Social Jimmy Kimmel gets Canceled

Do you think 'The Jimmy Kimmel' show should have been cancelled?


  • Total voters
    284
I think he was fairly true to himself, I've seen him question things he believed in the past. Did he play it up sometimes for the audience? I'm sure. It's no different than Rachel Maddow, Don Lemon or Alex Jones. Are we to imply that Jones, Maddow, and Lemon are evil people? Rachel Maddow, maybe. Lemon is dipshit and Alex Jones... He's kinda retarded.
I never said he was evil. He was just grinding it out, like all of us. I think the whole ecosphere of politics is extremely toxic and is what divides what otherwise would be like-minded individuals. Lemon is a fucking retard, and Alex Jones is back on some serious stimulants of some sort. I had a good friend that I partied with in the early 2000's whose heart just finally gave out on him. I am older than what he was when he woke up and collapsed in his kitchen one morning.
 
No, this is fact. After this conversation, I, a normal functioning human being, will not have an emotional fit and do harm to someone or myself as a result.
I wouldn’t expect you to do harm to anyone. Since you lack empathy, I’m describing what it can be like for minorities who have to exist alongside rhetoric from people like CK. They’re not hurting anyone either. But they certainly don’t have to grieve his death.

Once you start treating people like equals instead of victims your entire premise falls apart.
That’s the whole point of civil rights. Blacks being allowed to vote. Women being allowed to vote. No second class citizens. It’s on record, Kirk rallied against this often.

Kirk treated white men like victims all the time. He cried about things like DEI and the independence and empowerment of women. He refused to acknowledge white male privilege, an historically uneven playing field built on systemic oppression routed in racism and sexism.

That’s not to say people aren’t victimized. Kirk claimed no child in America was starving. He said homelessness was a choice. At the same time, he desperately tried to convince college kids that income tax made billionaires the victim of theft.
 
I saw a video clip of him angrily calling someone who disagreed with him a ":eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:".

On what planet is that not racist?
His name is Cenk, you moron.

images
 
I’m surprised Kimmel wasn’t canceled by the left for being part of the Man Show years ago.
 
Last edited:
I don’t know if arguing over “cheered” is worth it but there were plenty of jokes going on in there about it being his gay lover. Not just observations about how “weird” it was. Let’s say the whole ct he was having some affair wasn’t true for just a second. If so, we had some guy try to attack a high ranking politician in their house and when they failed, struck their husband with a hammer. Imagine if that was your family and people online decided to get around the political inconvenience of the situation (which in itself is stupid, just say the attacker is bad, he doesn’t represent the GOP, and move on) by making some ct about your husband having a gay affair and joking around about it. It’s much more fucked than what you’re presenting it as. And I’m not targeting you here as I don’t really remember you in the thread but I sure remember some bs jokes flying around while the guy was recovering from the attack.
They live in the same house, and it's in San Francisco ffs. Of course they have baller security. Seems odd that the guy with a drinking problem turns off the security when his wife goes out of town and somehow winds up with a male nudist in his house.

Yeah, I wouldn't want to release any more details either if there was already a media narrative far more politically favorable than what actually happened.

All the same people who instantly demand bodycam footage of every police altercation and love sticking cell phones in everyone's face to post online to dox and cancel people suddenly don't want any footage of how a male prostitute broke into a drunk millionaire's house in his underwear without triggering an alarm.

Nope, we don't want any security footage, not even a still frame of the guy prowling outside the house, don't want to know if there even is any security footage, don't want any audio of this "I want Nancy Pelosi",don't want the 911 call, don't want to know anything the guy said in questioning, I just want CNN telling me a story that makes no sense about a right wing homeless gay prostitute hemp jeweler from Berkley and absolutely nothing else.

Releasing it on porn hub?

Looked like the hammer slipped because of the lube.
Nobody cheered….
 
I wouldn’t expect you to do harm to anyone. Since you lack empathy, I’m describing what it can be like for minorities who have to exist alongside rhetoric from people like CK. They’re not hurting anyone either. But they certainly don’t have to grieve his death.


That’s the whole point of civil rights. Blacks being allowed to vote. Women being allowed to vote. No second class citizens. It’s on record, Kirk rallied against this often.

Kirk treated white men like victims all the time. He cried about things like DEI and the independence and empowerment of women. He refused to acknowledge white male privilege, an historically uneven playing field built on systemic oppression routed in racism and sexism.

That’s not to say people aren’t victimized. Kirk claimed no child in America was starving. He said homelessness was a choice. At the same time, he desperately tried to convince college kids that income tax made billionaires the victim of theft.
So me lacking empathy means I won't hurt people? Are you implying this is violence because people care so much they have to shoot others?

Civil Rights is the aftermath of a civil war where The Union wasn't solidified. In the original constitution the rights were supposed to be given to everyone, and the problem is we had a country separated and when left to states choice, it fell from the original intent. Civil Rights are a meme once you understand this. There is no point for those amendments to be enshrined when you uphold the constitution as it was meant to be upheld.

White male privilege doesn't exist. You have created a problem looking for a solution. Stop gaslighting others that they feel they're the victim when the entire fucking premise of the idea is non white males aren't good enough to compete. That's racist, bigoted, and misogynistic.

As for children aren't starving, they do, but we have plenty of operations to help combat it and parents don't use them. Homelessness is largely a choice, and people can choose to get help and routinely don't. There are outliers, but that doesn't mean on the statement isn't true.
 
