My cousin is a doctor I think I know what the fuck I'm talking about dawg.
Over here Doctors study medicine and surgery; Nutritionists study nutrition.
My cousin is a doctor I think I know what the fuck I'm talking about dawg.
Do you even lift?
Over here Doctors study medicine and surgery; Nutritionists study nutrition.
True but gaining muscle lowers you bf automatically.
So you are in a sense losing fat and gaining muscle technically.
Since muscle is denser than fat, if he weighs the same but has more muscle and less fat, wouldn't that make him smaller volume wise?
![]()
You need to quantify your statement otherwise it is just more SD bullshit.
4 years ago at UFC 95 (239lbs):
![]()
Yesterday (also 239lbs):
![]()
Little difference imo. Certainly nothing more than you'd expect from four years of training.
Just slightly more defined, is all I can see.
The second image was actually from the Carwin fight. I accidentally pasted the wrong link.
I've added the one from yesterday but still little difference, especially when taking into account the darker skin tone. Not seeing him having "packed on muscle" that a bunch of people are talking about.
He said it accurately.
Muscle and fat, being the same volume, muscle will be heavier.
Muscle and Fat, being the same weight, muscle will have less volume than fat.
Just slightly more defined, is all I can see.
My cousin is a doctor I think I know what the fuck I'm talking about dawg.
You can lose body fat by turning it into more muscle mass therefore he's not wrong.
fat doesn't turn into muscle
Fat doesn't turn into muscle, that's a myth. He probably lost some body fat (which would have made his weight go down) and added muscle (making his weight go up) and just ended up at the same weight.
Drop another cliche
they are equal
You don't what a cliche is.