Joe Rogan isnt sold on the Bing Bang theory finds Jesus resurrection more plausible

Yes other groups, which are the exact same species… which brings us back to what we were discussing initially, why don’t we do that to other groups of our species?

Because as I’ve pointed out before we are intelligent enough to grasp being belligerent towards all groups can carry consequences we as a species agree are not preferential. Often times, being cordial is more efficient at survival and supporting social structures. I’m it sure how this is over your head.

You keep assuming all creatures would be best suited to survive in nature if they always were trying to kill everything it came across and keep resources for itself and act outside of any group. If you look at nature that’s not the case obviously.

When you attack something you put yourself and the others you depend on at risk, it can provoke us to be attacked back, it can promote violence within the sub groups of our own troop. There isn’t a situation in social creatures where belligerence isn’t without some consequence. You keep making up this made up situation.
 
Because as I’ve pointed out before we are intelligent enough to grasp being belligerent towards all groups can carry consequences we as a species agree are not preferential. Often times, being cordial is more efficient at survival and supporting social structures. I’m it sure how this is over your head.

You keep assuming all creatures would be best suited to survive in nature if they always were trying to kill everything it came across and keep resources for itself and act outside of any group. If you look at nature that’s not the case obviously.

When you attack something you put yourself and the others you depend on at risk, it can provoke us to be attacked back, it can promote violence within the sub groups of our own troop. There isn’t a situation in social creatures where belligerence isn’t without some consequence. You keep making up this made up situation.
Dude you’re all over the place, I already gave you a hypothetical scenario where there was zero consequences for it yet we still know it would be wrong. I told you we are different than the other animals and have a higher purpose, and you came back with chimps being compassionate towards their species which couldn’t be further from the truth. Now you’ve given up on the chimps and you’re back to consequences. For fuck sakes man, I’m asking a simple question, if there was no consequences whatsoever, would you still consider it wrong or not?
 
That still doesn't explain why those laws are in place, if anything is permissible and there is no purpose, then everyone should be free to do what they like.
Free to do what you like doesn’t mean free from consequences. The consequences of raping and pillaging is having your enemies band against you and destroy your society.
Yes there are atheists and agnostics who are still living according to basic Judeo-Christian values whether they realize it or not, it is deeply ingrained in western civilization.
Sure. But that’s because those values help society function on a practical level. It has nothing to do with god nor his commandments. Were that to be true then we’d have to also follow the Judaic law.
My main argument is whether or not there is a creator and a purpose to life vs whether there is no purpose and everything is completely random
People find their own purpose. Myself and all my hethenistic friends find great purpose and meaning in life by serving others. By loving on our friends and family. By celebrating community together. I was a believer, I did time studying scriptures and theology at a small Bible college, I have preached and prayed and studied the wonders of god. When I came to my realization that I couldn’t believe any of it anymore my life didn’t change. I stopped going to church, stopped praying and studying my Bible and literally nothing in my life changed one way or another.
My life is better and more meaningful when I do
That’s great man, and I mean that. Everyone should have a purpose in life and find meaning in their existence. Some folks need God for that, some don’t.
The old watch argument, if I found a perfectly functioning watch on the ground I would have to assume that someone made it rather than it just got put together by random chance with no creator. When I look at the motion of the earth around the sun, and all the cycles we go through, to me it resembles a finely tuned watch and I have a hard time imagining that it's all by random chance without purpose.
The watch makers argument (intelligent design) is a solid one. It’s concise, simple to understand and easy to grasp. It doesn’t hold water for me because of the sheer amount of time we can figure has passed since existence started and what that can mean for statistical anomalies. You partner that with evolution (micro or macro) and you can understand how things can work together in such a cohesive manner despite being born or chaos and random chance.

the book was written by man and my advice is take from it what is useful and discard what is not.
No argument from me. That directly flies in the face of all Christian doctrine on the subject but since I’m not a Christian then it’s what ever
 
Dude you’re all over the place, I already gave you a hypothetical scenario where there was zero consequences for it yet we still know it would be wrong. I told you we are different than the other animals and have a higher purpose, and you came back with chimps being compassionate towards their species which couldn’t be further from the truth. Now you’ve given up on the chimps and you’re back to consequences. For fuck sakes man, I’m asking a simple question, if there was no consequences whatsoever, would you still consider it wrong or not?

Chimps care for each other, provide resources for each other, teach each other, protect each other and choose not inflict violence on those within its social structures that it does inflict on those outside it. Are to dumb to all these preferences of intelligent social animals? This is like pre-k level knowledge how did you not learn about it?

