an invalid question cause a 19in ballot got to page on a 20in page would be the same since dimensions are the same, but the ballots are clearly of a 19in ballot



And to circle back to the lady who said they are invalid votes vs unlawful also had the entire elections Manuel and pointed out where chain of custody is needed and where they need to document totals of ballots between transports to prevent what was mentioned, people inserting ballots. And the county recorder admitted earlier that they did not do that.



they also have employees from the third party at the vote centers even saying they were saying the county wasn’t following chain of custody, but were told to ignore




Edit: another good part but I can find a clip is the same codirector of elections who said absolutely no ballot images other than 20in, he also discussed the county’s estimates for Election Day both high and low. And this did not take into account lake’s team telling their voters to vote on game day

However, Election Day vote totals fell short of even the lower estimate. Which does not make sense since this election has high turnout for a non-presidential year AND one side was pushing for Election Day voting. So that statistically does not make sense and their argument was it implied about 150k voters were suppressed by the long lines and/or their Election Day ballot was not tabulated after being rejected (perhaps getting lost in transport to counting center since ballots that could not be counted at a polling location were taken to a counting center to be duplicated and then counted)

 

[AnGrYcRoW]

I agree the judge and/or appeals court will find a way to rule against lake and/or no remedy. However, Lakes team is going for showing it was intentional and I think they have done that thus far.

scott Jarrett the co-elections director said under oath that there is no way there was a 19in ballot image, all were 20in. Only way a 19in ballot image was use is malfeasance. And this printer issue did not happen even once during early voting, only Election Day

then the cyber security and elections expert with decades of experience showed that is just have been intentional because even accidentally clicking a setting like “fit to page” wouldn’t not account for the 19in ballots that were rejected because if a 20in ballot image was fit to page of a 20in ballot page, it would fit the page as 20in not 19in.

same lawyer tried to trap the cyber expert by saying “well if accidentally printed and rejected multiple times, their spoiled ballot goes in a box and duplicated later, correct?” And the expert says his question is invalid because due to his technical analysis it could not be accidental. Was an interesting exchange lol

And they have lots of evidence of the 19in ballot image, including almost 50% of a 100 ballot audit

From game day



And the ballot next to regular ballot from audit



Here is the expert and his exchange with the lawyer, who tried to have this dramatic question posed only to be like “wrong”. Lol. The expert was then rephrased the question after break and clarified the question was invalid because the lawyer asked it as accidental and cited using fit to page. But to the expert it is an invalid question cause a 19in ballot got to page on a 20in page would be the same since dimensions are the same, but the ballots are clearly of a 19in ballot



And to circle back to the lady who said they are invalid votes vs unlawful also had the entire elections Manuel and pointed out where chain of custody is needed and where they need to document totals of ballots between transports to prevent what was mentioned, people inserting ballots. And the county recorder admitted earlier that they did not do that.



they also have employees from the third party at the vote centers even saying they were saying the county wasn’t following chain of custody, but were told to ignore




Edit: another good part but I can find a clip is the same codirector of elections who said absolutely no ballot images other than 20in, he also discussed the county’s estimates for Election Day both high and low. And this did not take into account lake’s team telling their voters to vote on game day

However, Election Day vote totals fell short of even the lower estimate. Which does not make sense since this election has high turnout for a non-presidential year AND one side was pushing for Election Day voting. So that statistically does not make sense and their argument was it implied about 150k voters were suppressed by the long lines and/or their Election Day ballot was not tabulated after being rejected (perhaps getting lost in transport to counting center since ballots that could not be counted at a polling location were taken to a counting center to be duplicated and then counted)

The first paragraph of your post basically says that if I don't get the result I want it's cause it was rigged .

It's quite the world you've created for yourself.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

I agree the judge and/or appeals court will find a way to rule against lake and/or no remedy. However, Lakes team is going for showing it was intentional and I think they have done that thus far.

scott Jarrett the co-elections director said under oath that there is no way there was a 19in ballot image, all were 20in. Only way a 19in ballot image was use is malfeasance. And this printer issue did not happen even once during early voting, only Election Day

then the cyber security and elections expert with decades of experience showed that is just have been intentional because even accidentally clicking a setting like “fit to page” wouldn’t not account for the 19in ballots that were rejected because if a 20in ballot image was fit to page of a 20in ballot page, it would fit the page as 20in not 19in.

