Elections Kamala Harris for POTUS

[emefer]

I copied the whole thing top to bottom pal. I think you're confused.


They were never going to endorse Trump. That's not a rebuttal, at all. They would only ever endorse Kamala and nobody would blink an eye if they did. For them to outright refuse to endorse her is a slap in the face that shows how truly terrible of a candidate she is.

No you didn’t. Not in the post of yours I replied to.
You must be confused.

 

[Andy Capp]

I already knew you were wrong, you don't have to retract anything.

EDIT: Andy you might not have understood what I was trying to say- maybe because you thought I was someone else, I don't know.

I wasn't trying to say that Democrats are "bad now somehow" because they like Eminem or ICP or anything. I just think it's hilarious that many people, most of whom happen to be democrats, hated ICP for a long time due to some of their pretty racially insensitive lyrics (as well as Eminem for that matter), now like them. So it's not that they're "bad" because they like anything. It's just that they're inconsistent.

I dunk on republicans too though because they do the same thing. They hate electric cars, overwhelmingly so. They're constantly looking for reasons to reject or defame them. Or at least they did until Elon Musk decided to get involved in politics. Now suddenly it's okay to like electric cars. Cybertrucks are cool now. If Musk were a liberal they'd hate him and them. So I wouldn't think "they're bad" for liking or disliking anything. I think they're inconsistent.

"Many people" and "most of whom..." so how many are we talking about and how many Democrats out of the total? What data do you have to support the assertion that it's a significant number sufficient to label all Democrats as inconsistent? And even so I think people are allowed to change their minds over time, aren't they?

Got any more of these fine nits to pick?

 

[iwannabeadored]

No.
Many were fired by Trump for being incompetent. Something Biden should have tried during the past 4 years.

I mean that’s actually false.

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

 

[WhiteMousse]

"Many people" and "most of whom..." so how many are we talking about and how many Democrats out of the total? What data do you have to support the assertion that it's a significant number sufficient to label all Democrats as inconsistent? And even so I think people are allowed to change their minds over time, aren't they?

Got any more of these fine nits to pick?

Would you agree that a lot of republicans and/or right leaning people detest and boycott EV's because they've been told or otherwise believe that it's a push for environmentalism? You wouldn't have data for that and you wouldn't need to.

I don't claim that it's everyone. And I don't direct my criticism at everyone, just anyone who celebrates ICP's espousal of Harris. In fact that was my precise criticism. You wouldn't have even jumped on me if you hadn't mistaken me for someone else

I'm not trying to accuse you here but the discussion is mutating into something else. I made a response directed precisely at the tweets and people celebrating ICP, a band that hasn't been pertinent in decades (I don't think people changed their minds over time. I think they were completely obsolete, and then gained a small temporary following for endorsing a particular candidate). That's it. The goal of my post was to point out the annoying inconsistency in such things. You're making it out like this is some hill I'm dying on but that's just not true. And again if you hadn't incorrectly identified me as a Trump supporter you probably wouldn't have cared, because it's not a big deal.

Maybe you're thinking then that I shouldn't have made what you consider a big deal out of it. It wasn't intended to be one, I was just expressing my annoyance in a single post. You can probably safely classify that as a nit pick yes.

 

[Cajun]

@Cajun check this out. Now, it's over 13 minutes long and I likely won't watch the whole thing myself even, but the first few minutes ought to give you a good idea where my own thoughts are coming from (independently, that is, not that I ever heard of this guy before today).

He said Trump is paying for polls to make the race look favorable. There are too many polls and too many groups conducting them. I dont agree. Will see but I think that the race will be close. In the 2016 Trump looked like he would lose badly and won. This time its favoring him. Will see..

 

[Andy Capp]

He said Trump is paying for polls to make the race look favorable. There are too many polls and too many groups conducting them. I dont agree. Will see but I think that the race will be close. In the 2016 Trump looked like he would lose badly and won. This time its favoring him. Will see..

Yeah, I don't if he's right about that or not, likely not, but I don't trust the polls in any event. Not long now before we find out.

 

[WhiteMousse]

Yeah, I don't if he's right about that or not, likely not, but I don't trust the polls in any event. Not long now before we find out.

Just want to say you won't see me raving about betting odds either, now that they happen to be favoring Trump.

 

[Andy Capp]

Would you agree that a lot of republicans and/or right leaning people detest and boycott EV's because they've been told or otherwise believe that it's a push for environmentalism? You wouldn't have data for that and you wouldn't need to.

I don't claim that it's everyone. And I don't direct my criticism at everyone, just anyone who celebrates ICP's espousal of Harris. In fact that was my precise criticism. You wouldn't have even jumped on me if you hadn't mistaken me for someone else

I'm not trying to accuse you here but the discussion is mutating into something else. I made a response directed precisely at the tweets and people celebrating ICP, a band that hasn't been pertinent in decades (I don't think people changed their minds over time. I think they were completely obsolete, and then gained a small temporary following for endorsing a particular candidate). That's it. The goal of my post was to point out the annoying inconsistency in such things. You're making it out like this is some hill I'm dying on but that's just not true. And again if you hadn't incorrectly identified me as a Trump supporter you probably wouldn't have cared, because it's not a big deal.