So me lacking empathy means I won't hurt people? Are you implying this is violence because people care so much they have to shoot others?
You keep talking about the shooter and his state of mind and accusing me of justifying it.

Whereas I have been talking about the countless people that are affected by hate rhetoric that are not obligated to grieve or pay their respects.

Understand the distinction.

I’m not addressing the rest of your rant because it requires you further educate yourself and that’s your job not mine. And I’m all out of time.
 
Last edited:
And that's all bad enough, but the birthright citizenship shit is the biggest threat to our constitution.... ever. If these scumbags give themselves the power to essentially re-write constitutional amendments, we're not going to have any way of ever getting them out of power, or stopping them from fully transforming this country into whatever it is they think is their own image
Joe Biden tried to announce a new amendment with a tweet.

Or at least the random unelected staffer did while he was taking a nap.
 
You keep talking about the shooter and his state of mind and accusing me of justifying it.

Whereas I have been talking about the countless people that are affected by hate rhetoric that are not obligated to grieve or pay their respects.

Understand the distinction.
I don't keep talking about the shooter, I thought this was a nebulous person as an example.

I never said people were obligated to grieve or pay respects, I said have some fucking decency. There is a massive difference between cheering or celebrating someone who's by all accounts tame and fairly reasonable and understanding that you don't always agree with them that doesn't mean they deserve to die.

Understand the distinction.
 
I don't keep talking about the shooter, I thought this was a nebulous person as an example.

I never said people were obligated to grieve or pay respects, I said have some fucking decency. There is a massive difference between cheering or celebrating someone who's by all accounts tame and fairly reasonable and understanding that you don't always agree with them that doesn't mean they deserve to die.

Understand the distinction.
Ya but, ya but.
You keep saying the same thing. Nobody said they deserve to die. 🤷🏻‍♂️ Do you really not understand the difference? Not shedding tears does not make someone homicidal.
 
Good thing you didn't even watch the video. Talk about an oopsie.

The first clip isn't even referenced in the rest of it, and he's saying treason should result in execution. This used to be the standard, and while I don't agree with it, that's not a crazy take.

I noticed you had to add "but" when you've made it abundantly clear you dislike the guy. It's easy to group like minded sentiments together.

The clip from the mirror is also not the full context, and thinking Joe Biden should be put in prison is no different than lefties thinking Trump should be put in prison. So when you look at it objectively, you realize its the same shit and it becomes clear that this sentiment is normalized.
"Biden is a bumbling, dementia filled, alzheimers corrupt tyrant who should, honestly, be put in prison and / or given the death penalty for his crimes against America"

"Thats not saying the sitting president should be executed, its just a reminder that the penalty for treason is death, also what about Trump" - absolutely delusional justification. Also unlike Trump, Biden isnt a convicted felon and he also didnt rile up a crowd to storm the Capitol.

ill speak for myself thanks. If you want to lump people with valid criticism for Charlie Kirk that have also repeatedly condemned his murder AND called out those scumbags cheering for his death, you can f*ck right off with the whining about getting called nazis or being lumped in with the most vile and racist elements on the right (something I have not done) because if you dont want to even find some point of common ground in all of this with people that are not even far-left (ie: we can agree his death was a tragedy, we can agree that he didnt deserve to die for his beliefs, we can agree that people cheering it are evil scumbags, we can agree that some of his commentary is overblown/out of context, just to name a few) then what do you expect to even come out of this other than outrage and finger pointing at "sides"? Its so pointless
 
Nobody cheered….

Thanks, I was too lazy to go read through it again. Definitely knew there was shit like that at the time. There’s posts too of me pointing out how people should consider how fucked up their jokes are if they are wrong but it just went on. Some may not agree but I think you aren’t completely absolved cracking jokes like that even if you have suspicion of a different narrative and then find out you were wrong. Like did they care if they were right or wrong about what really happened? Or was it about come up with x narrative to make Pelosi look bad and us joke about violence committed against her family. It was a low point for the forum but we’ve stayed there for years now.
 
And that's all bad enough, but the birthright citizenship shit is the biggest threat to our constitution.... ever. If these scumbags give themselves the power to essentially re-write constitutional amendments, we're not going to have any way of ever getting them out of power, or stopping them from fully transforming this country into whatever it is they think is their own image
And that’s what we’re going to find out. Ole’ Mitchie boy figured it out over a decade ago. Nobody has to rewrite shit if the people who are the final authority will say it means whatever they want it to mean. In the end, as always, it will come down to a few individuals whether or not the constitution really matters.
 
I don’t know if arguing over “cheered” is worth it but there were plenty of jokes going on in there about it being his gay lover. Not just observations about how “weird” it was. Let’s say the whole ct he was having some affair wasn’t true for just a second. If so, we had some guy try to attack a high ranking politician in their house and when they failed, struck their husband with a hammer. Imagine if that was your family and people online decided to get around the political inconvenience of the situation (which in itself is stupid, just say the attacker is bad, he doesn’t represent the GOP, and move on) by making some ct about your husband having a gay affair and joking around about it. It’s much more fucked than what you’re presenting it as. And I’m not targeting you here as I don’t really remember you in the thread but I sure remember some bs jokes flying around while the guy was recovering from the attack.

Was any of this was over FCC regulated media and airwaves?
 
Back
Top