You can’t and haven’t put forth any scenario that occurs in nature where attacking something has no consequences or risk. You admit it’s purely hypothetical. So how can it explain anything about this behavior that develops in reality? It can’t. You’re playing make believe to try save your point.

Just the awareness of another’s suffering reveals the potenial of us experiencing suffering and reveals unfairness which causes suffering in us. If I don’t have cancer but witness many people suffer it it will cause me distress and I’m now aware this or something like it could inflict me at some time
 
I believe it's because we are more emotionally evolved than most other species. We have the capacity for sympathy, and empathy. But I think it's far more tenuous than you'd like to believe. How many times has a group or country full of otherwise good, empathetic human beings turned on their fellow man and killed hundreds, thousands, and even millions of others?

How do you reconcile that? Because from everything I've seen, we are as terrible as we are wonderful. I do not view us as some godly creature, wholly separate from the rest of the animal kingdom. Our capacity for "evil" easily trumps that of any other animal. They hunt for food, and take what they need. We hunt species to extinction, and we do it for fun. If chimps had the intelligence and adaptability to do that, would they? Possibly! After all, that's basically what we are. 💁🏻‍♂️

And as far as your question earlier about why the US doesn't simply conquer everybody else, I would say that we are connected globally, and it would not be on our best interest to do these things and wind up pariahs or worse. That has not stopped other nations from trying.
Bonobos in masks. I've been telling people for years. ;)

Savagery in some fancy cloths!
 
I am not sold on the bada bing bada bang theory either.
 
Yes other groups, which are the exact same species… which brings us back to what we were discussing initially, why don’t we do that to other groups of our species?

Are you trying to argue that humans are unlike other species? We do everything every other species does up to and including cannibalism; and we have greater capacity for everything we do thanks to our intelligence.
 
There is a whole sub-generation of idiots that think Rogan is profound; you would have to live under a log to miss that.

As far as your second paragraph- incredibly ironic statement. I don't even have to respond, you've exposed yourself in doing the very thing you are protesting.
This is the part where you present evidence to back up your claim.

And your second paragraph isn't even ironic, it's just stupid. I outright state no one believes in a man in the sky, and you still take that to mean the opposite?
Not ironic, just retarded.
 
This is the part where you present evidence to back up your claim.

And your second paragraph isn't even ironic, it's just stupid. I outright state no one believes in a man in the sky, and you still take that to mean the opposite?
Not ironic, just retarded.
You think I would waste my time typing a bunch of explanations for a goofball like you? I only have conversations with people that are smart enough to understand them. Does that make you feel better to call people names like an 8 year old? Time to block you kid, one day you will grow into a man and we can have a conversation. Bye now.
 
Hmmm, interesting... it's almost as if we are not like the other animals, and we have some greater purpose.

You don't have to believe in a God, and you certainly don't have to follow any specific religion. But whether you like to admit it or not, and whether you notice it or not, judging by everything you just said (mostly things I completely agree with by the way), you seem to live your life as a good Christian.

I don't think not being a dickhead is just a Christian concept. I'm not religious but I'm not a dickhead to people because I have empathy.
 
Free to do what you like doesn’t mean free from consequences. The consequences of raping and pillaging is having your enemies band against you and destroy your society.

Sure. But that’s because those values help society function on a practical level. It has nothing to do with god nor his commandments. Were that to be true then we’d have to also follow the Judaic law.

People find their own purpose. Myself and all my hethenistic friends find great purpose and meaning in life by serving others. By loving on our friends and family. By celebrating community together. I was a believer, I did time studying scriptures and theology at a small Bible college, I have preached and prayed and studied the wonders of god. When I came to my realization that I couldn’t believe any of it anymore my life didn’t change. I stopped going to church, stopped praying and studying my Bible and literally nothing in my life changed one way or another.

That’s great man, and I mean that. Everyone should have a purpose in life and find meaning in their existence. Some folks need God for that, some don’t.

The watch makers argument (intelligent design) is a solid one. It’s concise, simple to understand and easy to grasp. It doesn’t hold water for me because of the sheer amount of time we can figure has passed since existence started and what that can mean for statistical anomalies. You partner that with evolution (micro or macro) and you can understand how things can work together in such a cohesive manner despite being born or chaos and random chance.


No argument from me. That directly flies in the face of all Christian doctrine on the subject but since I’m not a Christian then it’s what ever

You mentioned statistical anomalies above. This is kind of off topic but I've always wondered - if time is truly infinite and goes on long enough, that means theres a statistical probability that all of the variables that create your life will fall in place again, meaning our lives will repeat themselves, no?

