Do you think the guys were on an even playing field supplement wise?
Definitely. At least the rematch was conclusive enough that you don't see as many threads on it.
I never bought that narrative either. GSP was clearly burnt out by 2013 and I think his performances, along with some serious injuries, reflected that. GSP is innocent until proven guilty. He's 40 years old now and still always looks the same. Just one of those guys with great genes, discipline, and an impeccable work ethic. I guess we will never know, but if you don't fail, you deserve the benefit of the doubt.https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sb...t-pierre-johny-hendricks-drug-testing-gsp-ufc
Good memory. Interesting GSP also pushed for USADA yet GSP haters try and say USADA is why he stayed away for so long at the same time.
That article is an interesting read from both sides though.
GSP has never really been a power puncher.1) There's been talk of GSP lacking power, especially in that fight. Do you buy that?
2) GSP face looked much worse than Hendricks. I heard old scar tissue can cause that. What are your thoughts?
Are you trying to get Sherdoggers a yellow card with this question?3) I thought Hendricks had been popped by USADA, but looking I cant find any records stating he has. Since speculation is illegal, ill ask it this way: Do you think the guys were on an even playing field supplement wise?
I'm not a fan of either of them.Finally, to discern a bit of bias, do you like Hendricks or GSP more?
That's a stupid rule that came from boxing because of corruption from judges. Why didn't that rule apply to BJ/Edgar 1, MM/Cejudo 2, or many other fights where champions lost a close decision?I barely remember it because GSP fights put me to sleep.
As for #5..... Johnny may have won BUT, the old rule of, “You must beat the champ”. applies.
Yoel beat Robert the 2nd time but unfortunately it wasn’t enough to take a belt away.
A fair rule in my opinion.
That's a stupid rule that came from boxing because of corruption from judges. Why didn't that rule apply to BJ/Edgar 1, MM/Cejudo 2, or many other fights where champions lost a close decision?
I barely remember it because GSP fights put me to sleep.
As for #5..... Johnny may have won BUT, the old rule of, “You must beat the champ”. applies.
Yoel beat Robert the 2nd time but unfortunately it wasn’t enough to take a belt away.
A fair rule in my opinion.
But it's NOT a rule, and fights are scored on a round-by-round basis.
View attachment 819014
Orange circle was done by another poster in another thread, but as you can see "you must beat the champ" isn't a rule, and fights arent scored on the whole.
poor kid is still haunted by the fact that GSP is the GOAT, you gotta start feeling bad for your level of delusion eventually.Hendricks retired GSP at the young age of 32
lol ur dumbWhat a coincidence. Your inability to spell out words correctly and improper and grammatical misuse of ellipsis makes me think you may be ignorant as well.
Media scoring for Hendricks: 22
Media scoring for GSP: 3, and that includes one outlet giving him round 4 (lol)
i was there live. too much goes into the booing. most of the crowd thought it was too close to call. most seemed to be pissed that it was a ud instead of split (which doesnnt make sense either, but different crowd at the time iguess) but u also cant really go by that either...To a lesser extent, Machida/Shogun 1 experienced a similar aging shift. I actually have watched it without audio, still think Shogun won. I won't refute the biased commentary though.
I never thought of that but it makes sense. he had some crazy tough weight cuts.
Oh. So most of the crowd was pissed because it was a unanimous decision instead of a split decision? That’s why they were pissed?i was there live. too much goes into the booing. most of the crowd thought it was too close to call. most seemed to be pissed that it was a ud instead of split (which doesnnt make sense either, but different crowd at the time iguess) but u also cant really go by that either...