Elections Kamala Harris for POTUS

[I Am Legion]

"She is the worst politician I've ever seen in my life"

"They're gonna try to force her on us, through media propaganda. Kamala, there ain't no media saving in the world that can prop your ass up"

- Kyle Kulinski in 2023

In a friendly environment with no pressure. I swear to you all I hated Hilary like the Trump haters hate Trump. But ii I thought she could fix this mess I would vote for her and just mute the sound on her interviews and read the recaps. I hate her and do not hate Kamala. Nothing to hate. She is nothing. She is about nothing. But I would vote for Hilary over her bc at least Hilary would have a plan.

 

[San Marino]

Kamala Harris finally comes out with her strategy on a variety of issues.

. How to fix the US economy and inflation: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. US southern border and illegal migration: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. Crime: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. Fentanyl crisis: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. Ukraine and Israel: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. Iran and China: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. Supporting Trans, Intersex and Queer Young People: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. Healthcare: Keep Donald Trump from winning.

* There it is in a nutshell. The Harris/Democrat strategy is to keep Trump from wining, other than that, there is no strategy. Who needs one? It will be an after the fact thing if Harris wins. By then America will be fucked beyond repair.

 

[Fedor>Cain]

Kamala Harris finally comes out with her strategy on a variety of issues.

. How to fix the US economy and inflation: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. US southern border and illegal migration: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. Crime: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. Fentanyl crisis: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. Ukraine and Israel: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. Iran and China: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. Supporting Trans, Intersex and Queer Young People: Keep Donald Trump from winning.
. Healthcare: Keep Donald Trump from winning.

* There it is in a nutshell. The Harris/Democrat strategy is to keep Trump from wining, other than that, there is no strategy. Who needs one? It will be an after the fact thing if Harris wins. By then America will be fucked beyond repair.

Pretty goddamn solid plan if we are being honest

 

[San Marino]

Pretty goddamn solid plan if we are being honest.

I am waiting for the Trump/Harris debate disaster.
It will be the 'wake-up call' folks had after the Trump/Biden debate.
After that it will be easy sailing for Trump all the way to November. That is, if no one ties to kill him and the elections are not rigged.

 

[Islam Imamate]

That is if no one ties to kill him and the elections are not rigged.

Do you believe that the 2020 election was rigged or stolen?

 

[San Marino]

Do you believe that the 2020 election was rigged or stolen?

Absolutely.
Dead people voting, people voting multiple times, ballots going missing, no need for ID verification.
How does that make it a legal election? COVID saved Biden.
I know, Liberal Democrats say that it is all a lie. It was a perfectly legitimate election.
If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you. I'll even give you a discount.

 

[Islam Imamate]

Absolutely.
Dead people voting, people voting multiple times, ballots going missing, no need for ID verification.
How does that make it a legal election? COVID saved Biden.
I know, Liberal Democrats say that it is all a lie. It was a perfectly legitimate election.
If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you. I'll even give you a discount.

Just to be clear there was no evidence of outcome determinative voter fraud and here are a list of individuals and institutions who told Trump as much. From the Jack Smith indictment:

a. The Defendant's Vice President—who personally stood to gain by remaining in office as part of the Defendant's ticket and whom the Defendant asked to study fraud allegations—told the Defendant that he had seen no evidence of outcome-determinative fraud.

b. The senior leaders of the Justice Department—appointed by the Defendant and responsible for investigating credible allegations of election crimes—told the Defendant on multiple occasions that various allegations of fraud were unsupported.

c. The Director of National Intelligence—the Defendant's principal advisor on intelligence matters related to national security—disabused the Defendant of the notion that the Intelligence Community's findings regarding foreign interference would change the outcome of the election.

d. The Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ("CISA")—whose existence the Defendant signed into law to protect the nation's cybersecurity infrastructure from attack—joined an official multi-agency statement that there was no evidence any voting system had been compromised and that declared the 2020 election "the mostsecure in American history." Days later, after the CISA Director—whom the Defendant had appointed—announced publicly that election security experts were in agreement that claims of computer-based election fraud were unsubstantiated, the Defendant fired him.

e. Senior White House attorneys—selected by the Defendant to provide him candid advice—informed the Defendant that there was no evidence of outcome-determinative election fraud, and told him that his presidency would end on Inauguration Day in 2021.- 7 -Case 1:23-cr-00257-TSC Document 1 Filed 08/01/23 Page 8 of 45

f. Senior staffers on the Defendant's 2020 re-election campaign ("Defendant's Campaign" or "Campaign")—whose sole mission was the Defendant's reelection—told the Defendant on November 7, 2020, that he had only a five to ten percent chance of prevailing in the election, and that success was contingent on the Defendant winning ongoing vote counts or litigation in Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin. Within a week of that assessment, the Defendant lost in Arizona—meaning he had lost the election.

g. State legislators and officials—many of whom were the Defendant's political allies, had voted for him, and wanted him to be re-elected—repeatedly informed the Defendant that his claims of fraud in their states were unsubstantiated or false and resisted his pressure to act based upon them.

h. State and federal courts—the neutral arbiters responsible for ensuring the fair and even-handed administration of election laws—rejected every outcome-determinative post-election lawsuit filed by the Defendant, his coconspirators, and allies, providing the Defendant real-time notice that his allegations were meritless.