I also used to think about the following, in regards to time.

If someone can run the mile in 4 minutes, let's say that's the world record. I think we would both agree that if someone can do it in 4 minutes, eventually someone can be just a split second faster, right? If time goes on long enough, does that mean we get to a point where someone can run the mile in 1 second?

Think about it. There is no point reached where someone can say that the record absolutely cannot be broken, even if it's by a micro second, and if time goes on long enough, the records will be broken. And so on.
 
where in the bible does it mention purgatory? it was just some confected bullshit to allow corrupt middle ages priests to sell indulgences and get paid to pray over candles and generally monetise their position of religious authority.
The process of deciding what is cannon and what isn’t is fascinating. The first council of nicaea in 325AD got the ball rolling and then there have been debates and disagreements since then. It’s a really interesting process
I will say they have done much better on church structure and doctrinal accountability
Tough to say the bead squeezers are big on any sort of accountability considering… ya know.
If you meet a true believer in Christianity be they Catholic or Protestant then you see it in their lives.
Absolutely. Fruits of the spirit.
What if there was only two tribes, your tribe which was large and vastly more powerful, and one other tribe that was much weaker but had a ton of resources that would be useful to your tribe. You could conquer and wipe them out completely, reap all the benefits and have zero repercussions... would you concede that it would still be morally wrong to do so?
Wiping out another tribe and jacking their shit does more harm to yours than cooperation, trade, and intermingling the gene pool would.
It's a faith. There's not much to push back on that they haven't heard a million times over. They believe what they believe, and they are no more right or wrong than anyone else on this subject, as we're all pretty much in the dark and don't know shit from shit on this subject.

My problem with the "scientific" explanation of this, is that it's treated with some sort of validity, even though it's no more or less ridiculous than any religious take on the matter. I find it funny that people will favor any group's "expertise" on the subject of the creation of the friggin' universe.
“God is all powerful and all knowing, so of course he can make donkeys talk, put a baby in that woman and give the kid magic powers” is honestly a totally acceptable answer in my book. It’s weird when people want to explain away and try to add logic to the mysticism of a religion. Say it with your chest- “magic is real because God supplies it when he so chooses”. Is an honest answer and I’d never give someone shit for saying so.
if your position is that there is no purpose or meaning, I see no reason for you to follow any set of morals that help anyone other than yourself and your inner circle
What if I purpose that we determine our own meaning?
What use is it, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but he has no works? Can that faith save him? If a brother or sister is without clothing and in need of daily food, and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, be warmed and be filled,” and yet you do not give them what is necessary for their body, what use is that? Even so faith, if it has no works, is dead, being by itself.
James must be rolling in his grave with all of the “thoughts and prayers” he sees people giving out after mass shootings

Where in the Bible is mentioned that the Bible is to be the only thing guiding Christianity?
2 Timothy 3:16-

2 Peter 1:20-21:
Revelation 22:18-19:
Deuteronomy 4:21
its even worse once you know the Bible has been translated so many times over the years.
I believe it is 98% the same now as it was in the very first texts we have copies of. The 2% that has changed is more structural than anything- did they go over the hill? Around it? Across it? Either way they got from A to B.
I’d guess it’s because Texas.

And also spending time in prayer, community and meditation is great. I don’t think there’s a god but once in a while I’ll drop into a random church for some bad coffee, friendly old ladies and lessons on morality. It’s nice.
So in other words you also think humans are different from the other animals on this planet and we have a higher purpose that goes beyond the material needs and just reproducing, consuming food, and fighting for dominance?

That was basically my point, in a universe that has no meaning or purpose, the only thing that matters is physical survival, but it would appear that we have some higher form of consciousness and dare I say a soul.
Souls are another fun topic to chew on. Anyways, that first paragraph made me curious- have you read C.S. Lewis’ “mere Christianity?” You’d really like it. You’re touching on a lot of his points.
I don’t think physical survival is only end game. If you’ve established the preference that life is better than death across your social structure you can continue establishing more preferences that limit the suffering or threats to life.
Well said.
I think you're living by Judeo Christian values whether you're aware of it or not because it's deeply ingrained in our civilization, and that's good enough, if you wanna call yourself secular, or atheist or whatever, it really doesn't change much.
There are plenty of civs that don’t have a judeo Christian background and they are still following the same rules as westerners (generally speaking).
I think it solves a lot actually.