Maybe you're thinking then that I shouldn't have made what you consider a big deal out of it. It wasn't intended to be one, I was just expressing my annoyance in a single post. You can probably safely classify that as a nit pick yes.

All find and dandy but you didn't quote any post in the one I responded to. The comment was on its own with no context. I didn't see whatever posted tweet you're referring to. In isolation it just looked like a poorly thought out attack on the Democrat candidates. So, I'd have reacted negatively to it in any case.

Glad we could sort that out.

 

[I Am Legion]

I do think polls are manipulated but many outlets including CNN are covering that Kamala is stuggling with Latino and Black male voters. Her interviews have been really bad lately and have not adressed the concerns of those groups. She just keeps on with the TDS...."Well he will....well he said...." bitch STFU and tell us what YOU are going to do. How do we lower food prices---"Trump wants generals like Hitler had", How do we fix the border---"Trump is a fascist". They need to hide her for a few weeks.

 

[Scerpi]

He said Trump is paying for polls to make the race look favorable. There are too many polls and too many groups conducting them. I dont agree. Will see but I think that the race will be close. In the 2016 Trump looked like he would lose badly and won. This time its favoring him. Will see..

Agreed... Nothing is certain

And it's far too early.

Even 9PM on Election Day might be too early to make a call

 

[chardog]

unexpectedly good Kamala impression

 

[High Test With da Best]

I do think polls are manipulated but many outlets including CNN are covering that Kamala is stuggling with Latino and Black male voters. Her interviews have been really bad lately and have not adressed the concerns of those groups. She just keeps on with the TDS...."Well he will....well he said...." bitch STFU and tell us what YOU are going to do. How do we lower food prices---"Trump wants generals like Hitler had", How do we fix the border---"Trump is a fascist". They need to hide her for a few weeks.

Acoording to many posters here (who believed the chronic bad press from MSM in the 2016 and 2020 elections were "free publicity" for Trump) Trump's campaign owes her money for in kind campaign donations

 

[Strychnine]

I copied the whole thing top to bottom pal. I think you're confused.


They were never going to endorse Trump. That's not a rebuttal, at all. They would only ever endorse Kamala and nobody would blink an eye if they did. For them to outright refuse to endorse her is a slap in the face that shows how truly terrible of a candidate she is.

Or it shows that a billionaire is using a major piece of media as his own personal plaything.

But a billionaire would NEVER do that...

 

[Strychnine]

So, it begins:
Department of Defense Directive 5240.01.

U.S. Military Just Cleared To Use Lethal Force Against Americans During Upcoming Unrest.​

Far-Right Suggests Military Just Authorized Lethal Force Against Americans Ahead of the Election.​

DOD Authorizes Military Use of Force on Civilians: DOD DIR 5240.01 — Ronald W. Chapman II

DoD Directive 5240.01 and the Department of Defense's expanded authorization for military use of force in response to domestic civil disturbances, including election-related unrest. This directive outlines when and how the military may assist law enforcement, potentially using lethal force under cer

ronaldwchapman.com

If Donold wins, he'd NEVER use the military like that!

 

[Strychnine]

Is that true?
I know Biden/Harris had thousands of children that came through the border illegally unaccounted for. Many sold into human and sex trafficking. Why are illegal immigrants under Biden/Harris getting better treatment than Americans? Food, money, phones, hotel rooms, health care, etc. Legal Americans should come first, but they don't. Homeless veterans, families without food, etc. Why is this radical woke/progressive agenda in place and being paid by the American taxpayer? Biden/Harris have no shame.

Isn't it GREAT that Donold stopped all of that when he was in office...


Oh wait...







To hear those babies cry for their mothers and to hear the agents mocking them is just sickening. But yeah, vote for THAT guy.

 

[PEB]

Trump said the markets would respond favorably as odds improved for a Trump’s Presidency?

"
New YorkCNN —
US stocks took a dive Wednesday as mounting concerns over big tech earnings, rising Treasury yields and political uncertainty drove down all three major indexes.

Investors have been increasingly on edge about the prospect of former President Donald Trump winning the election, a possibility for which Wall Street has been preparing to a greater extent. While polls remain effectively dead-even, Trump’s prospects have grown since the start of this month in political betting markets.