same lawyer tried to trap the cyber expert by saying “well if accidentally printed and rejected multiple times, their spoiled ballot goes in a box and duplicated later, correct?” And the expert says his question is invalid because due to his technical analysis it could not be accidental. Was an interesting exchange lol

And they have lots of evidence of the 19in ballot image, including almost 50% of a 100 ballot audit

From game day



And the ballot next to regular ballot from audit



Here is the expert and his exchange with the lawyer, who tried to have this dramatic question posed only to be like “wrong”. Lol. The expert was then rephrased the question after break and clarified the question was invalid because the lawyer asked it as accidental and cited using fit to page. But to the expert it is an invalid question cause a 19in ballot got to page on a 20in page would be the same since dimensions are the same, but the ballots are clearly of a 19in ballot



And to circle back to the lady who said they are invalid votes vs unlawful also had the entire elections Manuel and pointed out where chain of custody is needed and where they need to document totals of ballots between transports to prevent what was mentioned, people inserting ballots. And the county recorder admitted earlier that they did not do that.



they also have employees from the third party at the vote centers even saying they were saying the county wasn’t following chain of custody, but were told to ignore




Edit: another good part but I can find a clip is the same codirector of elections who said absolutely no ballot images other than 20in, he also discussed the county’s estimates for Election Day both high and low. And this did not take into account lake’s team telling their voters to vote on game day

However, Election Day vote totals fell short of even the lower estimate. Which does not make sense since this election has high turnout for a non-presidential year AND one side was pushing for Election Day voting. So that statistically does not make sense and their argument was it implied about 150k voters were suppressed by the long lines and/or their Election Day ballot was not tabulated after being rejected (perhaps getting lost in transport to counting center since ballots that could not be counted at a polling location were taken to a counting center to be duplicated and then counted)

look at all this chud propaganda. oh boy is this maga muppet ever going to end up disappointed.

this is it!!!

he's still posting tweets from the very same people who have been feeding him bullshit for years. he still hasn't figured it out yet!

 

[idrankyourbeer]

not only does she HAVE to prove intent, she has to prove that it was enough to change the outcome of the election

on her first day she has produced absolutely nothing of substance. she has one more day. they better start unloading that evidence by the truckload, and it better be damning and be able to hold up to scrutiny, otherwise she's finished. its the bottom of the 9th and she's down 105-0 but the cottage cheese chud read a bunch of tweets from his usual bunch and seems to think she's still in it. really she needs a miracle and needs to win the lottery twice over, but in his own world, despite producing nothing of value, she must have made a compelling enough argument to throw away millions of votes and toss out an election!

the writing is on the wall and it has been for quite some time. partisan hacks are the only ones who cant see it. aint nobody gonna throw out democracy for maga trash like kari lake.

 

[AWilder]

not only does she HAVE to prove intent, she has to prove that it was enough to change the outcome of the election

on her first day she has produced absolutely nothing of substance. she has one more day. they better start unloading that evidence by the truckload, and it better be damning and be able to hold up to scrutiny, otherwise she's finished. its the bottom of the 9th and she's down 105-0 but the cottage cheese chud read a bunch of tweets from his usual bunch and seems to think she's still in it. really she needs a miracle and needs to win the lottery twice over, but in his own world, despite producing nothing of value, she must have made a compelling enough argument to throw away millions of votes and toss out an election!

the writing is on the wall and it has been for quite some time. partisan hacks are the only ones who cant see it.

is the evidence coming in TOO fast?

 

[idrankyourbeer]

is the evidence coming in TOO fast?

literally the only argument she made was that they found some ballots on paper that were an inch smaller than they should have been but then they admitted that they all got counted anyways

that was literally it.

its almost like they are treating this like a criminal case when they are on the defensive end, and theyre scrambling to raise doubt. thats not the approach you want to take when youre the one making the allegations. you actually have to prove without a doubt that it actually happened. this is some amateur hour shit right here. marc elias is already laughing his ass off at them and says they have no chance. i'll take his word for it. not only is he representing katie hobbs, but he destroyed diaper don and company in dozens of their lawsuits. he knows the game they are trying to play.

 

[AWilder]

literally the only argument she made was that they found some ballots on paper that were an inch smaller than they should have been but then they admitted that they all got counted anyways

that was literally it.

has the paper been checked for bamboo?