Fuck you. Douchebag.
Both were good movies. Maybe your the woke fucker.
Cocksucker
Edit: fucking marvel nuthuggers
Fuck Marvel
The last scene is him literally laughing to himself in the asylum interview room because he just came up with the “joke” of killing the complete stranger sitting across from him just for the fun of it.
Have not seen the new Joker movie yet, but it always bothered me how TDK Joker lost.
I found it somewhat unrealistic that someone on the two boats didn't press the buttons. I guess my view is a bit myopic....seems like I'm gonna enjoy the new movie.
Yes.Was the penguin in it
TDK Joker's motivations are clear, The Joker literally explains why he does what he does, the only thing they don't explain is his past. There's layers that you seem to have missed. Leaving his background a mystery in TDK is intentional, not an oversight. He's written as the ideological opposite of Batman and the line about the world burning is to show Batman that he couldn't handle Joker the way he has others because he doesn't have typical motivations which is what Batman needed to understand because he couldn't figure him out.
You're comparing a character study to a film featuring a fully fledged character, it's like comparing an apple to a grapefruit and saying it's a shitty fruit because it's not tart enough. Or, for a more specific example, complaining that the first Star Wars sucked because we don't know everything about Vader's past.
The problem I have with this Joker is that he's painted as a down on his luck sympathetic character. Any iteration of the Joker I've seen shows him as a highly competent albeit disturbed individual but he isn't even hinted at as highly competent in this movie even after he starts coming into his own, which, no matter how disturbed, that intelligence doesn't simply develop, it should have already been there and we should've seen shades of it. I needed to believe at the end that this was the beginning of a mastermind who could challenge Batman, what I got was a fairly average mentally ill guy who snapped and wanted people to stop being meanie heads to him. That doesn't work for me, especially after the brilliance that was TDK. If it does for you, that's fine, your enjoyment of the movie doesn't hurt my feelers.
Good points. At the very least, I'd expect the Joker, even in his early stages, to be clever and capably manipulative. For me, he's gotta be smart, maybe even well read, have already been involved in street crime, something. Even simple things like showing him performing magic tricks, hustling cards, anything. Plus, as you said, this Joker was way too old, that's a glaring detail.Yes that bothered me as well. By merit of character, the joker of TDK was a good fighter, had weapons and military training as well as guerrilla warfare tactics. This Joker was simply too incompetent from the Ledger Joker. Like different human beings. I was expecting Arthur Fleck to be a prototype of future Joker.
I mean it didn't make any sense! Joker is portrayed as being 5 years older than Bruce Wayne in most depictions if not around the same age. Joaquin Phoenix is like 44 years old and they picked him because they wanted an older guy who was beaten by life by that point. To me he cant be the true joker because he would be too old to rival Bruce Wayne.
If Bruce is a kid and Arthur Fleck is in his mid 40s, then it wont make sense by the time Bruce becomes Batman, Arthur would be in his mid-60s to early 70s. With that, I was expecting the end to revolve around a kid who would become the true Joker. I mean, before Joker was created, we had this dude:
![]()
That being said, the movie was wonderful in a sense that if a real life dude wanted to be a joker then they would be the Arthur Fleck version since Ledger is too unrealistically capable.
Joker is white and a straight male
More than enough to spark an outrage
Just saw it today. Good movie but would only recommend to people very interested in a joker origin story. Anyone else would probably get bored at points in the movie.
I thought the movie should have ended with joker standing on the car
Good points. At the very least, I'd expect the Joker, even in his early stages, to be clever and capably manipulative. For me, he's gotta be smart, maybe even well read, have already been involved in street crime, something. Even simple things like showing him performing magic tricks, hustling cards, anything. Plus, as you said, this Joker was way too old, that's a glaring detail.
I watched a video earlier that theorizes the the Joker in TDK was a combat veteran who was special forces, which perfectly fits the mold for Ledger's Joker.
Arthur Fleck was a fantastic character in his own right, but him being incapable and clumsy made him very much removed from the iconic character of joker. However, I am down to see a sequel with Arthur Fleck and the continuation of his story that revolves around a plot with him saving or inspiring some kid who grows up as a joker that is the true rival and age range of Bruce Wayne. This is something I would love to see.
Nah I don't think it would be that bad. We have pointed this out. I think it would be a 47 year old joker vs a 25 year old Batman. Not a big deal. Especially since joker is more ideologically opposed than physically,opposedThat would be pretty cool. The age thing threw me off a bit. This guy couldn't be joker on that one single factor. He would be over 60 years old by the time batman even arrived.
Good points. At the very least, I'd expect the Joker, even in his early stages, to be clever and capably manipulative. For me, he's gotta be smart, maybe even well read, have already been involved in street crime, something. Even simple things like showing him performing magic tricks, hustling cards, anything. Plus, as you said, this Joker was way too old, that's a glaring detail.
I watched a video earlier that theorizes the the Joker in TDK was a combat veteran who was special forces, which perfectly fits the mold for Ledger's Joker.