“The logic here is very simple: Candidate Trump has called for a significant increase in import tariffs to revive domestic manufacturing,” Steven Ricchiuto, chief US economist at Mizuho Securities, said in a Wednesday afternoon note. “These tariffs are seen as immediately raising the price of consumer goods and, in the process, reversing the goods deflation that has helped pull inflation back towards the Fed’s 2% target.”
"

 

[White Whale]

Anderson Cooper gives Kamala Harris a bruising CNN town hall

The anchor asked Harris about her support for a border bill that included funding for a wall, which she previously called useless.

www.newsweek.com

Anderson Cooper Gives Kamala Harris a Bruising CNN Town Hall

CNN anchor Anderdon Cooper challenged Vice President Kamala Harris over the Biden administration's record on illegal immigration and her personal attitude toward a border wall during the network's town hall on Wednesday. However some commentators were skeptical of her performance, saying she "focused a lot more on Donald Trump" than her own policies.

Cooper asked Harris to explain her support for a bipartisan immigration deal that included $650 million in spending on a border wall—though she previously "criticized the wall more than 50 times" and labeled a wall "stupid," "useless" and "a medieval vanity project."

Harris responded: "So let's talk about Donald Trump and that border wall. Remember Donald Trump said Mexico would pay for it? Come on, they didn't. How much of that wall did he build? I think the last number I saw is about 2 percent. And then when it came time for him to do a photo op you know where he did it? In the part of the wall that President Obama built."

Harris has taken a harder line on immigration as exclusive polling for Newsweek by Redfield & Wilton Strategies showed 53 percent of Democrat-leaning voters support a stronger approach to the issue.

Philip van Scheltinga, of Redfield & Wilton Strategies, told Newsweek: "When even Democratic voters are overwhelmingly unhappy with the situation as it has developed, then it is time for the Democratic Party to revisit their position."

Cooper asked Harris why she pledged to reintroduce the bipartisan border bill if she won in November, considering her past opposition to a border wall. The Democratic nominee replied, "I'm not afraid of good ideas where they occur."

The CNN host then said, "So you don't think it's stupid anymore?" Harris, referring to Trump, replied, "I think what he did and how he did it did not make much sense because he actually didn't do much of anything."

There was some criticism of Harris' performance after the debate, with CNN host Jake Tapper saying she "focused a lot more on Donald Trump...than she did on many of the specifics in terms of what she would do."

Referring to swing voters, CNN journalist Dana Bash added: "If her goal was to close the deal, [undecided voters] aren't sure she did that."

On X, Washington Post columnist Shadi Hamid said: "At the CNN townhall, Kamala Harris shows herself to be completely unable to address questions about U.S. complicity in Gaza's destruction. She says too many civilians have been killed but refuses to say anything about America's role in the supplying the weapons that kill them."

Democrats realize attacking Donald Trump is not a winning strategy. Kamala Harris is being criticized by the left for her townhall proformamce.

 

[GearSolidMetal]

2 days away from the 1-year anniversary of this headline -

Republicans float a quiet conspiracy theory that Biden won't be on the ballot

The mostly unfounded chatter includes talk that Democrats secretly want to replace him with former first lady Michelle Obama or California Gov. Gavin Newsom.

www.nbcnews.com

Republicans float a quiet conspiracy theory that Biden won't be on the ballot​

The mostly unfounded chatter includes talk that Democrats secretly want to replace him with former first lady Michelle Obama or California Gov. Gavin Newsom.

 

[I Am Legion]

Isn't it GREAT that Donold stopped all of that when he was in office...


Oh wait...







To hear those babies cry for their mothers and to hear the agents mocking them is just sickening. But yeah, vote for THAT guy.

I am fine with hating Trump but this post reeks of hypocrisy...The other "guy" let in WAY more migrants at a clip that WAY more have been smuggled in to trafficking situations. Queens NY has become an indentured servant hooker town FFS. Both parties are guilt here, but the last 4 years have been WAY worse. The thing about Trump putting kids in cages was laughable when a year into Biden's term, the same facilities were used with the same holding cells.

https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=81523b1394659a6bJmltdHM9MTcyOTcyODAwMCZpZ3VpZD0zMDY1MmVmZi1jMGI0LTY4ZjAtMzk4YS0zYzM5YzEyMjY5MDYmaW5zaWQ9NTU0MQ&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=3&fclid=30652eff-c0b4-68f0-398a-3c39c1226906&psq=biden+also+had+migrants+in+cages&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cueW91dHViZS5jb20vd2F0Y2g_dj1fUU03ejdKRk5INA&ntb=1

 

[Sweater of AV]

You think geniuses like yourself just grow on trees and get plucked from the ground, eh Mandy?

It's called "Confirmation Bias" You all consume the same garbage and barf up the same narratives.

It's quite common for someone on YouTube to be entirely full of shit and then find some random misfit on the interwebs such as yourself sharing the same viewpoints.

You are stuck in a processed, pre-programmed hivemind, fully loaded with lots of Trump loathing saccharin. You can't help but gravitate towards it.

This from the idiot who fell for "NYC has never been more dangerous" and had to create a story about a fake aunt to try and save face?



SKYCAN bless.