- Joined
- Jan 19, 2019
- Messages
- 2,508
- Reaction score
- 6
When I look at a champ like Khabib, I see complete and utter dominance. He makes guys quit in the ring, and makes it look easy. His wrestling is so damn good that I can't see any other lw on the planet beating him, other than with a fluke KO.
Jones, on the other hand, has a significant amount of very close wins.
DC 1 was a slugfest, with neither fighter looking great by the end. DC 2 was a close match up until the KO (hell DC might have even been winning until that point).
OSP fight was unimpressive. Santos fight was very close, and the guys legs were shot. Gus 1 was very close. Gus 2 jones had a great game plan for, so I'll give him that one.
With all these close wins, is Jon overrated / lucky ? He clearly isn't very dominant. Other than Gus 2, I haven't seen him put on a Khabib style one sided beatdown in a while.
Or is all of this on purpose? As he leaves his athletic prime, maybe he has just adopted a much more careful and meticulous style (like Kobe in his 30s), meaning he is content to get the close wins ? Maybe he is just that good and all this is part of the plan?
Which one is it?
Fun fact about Gus 1 that everyone loves to forget...jon jones broke and dislocated his big toe 6 months before that. Most people arent even walking normally after that kind of injury in 6 months, let alone fighting.
The second time around, he had 2 working feet....
Last edited: