Media Jonny Walker concussion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 587672
  • Start date Start date
Not only that but isn't it theorized that we only see one side of the moon at all times? I know it sounds conspiracy theory but thats what I've heard theorized.
It’s not theorized, it is a known constant that the moon is tidally locked to earth’s gravitational pull. My God Flerfs, crack a damn 5th grade Science book.
 
No, that's an illusion depending of where it is, on the horizon it makes it look bigger. The apparent size of the moon hardly change even the so called "giant moon" are only like 10% bigger.
Khamzat will never fight again
 
Another interesting coincidence :eek:

Along with orbiting around the Sun at 66,600 mph, the Earth is also rotating at its axis at about 1,070 miles per hour. So you are simultaneously hurtling around the Sun at 66,600 mph while sitting on a rock that is spinning at 1,070 mph.
Things don’t spin in MPH. That 1070 mph is a tangential speed at the equator. You say a lot of words but they are as hollow as your skull.
 
The government hired a Hollywood director to film the "moon landing." Problem is they hired Stanley Kubrick and he's such a demented perfectionist that he flew the actors to the moon so he could film it on location

Things don’t spin in MPH. That 1070 mph is a tangential speed at the equator. You say a lot of words but they are as hollow as your skull.
Had a few interactions before. He's an unapologetic angel-believing flat-earther. You're not gonna get an intelligent thought out of him.
 
Last edited:
The government hired a Hollywood director to film the "moon landing." Problem is they hired Stanley Kubrick and he's such a demented perfectionist that he flew the actors to the moon so he could film it on location


Had a few interactions before. He's an unapologetic angel-believing flat-earther. You're not gonna get an intelligent thought out of him.
This freaking guy!!
 
Actually quite an interesting question though, the moon and the sun looking almost exactly the same size to us with the latter being 400 times larger but also 400 times further away does seem like a stunning coincidence.

<36>
 
Another similar interesting supposedly natural coincidence is if you multiply the degrees in a circle (360) by the days in a year (365) and multiply that number by 1000 (360x365x1000) you get the approximate circumference of the earth in feet. 131,400,000'

LOL. LMAO even.
This is wingdings 9/11 type of bullshit. I don't even know where to begin to explain if you think that is a "coincidence".
 
Google it sir, it's the equivalent to 66,600 mph
I guess nasa has a hollow head aswell?
You can measure only the surface speed in mph ar the great circle (equator) at a specific height (surface level), cuz a different latitude or even a different height at the same latitude (say a mountain vs a valley or anything under the surface) would be moving at different mph, so a spin would normally be measured in RPMs

LOL. LMAO even.
This is wingdings 9/11 type of bullshit. I don't even know where to begin to explain if you think that is a "coincidence".
9/11 bullshit? Comon, think about it. If you add 9 to 11, then divide those 360 degrees by 120 to get 3, then add that to your 9+11, you get
51xTEI-g-kL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg
 
Last edited:
Dude is not afraid to ask the questions nobody else dares to ask!
People answered those questions almost 2000 years ago; the problem is that those answers shit all over Flerfs Biblical misunderstandings so they disregard 2 millennia of Scientific discovery and evidence and replace it with videos from YouTube conmen with the combined brainpower of a hamster on a wheel.
 
Back
Top