I believe that living my life with some higher purpose makes my life better as well as that of those around me.
I would challenge you to meet with
More people serving their communities without a theistic motive and chat with them. They’re full of higher purpose.
Apparently it’s not just me, countless studies show that religious communities are more content and tend to do better than seculars by most metrics.
Sure, I’d believe that. Spending time in prayer and meditation, reading texts and cultivating compassion will
Absolutely make your life better. The best part is you don’t have to believe in a God to do these things and reap these benefits
question, if there was no consequences whatsoever, would you still consider it wrong or not?
I’m not sure I can think of a single choice that has no consequences when life and death are involved.
 
Chimps care for each other, provide resources for each other, teach each other, protect each other and choose not inflict violence on those within its social structures that it does inflict on those outside it. Are to dumb to all these preferences of intelligent social animals? This is like pre-k level knowledge how did you not learn about it?

You can’t and haven’t put forth any scenario that occurs in nature where attacking something has no consequences or risk. You admit it’s purely hypothetical. So how can it explain anything about this behavior that develops in reality? It can’t. You’re playing make believe to try save your point.

Just the awareness of another’s suffering reveals the potenial of us experiencing suffering and reveals unfairness which causes suffering in us. If I don’t have cancer but witness many people suffer it it will cause me distress and I’m now aware this or something like it could inflict me at some time
I'm sorry but are you just fucken trolling now, or are you really not understanding the English words that I'm writing on here?

THEY TAKE CARE OF THEIR OWN OFFSPRING AND IN THE CASE OF PACK ANIMALS THEY TAKE CARE OF THEIR GROUP BECAUSE OF STRENGTH IN NUMBERS, ETC... wolves, lions, etc... and other pack animals all do this, and we have already established this. Solitary animals also take care of their own offspring, but ALL THESE ANIMALS, BOTH PACK AND SOLITARY WILL GO TO WAR WITH THEIR OWN SPECIES IN COMPETITION FOR TERRITORY AND RESOURCES, CHIMPS WILL TEAR RIVAL CHIMPS APART, LIONS WILL KILL ANOTHER LION'S CUBS, AS WILL BEARS, ETC... These animals have NO SENSE of COMPASSION or FAIRNESS, they do only what improves their chance of survival, nothing more nothing less.

And yes there can absolutely be a scenario where attacking something has no consequence or risk involved, and if you think it doesn't exist right now I told you to just imagine it. It's a very simple question, IF such a scenario was there, IF it was just you and a child and there was no law against, no one to enforce it, no one to inflict retribution, and that child had a bunch of resources, and all you had to do to get them was to kill the child, with zero consequences, would you or would you not still consider it wrong?

There's no need for this word salad, it's plain and simple, we either have a greater purpose than just survival and furthering our own offspring or we don't. So in your opinion, is your existence only material or do you feel there is a greater purpose to your life?
 
Last edited:
I don't think not being a dickhead is just a Christian concept. I'm not religious but I'm not a dickhead to people because I have empathy.
And what is "empathy", is that not basically admitting that our world is not only material and there is a higher calling and purpose to being a human being, which makes us unique and different from every other living organism on this planet.
 
You mentioned statistical anomalies above. This is kind of off topic but I've always wondered - if time is truly infinite and goes on long enough, that means theres a statistical probability that all of the variables that create your life will fall in place again, meaning our lives will repeat themselves, no?

I also used to think about the following, in regards to time.

If someone can run the mile in 4 minutes, let's say that's the world record. I think we would both agree that if someone can do it in 4 minutes, eventually someone can be just a split second faster, right? If time goes on long enough, does that mean we get to a point where someone can run the mile in 1 second?

Think about it. There is no point reached where someone can say that the record absolutely cannot be broken, even if it's by a micro second, and if time goes on long enough, the records will be broken. And so on.
You sound higher than me, and im here for it. Have you seen this?
 
Are you trying to argue that humans are unlike other species? We do everything every other species does up to and including cannibalism; and we have greater capacity for everything we do thanks to our intelligence.
Yes that's exactly what I'm arguing, because yes we are unlike other species.

You listing a few similarities between us and animals does nothing to disprove that... "oh but lions have teeth, and we have teeth too therefore...."

Pretty weak argument.
 
And what is "empathy", is that not basically admitting that our world is not only material and there is a higher calling and purpose to being a human being, which makes us unique and different from every other living organism on this planet.

Not really no. The beauty of life is you can find your own purpose in it.
 
IF it was just you and a child and there was no law against, no one to enforce it, no one to inflict retribution, and that child had a bunch of resources, and all you had to do to get them was to kill the child, with zero consequences, would you or would you not still consider it wrong?
The consequences of your actions here would be a dead child.
 
Back
Top