No reasonable and informed person seriously believes the 2020 election was stolen. They're either lying or misinformed, I wonder which one you are.

 

[Limbo Pete]

Absolutely.
Dead people voting, people voting multiple times, ballots going missing, no need for ID verification.
How does that make it a legal election? COVID saved Biden.
I know, Liberal Democrats say that it is all a lie. It was a perfectly legitimate election.
If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you. I'll even give you a discount.

Bro, you're too broke to own even an imaginary bridge

 

[Paynebringer]

I said Harris Walz campaign was going to out spend poorly run RNC "Trump run RNC" on ads on Fox it's not even close. Fox is like show me the money I don't work for free like you're used to Donald. RNC run much like Trumps other failed businesses and FOX knows this fact and are like show me the money first no IOU's this time. FOX be like you already cost us 700 million dollars we need money first. MSNBC and CNN both need money upfront too this is nothing personal it's just business and Donald's team good at running failed businesses.

Do the Republicans have any, Any Democratic converts for Trump on video to convince others to make the turn?

 

[Strychnine]

Absolutely.
Dead people voting, people voting multiple times, ballots going missing, no need for ID verification.
How does that make it a legal election? COVID saved Biden.
I know, Liberal Democrats say that it is all a lie. It was a perfectly legitimate election.
If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you. I'll even give you a discount.

You mean that you have absolute, rock-solid, ironclad, PROOF that the 2020 election was stolen?!?!?

Bro, you can't just sit on it! You gotta go save America, nay! The FREE WORLD with your information!!!!!!


Go! Go! For the sake of FREEDOM!!!!

 

[PEB]

Hulk Hogan for jail he even jokingly threaten Kamala by saying he would body slam her. Even the people who where cheering stop when he made that statement these are die hard MAGA even checking themselves.

 

[Paynebringer]

Absolutely.
Dead people voting, people voting multiple times, ballots going missing, no need for ID verification.
How does that make it a legal election? COVID saved Biden.
I know, Liberal Democrats say that it is all a lie. It was a perfectly legitimate election.
If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you. I'll even give you a discount.

Please, please tell me you have more than these Trump lawyers who argued their "FACTS" in a court of law and not in the Sherdog War room.

 

[PEB]

Beautiful stuff.

 

[Paynebringer]

Kamala in full prosecutor mode closing the case on Donald Trump in her speech on night 4 of the DNC, Guilty!!

 

[SmilinDesperado]

And as a country we are left with 2 horrible candidates because of identity politics and we all lose. We are in trouble right now due to the last 4 years. She is not capable of leading us out. No way. She is hot air. But she will win. An absolute brilliant hand played by the Dems. Brilliant. Kick the old guy out at the last minute when they knew he had no shot. Replace him with a female POC VP, and distance her from the last 4 years. They win, we all lose.

You're wrongly putting this on "identity politics". This isn't about identity, because it isn't really about Kamala, being female, or being a POC. This is fundamentally about what direction you want to see the country go----left or right...Trump, or noT Trump.
Does the identity politics help to motivate people to vote for and against? Sure. But it's not why we're here.

What we're seeing on the right is them getting behind one person, Trump. On the other side, this is more about party. Who was EXCITED to vote Biden? Who is bummed that he is out?
The reality of our politics is that regardless of who the president is, there is a party that is moving or blocking things behind them.
Trump didn't do anything extraordinary as a president. But just him being in office meant he could get some Supreme and federal judges picked, and that helped to structurally change things in favor of Republicans.
However much 'hot air' you think Kamala has, however incapable you think she is, she is being compared to Trump. And it doesn't get worse than a stubborn old man that thinks he has all of the answers and is backed by a bunch of ass kissers.


Do you think the Democrats planned for this to happen? To put Kamala in at the last minute? That they really thought Biden had no shot? That wouldn't of made any sense. Kamala was not the least bit popular, and if that was the plan, they would have been doing some work to make her look better/more likable beforehand.
This also makes Biden look bad, and would make no sense why he would taint his own legacy in this way.

 

[DoctorTaco]

it isn't really about Kamala, being female, or being a POC

For some, perhaps. But for others? They won’t Vote for her bc of these things.

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

Pretty goddamn solid plan if we are being honest

If she is to win i wanna fast forward. First woman pres and most unpopular pres of all time. Lets go.

 

[filthybliss]

What's wrong with having a Trump as leader of the free world.

Just look at his truth social, it’s the train wreck that you’d see on a 4chan thread. and just look at the deluded jerkoffs vicariously living through him on here.

 

[filthybliss]

If she is to win i wanna fast forward. First woman pres and most unpopular pres of all time. Lets go.

Ravi Uncle, is that you? Stick to Bollywood threads, please and thank you.

 

[curryjunkie]

Just to be clear there was no evidence of outcome determinative voter fraud and here are a list of individuals and institutions who told Trump as much. From the Jack Smith indictment:








No reasonable and informed person seriously believes the 2020 election was stolen. They're either lying or misinformed, I wonder which one you are.